<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="English" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-f-political-science</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/158065.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34257/GJHSS158065</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">158065</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Iranian Tinderbox vs Rational Diplomacy</article-title>
<subtitle>US Fiscal Instability and the Iran Conflict Risk</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Esposto</surname><given-names>Alexis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">Australia, Danford Higher Education</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-28">
<day>28</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>13</fpage>
<lpage>16</lpage>
<abstract><p>Examining U.S. fiscal instability and confrontation with Iran, this article argues that military escalation in 2026 risks systemic collapse. It analyses three domains: America’s structural debt fragility, now at $38.5 trillion; market signals-record gold prices and dollar weakness-indicating eroding confidence in fiat regimes; and Iran’s geostrategic position as an energy chokepoint and ‘mountain fortress’ resistant to invasion. Drawing on historical precedents, it concludes that regime-change strategies could end up in catastrophic miscalculations. Only a return to multilateral diplomacy can avert an economic and security disaster with severe global consequences.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>Geopolitics</kwd>
<kwd>multipolarity</kwd>
<kwd>fiscal instability</kwd>
<kwd>international markets.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://doc.globaljournals.org:/a3ndzj_158065/article/the-iranian-tinderbox-vs-rational-diplomacy.pdf?v=8f1db7c49464#" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/the-iranian-tinderbox-vs-rational-diplomacy/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Examining U.S. fiscal instability and confrontation with Iran, this article argues that military escalation in 2026 risks systemic collapse. It analyses three domains: America’s structural debt fragility, now at $38.5 trillion; market signals-record gold prices and dollar weakness-indicating eroding confidence in fiat regimes; and Iran’s geostrategic position as an energy chokepoint and ‘mountain fortress’ resistant to invasion. Drawing on historical precedents, it concludes that regime-change strategies could end up in catastrophic miscalculations. Only a return to multilateral diplomacy can avert an economic and security disaster with severe global consequences.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>