<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-c-sociology-culture</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - C: Sociology &amp; Culture</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/159569.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34257/GJHSSC159569</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">159569</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Silenced by Omission: Race, Class, and the Politics of Visibility in I, Daniel Blake and Healing a Divided Britain</article-title>
<subtitle>Race, Class, and Visibility in I, Daniel Blake</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ming</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">China</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>39</fpage>
<lpage>42</lpage>
<abstract><p>This paper examines how race and class are represented and obscured in Ken Loach’s I, Daniel Blake and the government report Healing a Divided Britain. While the film highlights working-class struggles under austerity, it largely omits racial minorities, reinforcing whiteness as the default experience of suffering. In contrast, the report reveals deep-rooted racial inequalities across British society. Through comparing these narratives, the paper argues that such omissions in cultural storytelling silence marginalized voices and uphold existing power structures. The study calls for more inclusive narratives that reflect the full diversity of social hardship in Britain.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>Racial Invisibility</kwd>
<kwd>I</kwd>
<kwd>Daniel Blake</kwd>
<kwd>Healing a Divided Britain</kwd>
<kwd>Racial Inequalities</kwd>
<kwd>Intersectionality.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://doc.globaljournals.org:/e2jo39_159569/article/silenced-by-omission-race-class-and-the-politics-of-visibility-in-i-daniel-blake-and-healing-a-divided-britain.pdf?v=201a452a4bff#" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/silenced-by-omission-race-class-and-the-politics-of-visibility-in-i-daniel-blake-and-healing-a-divided-britain/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>This paper examines how race and class are represented and obscured in Ken Loach’s I,Daniel Blake and the government report Healing a Divided Britain. While the film highlights working-class struggles under austerity, it largely omits racial minorities, reinforcing whiteness as the default experience of suffering. In contrast, the report reveals deep-rooted racial inequalities across British society. Through comparing these narratives, the paper argues that such omissions in cultural storytelling silence marginalized voices and uphold existing power structures. The study calls for more inclusive narratives that reflect the full diversity of social hardship in Britain.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>