<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en-US" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-e-economics</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - E: Economics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/159789.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34257/GJHSS159789</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">159789</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Manuscript by Rupesh Chandrasen Londhe</article-title>
<subtitle>NIRF vs Global University Rankings Analysis</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Londhe</surname><given-names>Rupesh</given-names></name><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-0955-1143</contrib-id><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">India, Institute of Hotel Management and Catering Technology</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-30">
<day>30</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>31</fpage>
<lpage>37</lpage>
<abstract><p>The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) represents India’s official higher education ranking system designed to balance national development priorities with global academic competitiveness. This study presents a comparative academic analysis of NIRF and major global university ranking systems, including QS, Times Higher Education (THE), and the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). Using conceptual regression modeling and structural equation modeling frameworks, the study examines how NIRF indicators—particularly research productivity, inclusivity, and sustainability alignment—predict global ranking outcomes. The findings indicate that NIRF functions both as a domestic accountability mechanism and as a strategic pathway toward global recognition.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>NIRF</kwd>
<kwd>Global Rankings</kwd>
<kwd>Higher Education Policy</kwd>
<kwd>Internationalization</kwd>
<kwd>Bibliometrics</kwd>
<kwd>Sustainability</kwd>
<kwd>SDGs.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://doc.globaljournals.org:/yovwn7_159789/article/nirf-and-global-rankings-a-comparative-academic-analysis.pdf?v=7d90f82b1432#" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/nirf-and-global-rankings-a-comparative-academic-analysis/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) represents India’s official higher education ranking system designed to balance national development priorities with global academic competitiveness.
This study presents a comparative academic analysis of NIRF and major global university ranking systems, including QS, Times Higher Education (THE), and the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU).
Using conceptual regression modeling and structural equation modeling frameworks, the study examines how NIRF indicators-particularly research productivity, inclusivity, and sustainability alignment-predict global ranking outcomes.
The findings indicate that NIRF functions both as a domestic accountability mechanism and as a strategic pathway toward global recognition.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>