<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-h-interdisciplinary</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/257430.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34257/GJHSSH257430</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">257430</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Thomas More’s Utopia: An Ingenious Architectural Design for Social Order and a Virtual Legislative Laboratory for Political Experimentation</article-title>
<subtitle>More’s Utopia: Architectural Design and Politics</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Robles</surname><given-names>María</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">SPAIN, Bioiliberis Research and Development (Spain)</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-05-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>10</fpage>
<lpage>26</lpage>
<abstract><p>Utopia is analysed as a rhetorical work characteristic of humanism that demands an active and interpretative reading. Its meaning is constructed through paradoxes that challenge conventional wisdom, in line with Erasmus of Rotterdam’s proposal in a letter addressed to Ulrich von Hutten, and depends on both the historical context and the author’s biographical details for a proper understanding. Finally, a brief section will be included linking utopia, science fiction and artificial intelligence as tools for reflecting on social organisation. From this perspective, Utopia can be understood as a theoretical framework that remains relevant today, whilst science fiction and artificial intelligence appear as contemporary manifestations of that same utopian impulse.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>Utopia</kwd>
<kwd>paradox</kwd>
<kwd>Erasmus’s letter</kwd>
<kwd>legislative laboratory</kwd>
<kwd>virtuality.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org:/GJHSS_Volume26/mores-utopia-architectural-design-and-politics.pdf?v=d6e821a1d0a6#" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/thomas-mores-utopia-an-ingenious-architectural-design-for-social-order-and-a-virtual-legislative-laboratory-for-political-experimentation/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p></p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>