<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-science-frontier-research-h-environment-environmental-geology</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - H: Environment &amp; Environmental geology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-5896</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-4626</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/52723.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">52723</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Greenhouse Gases: Background Issues</article-title>
<subtitle>Climate Change Drivers and Barriers to Action</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pinedo-Vega</surname><given-names>JosÃ© Luis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Banda-DÃ¡vila</surname><given-names>Astrid Monserrat</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>DÃ¡vila-Rangel</surname><given-names>J. Ignacio</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mireles-GarcÃ­a</surname><given-names>Fernando</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>RÃ­os-MartÃ­nez</surname><given-names>Carlos</given-names></name></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">MEXICO, Universidad AutÃ³noma de Zacatecas,</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-11-07">
<day>07</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>H6</issue>
<fpage>41</fpage>
<lpage>47</lpage>
<abstract><p>This paper re-discusses the relationship of greenhouse gases (GHG) with fossil energy consumption together with clean and renewable energies. It is shown that GHG has an increasing trend despite the spectacular growth of renewable energies, the promotion of energy savings, and the incorporation of more efficient energy systems; which is indicative that fossil energies grow at a speed superior to clean energies. This explains that natural mechanisms of GHG destruction are not infallible. In particular, it is emphasized that photosynthesis is restricted to 𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑂 2 , it can only act at the level of the leaves of plants, therefore it cannot be expected to process the 𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑂 2 from the rest of the atmosphere, and it is impossible for it to act on other GHGs. That means that reforestation, although very valuable, cannot be expected to be an infallible solution. In addition, it is noted that, despite the alleged commitment of almost 200 states present in the COP26 the initiatives remain declarative, are restricted to 𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑂 2 , and are still far from being operational, as is the case with the proposals to sequester 𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑂 2 . And indeed, there are no concrete initiatives to combat the rest of the GHGs.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>greenhouse gases</kwd>
<kwd>fossil energy consumption</kwd>
<kwd>clean energy</kwd>
<kwd>renewable energy.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume22/3-Greenhouse-Gases-Background.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/greenhouse-gases-background-issues/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>This paper re-discusses the relationship of greenhouse gases (GHG) with fossil energy consumption together with clean and renewable energies. It is shown that GHG has an increasing trend despite the spectacular growth of renewable energies, the promotion of energy savings, and the incorporation of more efficient energy systems; which is indicative that fossil energies grow at a speed superior to clean energies. This explains that natural mechanisms of GHG destruction are not infallible. In particular, it is emphasized that photosynthesis is restricted to ð‘ªð‘ªð‘¶ð‘¶ðŸðŸ, it can only act at the level of the leaves of plants, therefore it cannot be expected to process theð‘ªð‘ªð‘¶ð‘¶ðŸðŸ from the rest of the atmosphere, and it is impossible for it to act on other GHGs. That means that reforestation, although very valuable, cannot be expected to be an infallible solution. In addition, it is noted that, despite the alleged commitment of almost 200 states present in the COP26 the initiatives remain declarative, are restricted to ð‘ªð‘ªð‘¶ð‘¶ðŸðŸ, and are still far from being operational, as is the case with the proposals to sequester ð‘ªð‘ªð‘¶ð‘¶ðŸðŸ. And indeed, there are no concrete initiatives to combat the rest of the GHGs.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>