<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-computer-science-and-technology-c-software-data-engineering</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software &amp; Data Engineering</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-4350</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">0975-4172</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/55244.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">55244</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Evolution of Object-Oriented Database Systems</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alzahrani</surname><given-names>Hibatullah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">UNITED STATES, Clark Atlanta University</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2016-01-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>C3</issue>
<fpage>37</fpage>
<lpage>40</lpage>
<abstract><p>Data bases are quintessential part of most modern web and mobile applications. In most part, relational databases dominate the database market but the evolution of object-oriented databases has provided users and developers with an alternative option. Object-oriented databases provide a number of advantages over relational databases like ease of extensibility, custom data models, provision for modelling complex data structures and faster access time. But they do lack in certain areas and have no strict standards and implementation mostly depends upon the vendor. Nevertheless, object-oriented databases are slowly finding their way into database market, especially in the area of large-scale databases. But the long history of relational databases keeps them alive as tough competitor and the future seems to be going towards object-relational databases.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>object-oriented</kwd>
<kwd>database</kwd>
<kwd>relational</kwd>
<kwd>data- base management system</kwd>
<kwd>evolution</kwd>
<kwd>advantages</kwd>
<kwd>disadvantages.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJCST_Volume16/5-Evolution-of-Object-Oriented-Database.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/evolution-of-object-oriented-database-systems/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Data bases  are quintessential part of most modern web and mobile applications. In most part, relational databases dominate the database market but the evolution of object-oriented databases has provided users and developers with an alternative option. Object-oriented databases provide a number of advantages over relational databases like ease of extensibility, custom data models, provision for modelling complex data structures and faster access time. But they do lack in certain areas and have no strict standards and implementation mostly depends upon the vendor. Nevertheless, object-oriented databases are slowly finding their way into database market, especially in the area of large-scale databases. But the long history of relational databases keeps them alive as tough competitor and the future seems to be going towards object-relational databases.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>