<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-management-and-business-research-c-finance</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-5853</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-4588</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/56319.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">56319</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Regulating Frauds in Online Marketplace Lending: A Comparative Study on China and U.S.</article-title>
<subtitle>Online Marketplace Lending and Platform Risks</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>Zhen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Jing Tao Andy</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>Ho Kai</given-names></name></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dan</surname><given-names>Ting Rose</given-names></name></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">CHINA, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-08-26">
<day>26</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>C3</issue>
<fpage>21</fpage>
<lpage>32</lpage>
<abstract><p>Recent platform frauds in the U.S. and other parts of the world raise skepticism about the viability of online marketplace lending (OML), a fast-growing new industry. In China, over onethird of peer-to-peer lending platforms have failed, many involve outright fraud. We find in the U.S., OML platforms profit from loan origination but do not bear borrower credit risk, giving rise to the incentive to overstate borrowers’ quality. In China, most OML platforms are “balance sheet lenders” but not subject to the banking regulations. Failure to control borrower credit risk and moral hazard lead to Ponzi Scheme-type platform-runs. Our comparative case study on Lending Club (NYSE: LC) versus Yirendai (NYSE: YRD), and empirical analysis of 735 OML plat-forms in China confirm these observations. We discuss regulatory responses and market-based solutions including leveraging users’ social networks in lending.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>online marketplace lending; fraud; platform failure; china</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume22/3-Regulating-Frauds-in-Online-Marketplace.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/regulating-frauds-in-online-marketplace-lending-a-comparative-study-on-china-and-u-s/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Recent platform frauds in the U.S. and other parts of the world raise skepticism about the viability of online marketplace lending (OML), a fast-growing new industry. In China, over one-third of peer-to-peer lending platforms have failed, many involve outright fraud. We find in the U.S., OML platforms profit from loan origination but do not bear borrower credit risk, giving rise to the incentive to overstate borrowersâ€™ quality. In China, most OML platforms are â€œbalance sheet lendersâ€ but not subject to the banking regulations. Failure to control borrower credit risk and moral hazard lead to Ponzi Scheme-type platform-runs. Our comparative case study on Lending Club (NYSE: LC) versus Yirendai (NYSE: YRD), and empirical analysis of 735 OML platforms in China confirm these observations. We discuss regulatory responses and market-based solutions including leveraging usersâ€™ social networks in lending.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>