<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-management-and-business-research-a-administration-management</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration &amp; Management</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-5853</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-4588</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/56544.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">56544</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Administration: Science, Art or Technique? A Reflective Look at the Epistemological Status of the Administration</article-title>
<subtitle>The Epistemic Status of Administration as Science</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>MarÃ­a G. Torres</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Marcelo A. Rangel</given-names></name></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">UNITED STATES</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-02-14">
<day>14</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>23</volume>
<issue>A1</issue>
<fpage>49</fpage>
<lpage>55</lpage>
<abstract><p>The study of the administrative work of man has raised the statement of different epistemic perspectives exclusive of each other. This perspective coincides with delineating the organization as a central element of the discipline and, administrative processes as an exclusive object of study; disagreeing on the way of understanding the nature of the organization as of the administrative action, and, therefore, in the methods used for its investigative approach. This article is the result of a reflective experience given from a critical perspective with nuances of complexity that, are based on a documentary review of the main theoretical approaches of administration. It traces the notion of administration and its epistemological status, considering a series of features of administration, which are considered epistemic obstacles. Finally, the article pretends to represent administration as a theoretical-practical systemic epistemological framework that admits the complexity of the administrative phenomenon as science, art, and technique.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>administration</kwd>
<kwd>epistemology</kwd>
<kwd>science</kwd>
<kwd>art</kwd>
<kwd>technique.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume23/4-Administration-Science-Art-or-Technique.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/administration-science-art-or-technique-a-reflective-look-at-the-epistemological-status-of-the-administration/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>The study of the administrative work of man has raised the statement of different epistemic perspectives exclusive of each other. This perspective coincides with delineating the organization as a central element of the discipline and, administrative processes as an exclusive object of study; disagreeing on the way of understanding the nature of the organization as of the administrative action, and, therefore, in the methods used for its investigative approach.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>