<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-management-and-business-research-b-economic-commerce</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic &amp; Commerce</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-5853</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-4588</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/56583.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">56583</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Meta-Analysis of Perceptions of Occupational Risks in the COVID-19 Era</article-title>
<subtitle>Risk Perception and Biosafety Policies in COVID-19</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sanchez</surname><given-names>Arturo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lilies</surname><given-names>Cruz Garcia</given-names></name></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">MEXICO</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-04-27">
<day>27</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>23</volume>
<issue>B2</issue>
<fpage>31</fpage>
<lpage>38</lpage>
<abstract><p>The target of the work was to review the literature on the perception of occupational risks during the pandemic. A documentary, cross-sectional and systematic investigation was carried out with a selection of sources indexed to international repositories, considering the period from 2019 to 2022. A network of profusion and connectivity was found that explains the differences and perceptual similarities around occupational risks. Relation _ to biosafety policies, the adjustment of the model is recommended to be able to anticipate decisions and behaviors determined by expectations against or in favor of occupational accidents and illnesses.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>COVID-19</kwd>
<kwd>risk perception</kwd>
<kwd>factor analysis</kwd>
<kwd>structural model.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume23/4-Meta-Analysis-of-Perceptions.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/meta-analysis-of-perceptions-of-occupational-risks-in-the-covid-19-era/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>The target of the work was to review the literature on the perception of occupational risks during the pandemic. A documentary, cross-sectional and systematic investigation was carried out with a selection of sources indexed to international repositories, considering the period from 2019 to 2022. A network of profusion and connectivity was found that explains the differences and perceptual similarities around occupational risks. relation _ to biosafety policies, the adjustment of the model is recommended to be able to anticipate decisions and behaviors determined by expectations against or in favor of occupational accidents and illnesses.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>