<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-g-linguistics-education</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics &amp; Education</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/63037.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">63037</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Does the MS Spell Checker Effectively Correct Non-Native English Writersâ€™ Errors? A Case Study of Saudi University Students</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alasmari</surname><given-names>Nasser</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alamri</surname><given-names>Nourah</given-names></name></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">SAUDI ARABIA, University of Jeddah</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-01-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<issue>G10</issue>
<fpage>33</fpage>
<lpage>52</lpage>
<abstract><p>Those learning English as a second or foreign language use spell checkers to correct the mistakes and errors they may have made while typing texts on a computer. However, scholars have debated the effectiveness of such checkers, which were originally designed to fix the spelling mistakes of native speakers. An example of these checkers is the Microsoft (MS) Word program, which constitutes the focus of the current study. This study examined how MS Word treats misspellings made by Saudi learners of English as a foreign language. It specifically addressed three research questions: (1) which L2 spelling errors were successfully fixed by MS Word; (2) which L2 spelling errors were unsuccessfully fixed by MS Word; and (3) how did intermediate L2 learners respond to alternative corrections provided by MS Word. A screentracking software, Screencast-O-Matic, was used to monitor the MS Word spell checker’s treatment of misspelled words. It was also used to track learners’ reactions to alternative corrections provided by MS Word in real time. The study analysed 401 errors made by25 female intermediate-level English learners at a Saudi university.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>MS word spell checker</kwd>
<kwd>errors</kwd>
<kwd>mistakes</kwd>
<kwd>treatment</kwd>
<kwd>corrections.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume19/3-Does-the-MS-Spell-Checker.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/does-the-ms-spell-checker-effectively-correct-non-native-english-writers-errors-a-case-study-of-saudi-university-students/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Those learning English as a second or foreign language use spell checkers to correct the mistakes and errors they may have made while typing texts on a computer. However, scholars have debated the effectiveness of such checkers, which were originally designed to fix the spelling mistakes of native speakers. An example of these checkers is the Microsoft (MS) Word program, which constitutes the focus of the current study. This study examined how MS Word treats misspellings made by Saudi learners of English as a foreign language. It specifically addressed three research questions: (1) which L2 spelling errors were successfully fixed by MS Word; (2) which L2 spelling errors were unsuccessfully fixed by MS Word; and (3) how did intermediate L2 learners respond to alternative corrections provided by MS Word. A screentracking software, Screencast-O-Matic, was used to monitor the MS Word spell checkerâ€™s treatment of misspelled words. It was also used to track learnersâ€™ reactions to alternative corrections provided by MS Word in real time. The study analysed 401 errors made by25 female intermediate-level English learners at a Saudi university.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>