<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-computer-science-and-technology</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-4350</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">0975-4172</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/72767.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">72767</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A negative auction</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cioni</surname><given-names>Dr. Lorenzo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">ITALY, University of Pisa largo</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2010-03-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2010</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>15</issue>
<abstract><p>In this paper we are going to use the term mechanism in a rather informal sense as a set of rules, strategies and procedures. For a more formal use of the</p></abstract>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJCST_Volume10/a-negative-auction.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/a-negative-auction/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>In this paper we describe a type of auction mechanism where the auctioneer A wants to auction an item  among a certain number of bidders bi ∈ B (i = 1, . . . , n) that submit bids in the auction with the aim of not getting . Owing to this feature we call this mechanism a negative auction. The main motivation of this mechanism is that both the bidders and the auctioneer give a negative value to the auctioned item (and so they see it as a bad rather than a good). The mechanism is presented in its basic simple version and with some possible extensions that account for the payment of a fee for not at- tending the auction, the interactions among the bidders and the pres- ence of other supporting actors.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>