<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-science-frontier-research-a-physics-space-science</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics &amp; Space Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-5896</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-4626</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/75307.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">75307</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einsteinas Equivalence Principle</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lo</surname><given-names>Dr. C. Y.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">UNITED STATES, Applied and Pure Research Institute</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-12-11">
<day>11</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<issue>A8</issue>
<fpage>9</fpage>
<lpage>18</lpage>
<abstract><p>The local Lorentz symmetry says that the laws of physics are the same for all local inertial observers moving through space, regardless of their velocity and orientation. However, this notion of symmetry actually comes from the distortion of Einstein’s equivalence principle by the Wheeler School because they do not understand the essence of its physics and its mathematical foundation adequately. To clarify this, Einstein’s equivalence principle, quoted from Eins-tein, is compared with related theorems. A crucial point is that the Einstein-Minkowski condition is satisfied naturally as part of the physical process. It is pointed out also that Einstein’s equivalence principle is supported by experiments. It is shown: 1) based on general relativity, a violation of the local Lorentz invariance is generally expected; 2) the interpreta-tion of Misner, Thorne, &amp; Wheeler, in fact, disagrees with Einstein’s equivalence principle; 3) mathematical analysis shows that their interpretation is a misleading distortion since it is valid only for the case of special relativity.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>lorentz symmetry; einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle; pauliâ€™s version; wheelerâ€™s distortion; mathematical analysis; finite open covering theorem.0</kwd>
<kwd>lorentz symmetry; einstein’s equivalence principle; pauli’s version; wheeler’s distortion; mathematical analysis; finite open covering theorem.0</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume12/3-Local-Lorentz-Invariance-and-the-Dist.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/local-lorentz-invariance-and-the-distortion-of-einsteinas-equivalence-principle/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>The local Lorentz symmetry says that the laws of physics are the same for all local inertial observers moving through space, regardless of their velocity and orientation. However, this notion of symmetry actually comes from the distortion of Einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle by the Wheeler School because they do not understand the essence of its physics and its mathematical foundation adequately. To clarify this, Einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle, quoted from Eins-tein, is compared with related theorems. A crucial point is that the Einstein-Minkowski condition is satisfied naturally as part of the physical process. It is pointed out also that Einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle is supported by experiments. It is shown: 1) based on general relativity, a violation of the local Lorentz invariance is generally expected; 2) the interpreta-tion of Misner, Thorne, &amp; Wheeler, in fact, disagrees with Einsteinâ€™s equivalence principle; 3) mathematical analysis shows that their interpretation is a misleading distortion since it is valid only for the case of special relativity.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>