<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-h-interdisciplinary</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/76100.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">76100</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Manifestation of Contemporary Leadership Issues and its Relevance to Diverse Leadership Methods and Contingency Models: A Review of Literature</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Akintunde</surname><given-names>Olufemi Atanda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">NIGERIA, University of Phoenix</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-01-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>H2</issue>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
<abstract><p>explains that, “leadership remains an ambiguous, amorphous, and frequently misunderstood topic” (p. ix). Therefore, isolating and discussing a limited number of leadership models may suggest one is more significant than the other. This paper purposefully lacks the attachment of special significance, and instead, offers a limited focus on certain contingency theories. The present paper reviews the literature of studies conducted by using diverse leadership methods, the similarities and differences in these leadership models.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>diverse</kwd>
<kwd>leadership methods</kwd>
<kwd>transactional</kwd>
<kwd>transformational</kwd>
<kwd>situational</kwd>
<kwd>charismatic.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume13/1-Manifestation-of-Contemporary-Leadership.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/manifestation-of-contemporary-leadership-issues-and-its-relevance-to-diverse-leadership-methods-and-contingency-models-a-review-of-literature/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Wren (1995) explains that, â€œleadership remains an ambiguous, amorphous, and frequently misunderstood topic&quot; (p. ix). Therefore, isolating and discussing a limited number of leadership models may suggest one is more significant than the other. This paper purposefully lacks the attachment of special significance, and instead, offers a limited focus on certain contingency theories. The present paper reviews the literature of studies conducted by using diverse leadership methods, the similarities and differences in these leadership models.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>