<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-management-and-business-research-b-economic-commerce</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic &amp; Commerce</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-5853</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-4588</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/77376.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">77376</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Colonial Traces of Fractionalization: The Possibilities of Africa Moving Beyond the Walls to a Sustained Growth</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dogbey</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">UNITED STATES, University of Nebraska at Omaha</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2014-01-15">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>B5</issue>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>10</lpage>
<abstract><p>While fractionalization had long been debated as one of the devastating economic factors on the African continent, there is much to believe that some important factors are responsible not only for its increasing growth and adverse effects, but also its perpetuation over the continent. This paper asserts that, colonial rule, among others, is to blame for the difficulties involved in dealing with the seemingly invincible effects of linguistic fractionalization and makes a recommendation that could help assuage the situation. The results are robust to alternative specifications including OLS, a simultaneous equation model and a spatial econometric model.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>fractionalization</kwd>
<kwd>institutions</kwd>
<kwd>trade</kwd>
<kwd>colonial rule</kwd>
<kwd>homogeneity</kwd>
<kwd>spatial dependence.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume14/1-Colonial-Traces-of-Fractionalization.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/colonial-traces-of-fractionalization-the-possibilities-of-africa-moving-beyond-the-walls-to-a-sustained-growth/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>While fractionalization had long been debated as one of the devastating economic factors on the African continent, there is much to believe that some important factors are responsible not only for its increasing growth and adverse effects, but also its perpetuation over the continent. This paper asserts that, colonial rule, among others, is to blame for the difficulties involved in dealing with the seemingly invincible effects of linguistic fractionalization and makes a recommendation that could help assuage the situation. The results are robust to alternative specifications including OLS, a simultaneous equation model and a spatial econometric model.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>