<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-f-political-science</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/83032.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">83032</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Nuclear-Powered Submarines and the Global Nuclear Order</article-title>
<subtitle>Nuclear Propulsion and Global Non-Proliferation</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>Marcos Valle Machado da</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">BRAZIL</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-03-18">
<day>18</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>F2</issue>
<fpage>41</fpage>
<lpage>58</lpage>
<abstract><p>The nuclear propulsion of submarines has never been raised as a source of controversy since the countries operating nuclear-powered submarines are only the five Nuclear-Weapon States recognized in the NPT, plus India, which is not a signatory to the NPT. However, with the advancement of the Brazilian nuclear-powered submarine program and the announcement that Australia will operate and develop nuclear-powered submarines, this issue has become a hot spot on the non-proliferation agenda. In this context, two questions arise: What are the perceptions of the main actors involved with the issue of nuclear energy use for the propulsion of submarines of Non-nuclear Weapon States? What are the impacts of these perceptions on the global nuclear order? This article argues that a new normative inequality would be in the formation process, in which there would be the “have” and “have-not” users of nuclear energy for the propulsion of submarines.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>global nuclear order. non-proliferation. nuclear-powered submarines.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume24/4-Nuclear-Powered-Submarines.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/nuclear-powered-submarines-and-the-global-nuclear-order/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>The nuclear propulsion of submarines has never been raised as a source of controversy since the countries operating nuclear-powered submarines are only the five Nuclear-Weapon States recognized in the NPT, plus India, which is not a signatory to the NPT. However, with the advancement of the Brazilian nuclear-powered submarine program and the announcement that Australia will operate and develop nuclear-powered submarines, this issue has become a hot spot on the non-proliferation agenda. In this context, two questions arise: What are the perceptions of the main actors involved with the issue of nuclear energy use for the propulsion of submarines of Non-nuclear Weapon States? What are the impacts of these perceptions on the global nuclear order? This article argues that a new normative inequality would be in the formation process, in which there would be the â€œhaveâ€ and â€œhave-notâ€ users of nuclear energy for the propulsion of submarines.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>