<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-g-linguistics-education</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics &amp; Education</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/83658.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">83658</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Gehenna Reexamined: Annihilation and Final Punishment in Intertestamental Jewish Thought</article-title>
<subtitle>Gehenna and Annihilation in Intertestamental Thought</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>Matthew</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">UNITED STATES</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-11-04">
<day>04</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>G8</issue>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>13</lpage>
<abstract><p>Introduction-Intertestamental Jewish writings often vaguely yet sometimes specifically address the nature and duration of final punishment of the ‘wicked.’ What constituted the ‘wicked’ in the extrabiblical Jewish literature-similarly to the Hebrew Bible-was consistently defined as those who broke God’s moral law intentionally and persistently. For these wrath-appointed persons, their final judgement lay in the commonly recognized and dreaded place (or state) of punishment called Gehenna. This paper will argue that upon examination of intertestamental Jewish writings there is considerable support for the view of Gehenna judgment as a terminable period of suffering leading to complete destruction (annihilation) of the wicked. The approach of this paper will be to analyze intertestamental Jewish writings and the teachings of Jesus in relation to the Gehenna. While the views on death and judgement in the afterlife were as varied in the intertestamental period as they are today, the intertestamental authors’ use language which depicts the final judgment as something which may at times be interpreted as analogous with the traditional-more accurately “Hellenistic”-Christian view of hell, or at times prevents resurrection of the wicked entirely (Maccabees), or majoritively as a punishment which ends in a fiery conflagration spawning an eternal consequence of destruction in its most non-figurative and complete sense.</p></abstract>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume24/1-Gehenna-Reexamined.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/gehenna-reexamined-annihilation-and-final-punishment-in-intertestamental-jewish-thought/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>Intertestamental Jewish writings often vaguely yet sometimes specifically address the nature and duration of final punishment of the â€˜wicked.â€™ What constituted the â€˜wickedâ€™ in the extrabiblical Jewish literatureâ€”similarly to the Hebrew Bibleâ€”was consistently defined as those who broke Godâ€™s moral law intentionally and persistently. For these wrath-appointed persons, their final judgement lay in the commonly recognized and dreaded place (or state) of punishment called Gehenna. This paper will argue that upon examination of intertestamental Jewish writings there is considerable support for the view of Gehenna judgment as a terminable period of suffering leading to complete destruction (annihilation) of the wicked. The approach of this paper will be to analyze intertestamental Jewish writings and the teachings of Jesus in relation to the Gehenna. While the views on death and judgement in the afterlife were as varied in the intertestamental period as they are today, the intertestamental authorsâ€™ use language which depicts the final judgment as something which may at times be interpreted as analogous with the traditionalâ€”more accurately â€œHellenisticâ€â€”Christian view of hell, or at times prevents resurrection of the wicked entirely (Maccabees), or majoritively as a punishment which ends in a fiery conflagration spawning an eternal consequence of destruction in its most non-figurative and complete sense.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>