<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">global-journal-of-human-social-science-g-linguistics-education</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics &amp; Education</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="print">0975-587X</issn>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2249-460X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Global Journals Publishing Group Incorporated</publisher-name></publisher>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/journal-seo-export/jats/83730.xml" />
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">83730</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Book Review for Assessments for Inclusion in Higher Education - Promoting Equity and Social Justice in Assessments</article-title>
<subtitle>Inclusivity in Higher Education Assessments</subtitle>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Joy.J</surname><given-names></given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sen.A</surname><given-names></given-names></name></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">UNITED STATES, Virginia Commonwealth University,</aff>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-12-17">
<day>17</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>G9</issue>
<fpage>33</fpage>
<lpage>35</lpage>
<abstract><p>The book, comprising 21 standalone chapters from 35 contributors, explores inclusivity in higher education assessments through societal, institutional, and interpersonal perspectives. It emphasizes the need for assessment practices that cater to diverse student populations, considering factors beyond traditional demographics. The review highlights the book’s strengths, including its multi-author approach, practical examples, and incorporation of indigenous knowledge. However, it also notes weaknesses such as a lack of field-specific guidelines and limited practical narratives. The book contributes significantly to assessment literature, offering valuable insights for researchers, educators, and policymakers seeking to develop more inclusive assessment practices in higher education. This review analyzes the book’s main arguments, strengths, weaknesses, and potential audience, providing a comprehensive overview of its content and relevance in the field of educational assessment.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated">
<kwd>higher education assessments</kwd>
<kwd>inclusion</kwd>
<kwd>book review.</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume24/4-Book-Review-for-Assessments.pdf" />
<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://globaljournals.org/scholarly-articles/book-review-for-assessments-for-inclusion-in-higher-education-promoting-equity-and-social-justice-in-assessments/" />
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Full Text</title>
<p>This review examines &quot;Inclusive Assessment in Higher Education: Promoting Equity and Social Justice in Assessment,&quot; edited by Rola Ajjawi, Joanna Tai, David Boud, and Trina Jorre De St Jorre. The book, comprising 21 standalone chapters from 35 contributors, explores inclusivity in higher education assessments through societal, institutional, and interpersonal perspectives. It emphasizes the need for assessment practices that cater to diverse student populations, considering factors beyond traditional demographics. The review highlights the book&#039;s strengths, including its multi-author approach, practical examples, and incorporation of indigenous knowledge. However, it also notes weaknesses such as a lack of field-specific guidelines and limited practical narratives. The book contributes significantly to assessment literature, offering valuable insights for researchers, educators, and policymakers seeking to develop more inclusive assessment practices in higher education. This review analyzes the book&#039;s main arguments, strengths, weaknesses, and potential audience, providing a comprehensive overview of its content and relevance in the field of educational assessment.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</article>