‘3⁄4 Law ‘ Revisited in Allometry

Chiranjib Patra
Chiranjib Patra *
Contact

Send Message

To: Author

‘3⁄4 Law ‘ Revisited in Allometry

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

QS4T9

‘3⁄4 Law ‘ Revisited in Allometry Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
Access Review Comments
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The success of ¾ law in allometry has been entirely due to the uncanny fitting to the datasets. But on the contrary, the proof of ¾ factor seemed to elude rather than more convincing 2/3 law seemed to be prevalent. In this communication based on recent findings due to Opto Droplet tool shows the reincarnation of the ¾ law. The analysis is based on the hypothesis of Dynamic Biological Mass and Real Biological Mass rather than simple biological mass. It can be seen that this hypothesis can lead to the distinction between malicious growth and good growth.

References

11 Cites in Article
  1. Geoffrey West,James Brown,Brian Enquist (2001). A general model for ontogenetic growth.
  2. Mk1 Hassan,M Hassan (2008). Condensation Driven Aggregation in one Dimension.
  3. M Hassan,M Hassan (2009). Emergence of fractal behavior in condensation-driven aggregation.
  4. Caterina Guiot (2006). The dynamic evolution of the power exponent in a universal growth model of tumors.
  5. A Rau (2002). Biological scaling and physics.
  6. Jayanth Banavar,Amos Maritan,Andrea Rinaldo (1999). Size and form in efficient transportation networks.
  7. Brian Hall,T Miyake (2004). Divide, accumulate, differentiate: cell condensation in skeletal development revisited.
  8. Elizabeth Wilson (2017). SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SHINES.
  9. Yongdae Shin,Joel Berry,Nicole Pannucci,Mikko Haataja,Jared Toettcher,Clifford Brangwynne (2017). Spatiotemporal Control of Intracellular Phase Transitions Using Light-Activated optoDroplets.
  10. Leonard Loeb (2004). The Kinetic Theory of Gases.
  11. Von Bertalanffy,Ludwig (1968). General system theory.
Show All References
Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Chiranjib Patra. 2020. "‘3⁄4 Law ‘ Revisited in Allometry". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - I: Interdisciplinary GJSFR-I Volume 20 (GJSFR Volume 20 Issue I2).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

  • Open Access
  • CC-BY-ND-NC 4.0
Download Article
Access OJS
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Not Found
Classification
GJSFR-I Classification FOR Code: 029999p
  • Submission ReceivedMarch 30, 2020
  • Peer Review Double Blind
    Handling Editor
  • Accepted April 22, 2020
  • Published May 2, 2020
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
June 4, 2020

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR
Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D
Article Matrices
Total Views: 731
Total Downloads: 61
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

‘3⁄4 Law ‘ Revisited in Allometry

Chiranjib Patra
Chiranjib Patra
  • Submission ReceivedMarch 30, 2020
  • Peer Review Double Blind
    Handling Editor
  • Accepted April 22, 2020
  • Published May 2, 2020