AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF: HTML, PHP, COLDFUSION, PERL, ASP.NET, JAVASCRIPT, VBSCRIPT, PYTON AND JSP

§ University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria

Send Message

To: Author

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF: HTML, PHP, COLDFUSION, PERL, ASP.NET, JAVASCRIPT, VBSCRIPT, PYTON AND JSP

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CST01X4S

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF: HTML, PHP, COLDFUSION, PERL, ASP.NET, JAVASCRIPT, VBSCRIPT, PYTON AND JSP Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background

Abstract

With the advent of the World Wide Web, several Web development languages have emerged and selecting a suitable one is never an easy task. Over the years, several attempts have been made to evaluate Web development tools vis-à-vis software measurement. This paper presents an experimental evaluation of nine web development languages. A shopping cart application was implemented in each of the Web development languages and the following factors were used in our evaluation: Platform, Performance, Functionality, Ease of use, Reliability, Program length, Portability, Database supports, Speed of execution, Maintainability, Object oriented programming, and Development cost.

References

17 Cites in Article
  1. An Introduction to Webbased Application Development.
  2. S Bakken (2000). Introduction to PHP‖.
  3. S Bakken (2000). Hire PHP Developer, PHP Developer, PHP Development Company, PHP Application Development, Hire PHP Programmer, PHP Developer.
  4. T Berner-Lee (2002). The World Wide Web -Past Present and Future-available at.
  5. (1998). WebMetric Tools.
  6. J Nielsen (1999). Designing Web usability: the practice of simplicity.
  7. J Nielsen,R Mack (1994). Ovum Evaluates: Web Development Tools.
  8. R Pandey,M Burnett (1993). Is it Easier to Write Matrix Manipulation Programs Visually or Textually? An Empirical Study.
  9. N Petreley (2001). Server-side HTML hell.
  10. L Prechelt (2000). An Empirical Evaluation of C. C++, Java, Perl, Pytton, Rexx and Tel.
  11. L Resenfeld,P Morville (1998). World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
  12. Robin Rice,Jed Perl (2002). Louisa Matthiasdottir.
  13. Summer (2008). Perl is Undecidable.
  14. Tim Berners-Lee (2001). Design Issues.
  15. N Waites,G Knott (1998). COMPUTING, 3 rd Edition.
  16. N Ward-Dutton (2000). Evaluation of Web based Information Technology.
  17. Webcriteria (2000). LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. UKNOWN REGISTRANTS OF www.wn0000.com, www.wn1111.com, www.wn2222.com, www.wn3333.com, www.wn4444.com, www.wn5555.com, www.wn6666.com, www.wn7777.com, www.wn8888.com, www.wn9999.com, www.112211.com, www.4456888.com, www.4489888.com, www.001148.com, and www.2289888.com, Defendants..

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. AMADIN I.F, NWELIH E. 1970. "AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF: HTML, PHP, COLDFUSION, PERL, ASP.NET, JAVASCRIPT, VBSCRIPT, PYTON AND JSP". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology GJCST Volume 10 (GJCST Volume 10 Issue 12).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
October 11, 2010

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 6.9K
Total Downloads: 473
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF: HTML, PHP, COLDFUSION, PERL, ASP.NET, JAVASCRIPT, VBSCRIPT, PYTON AND JSP

Dr. I.F
Dr. I.F University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
NWELIH E
NWELIH E