Conceptions of 19th Century Organizational Competition: Ideological Possibilities in the United States Railway Environment between 1870 and 1880

Alexandre Hochmann BÃ©har; Douglas InÃ¡cio Fragoso Ferreira; Raudyane Soares Marreiro

Conceptions of 19th Century Organizational Competition: Ideological Possibilities in the United States Railway Environment between 1870 and 1880

Alexandre Hochmann BÃ©har *

Contact

Douglas InÃ¡cio Fragoso Ferreira

Contact

Raudyane Soares Marreiro

Contact

Conceptions of 19th Century Organizational Competition: Ideological Possibilities in the United States Railway Environment between 1870 and 1880

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MBR28GC2

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Discursive constructions are laden with meanings tied to the historical and social context, which are linked. Historically, the development of concepts associated with Administration is presented in a de contextualized and anachronistic way, which could indicate a manipulative ideological potential. Therefore, this article analyzes the concept of competition, which is so dear to Administration, in the context of the origin of modern organization: the United States railway companies. Thus, through use of the Infinite Conceptual Puzzle, journalistic articles were selected from the American Railroad Journal, for an analysis of the conceptions of competition between 1870 and 1880. The analysis proposed indicates an approximation between the various perspectives of competition and the positive perspective.

References

40 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Mirko Alva Sánchez,Isabela Linhares,Carolina Maulaz,Bruna Frohlich,Artur Scheid,Matheus Fischer,Telpo Martins Dias,Daniela Da Rocha Estácio (2013). Implementación de un control de calidad de paciente específico en tratamientos de radioterapia con ArcCheck.
M Bacic (2011). Gestão de custos: uma abordagem sob o enfoque do processo competitivo e da estratégia empresarial.
T Barreto (2014). Ética ou ideologia empresarial?.
M Bauer,G Gaskell,N Allum,Qualidade (2008). quantidade e interesses do conhecimento: evitando confusões.
Alexandre Béhar (2019). Meritocracia enquanto ferramenta da ideologia gerencialista na captura da subjetividade e individualização das relações de trabalho: uma reflexão crítica.
A Béhar,M Feitosa (2019). Anais do(a) VI Congresso Brasileiro de Estudos Organizacionais.
A Béhar,M H; Feitosa (2020). Competição enquanto representação ideológica no ambiente ferroviário estadunidense: uma historiografia entre 1859 e 1869.
F Braudel (1996). Os "Brasis": suas línguas e seus intérpretes, em fontes portuguesas dos séculos XVI, XVII e XVIII.
Alfred Chandler (1999). The visible hand: the managerial Revolution in American business.
Stuart Clegg (1998). As organizações modern as.
Alessandra Costa,S De,Denise Barros,Paulo Martins (2010). Perspectiva histórica em Administração: novos objetos, novos problemas, novas abordagens.
John Creswell (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 3 rd ed.
Norman Denzin,Yvonna Lincoln,N Denzin,Lincoln (2006). A disciplina e a prática da pesquisa qualitativa.
M Dobb (2012). A evolução do capitalismo.
L Fernandes,M Morais (2004). História dos Estados Unidos: das origens ao século XXI.
Michel Foucault (2007). As palavras e as coisas: uma arqueologia das ciências humanas.
Renata Da Costa,Emiliane Pereira,Fabricio Silva,Edgar De Jesus,Fernando Souza Jr. (2008). Drug Micro-Carriers Based on Polymers and Their Sterilization.
Roy Jacques (2006). History, historiography and organization studies: The challenge and the potential.
L Karnal (2004). A formação da nação.
R Koselleck (1992). Uma história dos conceitos: problema teóricos e práticos.
R Koselleck (2006). Futuro passado: contribuição à semântica dos tempos históricos.
Eric Hobsbawm (1848). A era do capital.
Queila Matitz,Fabio Vizeu (2012). Construção e uso de conceitos em estudos organizacionais: por uma perspectiva social e histórica.
Guilherme Moura (2014). Hipergeneralizações: organizações são quase qualquer coisa em best-sellers de introdução à Administração.
C Perrow (2002). Organizing America: wealth, power, and the origins of corporate capitalism.
A Ramos (1983). A teoria administrativa e a utilização inadequada de conceitos.
M Reed (2010). Teorização Organizacional: Um campo historicamente contestado.
Rene Seifert,Fabio Vizeu (2015). Crescimento Organizacional: Uma Ideologia Gerencial?.
A Smith (1976). A riqueza das nações.
M Tragtenberg (2005). Administração, poder e ideologia.
Behlül Üsdiken,Alfred Kieser (2004). Introduction: History in Organisation Studies.
T Van Dijk (2006). Ideologia: una aproximación multidisciplinaria.
Teun Van Dijk,Ideologia (2015). Ideologia.
T Van Dijk (2017). Discurso e Poder.
F Vizeu (2010). Potencialidades da análise histórica nos estudos organizacionais brasileiros.
I Wallerstein (1974). O Sistema Mundial Moderno -II. O mercantilismo e a consolidação da encomiamundo europeia, 1600-1750.
M Weber (2006). História geral da economia.
R White (2012). Railroaded: the transcontinentals and the making of modern America.
C Wolmar (2012). The great railway revolution.
C Wolmar (2012). NATO’s War against Yugoslavia (1999).

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Alexandre Hochmann BÃ©har, Douglas InÃ¡cio Fragoso Ferreira, Raudyane Soares Marreiro. 2021. "Conceptions of 19th Century Organizational Competition: Ideological Possibilities in the United States Railway Environment between 1870 and 1880". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 21 (GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: M10

Submission ReceivedSeptember 9, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted September 30, 2021
Published October 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 4, 2021

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 815

Total Downloads: 34

All Trends