Loading menu…

Design of Radiator for Internal Combustion Engine with Tubes in Distribution of Sierpinski and Fins with Fractal Convolution

Design of Radiator for Internal Combustion Engine with Tubes in Distribution of Sierpinski and Fins with Fractal  Convolution

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

REC8EH3

Design of Radiator for Internal Combustion Engine with Tubes in Distribution of Sierpinski and Fins with Fractal  Convolution Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Introduction: Fractal geometries have demonstrated their efficiency in nature, for that reason a fractal geometry will be implemented to improve the transfer in a heat exchanger. This paper presents the design of the radiator for an internal combustion engine, where the location of the tubes through which the fluid passes are given by the distribution of Sierpinski and the perforations of the fins were made with fractal convolution. The outlet temperature respect to inlet temperature is studied and analyzed through a CFD software. This document shows theory fundamental used to design the radiator, with the implemented methodology, its results and conclusions.

I. INTRODUCTION

Since their appearance in 1975, fractals have been used in many areas related to engineering applications and have proven useful for increasing performance while using less volume. It has been shown that the self-likeness of fractal patterns could be used to create an effective distribution system over geometric surfaces.

Originally, they emerged as geometric shapes that are repeated in an iterated manner at different scales and that are self-similar. In the first decade of its development its geometric properties and its possible connections with other disciplines were obtained. Subsequently from the work of Nigmatullin [1], it began to incursion with connections of the area with fractional or fractional calculation, and from this, in the 21st century the possible applications to the various engineering. This work is part of the fractal theory to heat transfer, through simulated constructions by computer, which are feasible to build, on fins whose surface is fractal.

The essential characteristics of fractals is the irregularity of surfaces that can be repeated at different scales, this allows to improve heat transfer, for instance the surfaces of the fins under Euclidean geometries have been used in a classical way [2], [3]. One of the applications of surface engineering with fins is the radiator. By attaching the metal sheet to the water pipes at a defined temperature, the area of the convection surface increases and thus increases the heat transfer rate [4], if this is changed from geometry to fractal geometry, the transfer efficiency should be markedly improved.

Due to the increasing use of methods to improve the design of the heat exchanger in the industry, Compact heat exchangers have been developed which ones have a high proportion of heat transfer surface to heat exchanger volume, considering the fractal capacity to increase heat transfer. These are divided into fin tubes and fins plates [5] [6], which allow a high heat transfer coefficient in the high turbulence flow as that offered by a laminar flow in a flat tube situation [7].

This project investigated a tube heat exchanger based on the use of the Sierpinski fractal pattern where the spaces are not square but circular, and those are given by an operation fractal operation called convolution. Using computer modeling software, this indicated that with fractal iteration, an increase in heat transfer is achieved. Another research interest involving fractals in engineering has been the effects of fractal on surface diffusion rates.

In reference to radiators, they can use any type of compact exchangers, for the purpose of controlling the engine temperature when the engine is too high [8]. Based on the different models of cooling systems manufactured in [9], [10], [11], it decided to analyze the behavior of the design of the radiator with convolution fractal distribution fins, because in heat transfer fractal designs have shown better results than common geometries [12], [13].

The following simulations presented was made through CFD software since it allows us to study trends and properties [14].

II. METHODOLOGY

This project methodology is divided in four parts: fin calculus, fractal distributions, CAD and simulation.

a) Radiator Design

A radiator has four parts: inlet tank, outlet tank control cap and diaper (figure 1). The principal parameters are the diaper dimensions [15] which includes fins and tubes, these last parameters are those that will be considered to implement the fractal geometry.

Fig. 1: Parts of a radiator
Fig. 1: Parts of a radiator

Tubes design: The chosen parameters to realize the tube design were: Cross section (1), total internal perimeter (2), and hydraulic diameter (3).

Atube=Nt[thi⋅(twi−thi)+π4thi2]
Ptube=Nt[π⋅thi+2⋅(twi−thi)]
(3)Dhtube=4⋅AtubePtube

Where Nt is the radiator tubes number, thi is height of the tube, twi is the internal width of the tube.

Fin design: To design the heat transfer area on the side of the tube Aefect, tube and the area Ac, these can be expressed as:

Aeffect,tube=Nt[2⋅(twi−thi)−π⋅thi]
Ac=(Nt⋅tho+Nc⋅ch)⋅Lt

b) Design using the Sierpinski distribution

Considering the values obtained of (4) and (5), it was necessary to find an efficient distribution, for this reason it was decided to use the Sierpinski distribution to locate the tubes.

To determine the location of the centers of the holes, we considered the dimensions of the fin, because the fin has a rectangular form, this one was divided into four squares, and in each one we applied the Sierpinski distribution. Finally, we made a Matlab program which calculates the center and the location of the holes, the result of the algorithm is illustrated in figure 2.

Fig. 2: Result obtained from Matlab
Fig. 2: Result obtained from Matlab

c) Fractal Convolution

In 2015, Cotton, McLeman y Pinchock proposed process to combine two fractals [16], one into each other and they explored the combined effect on fractal dimension. This project explores that effect over a radiator and its effect calculated through a simulation. The construction follows the parameters exposed in [16], except that apart from the Sierpinski we build a new fractal (figure 3) and the result of the convolution between Sierpinski and the fractal designed will be determinate the radiator perforations.

Fig. 3: Fractal figure construction
Fig. 3: Fractal figure construction

The contribution in this project was the use of these ideas to simulate the behavior of the radiator. The figure 4 shows the result of the fractal convolution that was made, and the fractal dimension was calculated through HarFa v5.3.33 software [19], its result was illustrated in the figure 5.

Fig. 4: Fractal convolution
Fig. 4: Fractal convolution

Where, dS1 corresponds to the tubes distributions dimension, ds2 to the fractal figure designed dimension and DF is the product of the convolution between those fractals.

To calculate the fractal dimension, we used Harfa software and the operator form proposed by

Cotton, McLeman and Pinchock, and these are:

dS1=1.8927
dS2=0.7392
DF=ds1∗ds2=1.3991
Fig. 5: Harfa Results
Fig. 5: Harfa Results

d) Simulation

CAD: This model was made through a 3D software. With the values previously found, the measurements of the drill bits are determined for the diameters of the holes

Fig. 6: Fin design in CAD
Fig. 6: Fin design in CAD

Meshing: Because the geometry radiator had 36 tubes and more than 500 perforations, it was necessary to use a mesh with the right size to analyze in CFD study and skewness coefficient that was less than 0.86 to be compatible with Fluent. Table 1 shows the mesh parameters implemented.

and tubes passing through them, which corresponds to 1/8 "for the small hols and 3/8" for the central holes. The figure 6 shows the result of the convolution implemented in a fin design.

Table 1: Mesh Characteristics
Size Functioncurvature
Size3.3208 e-2 mm
nodes3409535
number of elements2835588

Parameters of CFD simulation: The computational model was set to a laminar model, with temperature and flow parameters shown in Table 2. The initial values of velocity and pressure was setting with SIMPLEC algorithm.

Table 2: Simulation Parameters
Convection (forced)80 W/K. m2
Fluid inlet temperature385 K
Ambient temperature300 K
Initial mass flow0.1 Kg/s

III. RESULTS

a) CFD

Simulation was performed in Ansys, it was made in order to analyze the temperature in the radiator in a time of 30 seconds. Figure 7 shows the difference between temperature at time t=1s and final temperature at time t=30s.

The obtained results show a reduction of 7K with regard to the initial temperature of the fluid. Considering that the analysis of the figure 8 is the temperature analyzed at the radiator outlet, where T (0)Outlet = 300K is the ambient temperature.

Fig. 8: Ansys results
Fig. 8: Ansys results

b) Data processing

The data processing in this radiator has the purpose to find the function that fits better to fractal design. The first step consists in taking a temperature model and adjusting to a Mitag-Leffler function. To realize it, it was necessary to analyze the temperature decreasing, taking as reference the fluid initial temperature at the inlet radiator as T (0)inlet=385K.

Figure 9 shows the change of temperature at the outlet of the radiator.

Fig. 9: Temperature drop at the radiator outlet
Fig. 9: Temperature drop at the radiator outlet

With the obtained data from figure 9, it proceeded to looking for Newton temperature classic model as the form:

(7)dTdt=K(T−Tm)

When estimating the model purchased with (7) we find that:

T(t)=6+70e−0.47t

When the adjustment analysis of the regression is performed, we find that:

R2=0.8456

Square root of the middle square = 9.87 Con valor p = 9, 09×10−18

Figure 10 illustrates the classical model (red line) and the points plot the data obtained from the simulation.

Fig. 10: Estimated classic model and simulation data
Fig. 10: Estimated classic model and simulation data

This is a lumped system, which temperature varies with the time, but remains unformed around the system at any time. The temperature of a lumped body of arbitrary shape with a mass m, volume V, surface area As, density ρ and specific heat Cp, initially at a temperature Ti, that is exposed to convection at a time t = 0 at a medium temperature T∞, with a heat transfer coefficient h is expressed as:

Where,

T(t)−T―∞=e−bt
Ti−T∞
(10)h=h⋅Asρ⋅V⋅Cp=hρ⋅Lc⋅Cp

For the design of this radiator, the parameters of table III were considered.

Table 3: System Characteristics
h80 W/ (K.m2)
Cp4,1813 J/ (Kg. K)
V0,000137 m3
ρ2700 Kg/m3
As0,003732 m2

Because the fractal form used is a fractal one and before the estimation by means of the calculation of Mittag-Leffler, definitions will be proposed that seek to link the parameters with the fractal dimensions, as follows:

Definition 1: We will call fractal dimension of convection (dF c) to: Being the natural logarithm of the coefficient of heat transfer coefficient h and the natural logarithm of the product of ρLcCp. This definition can be expressed as:

(11)aF=|ln⁡(h)ln⁡(ρ⋅Lc⋅Cp)―+DF|

Where DF is the fractal dimension of the convolution made in (6)

Replacing the equation 10 with Tabla 3 data, we obtained the value of dF = 0, 4084

Calculate the α value: However, since the construction is fractal it is suggested to adjust the classical model to a Mitag-Leffler function with a value of α

To find the value of α, it was taken as a reference the value of dF found in (11), and considering some observations given by Tatom [18] with some modifications appropriate to the project:

(12)α=12⋅(12−dF)

Which value of α=0,31.

If Mitag-Leffler function with a value of α=0.3 is presented in the form of a Fox H-function, we get:

(13)Eα(z)=H1,21,1[−z|(0,1)(0,1)(0,α)]1

As Haubold, Mathai and Saxena [17] indicates, when we performed the adjusting analysis with α=0.3, we find that: R2 decreases to 0.23, the square root of the average square decreases to 5.17 and p = 4, 59×10−5, as shown in figure 11.

Fig. 11: Mittag-Leffler Function with \alpha = 0.3
Fig. 11: Mittag-Leffler Function with α=0.3

The linearity is lost, but the adjustment is improved, which is in accordance with the fractal model, in a fractal geometry. When calculating the classic model obtained in term of the Fox H-function, we obtain:

(14)T(t)=6+70⋅H0,11,0[Z|(0,1)]paraZ=−0,47t

While Mitag-Leffler adjustment is:

T(t)=7+70⋅H1,21,1[−Z|(0,1),(0,α)(0,1)]paraZ=0,47tα=0,3

The improvement of the adjustment suggests that there must be a connection between the value α=0.3 and the fractal dimension of the proposed design convolution ds1* ds2 = 1.3991.

When making the adjustment, it resembles the theoretical calculation of [18]. However, the values proposed by Zhao should be changed by the values of the model adjusted for this case of the radiator, in the following way: μ2ω is the thermal conductivity of the fractal material designed using the Sierpinski distribution, ρω its density, cω specific heat, for the authors these values must be changed by their natural logarithm and the corresponding ω of the fractional order of the equation must be changed to the value α of this model.

IV. CONCLUSIONS

The simulation has shown that the fin surface in heat transfer and fractal shape and the yield of the fractal fins improve heat transfer or flow by improving fin efficiency.

The fundamental hypothesis on which the authors of the project are based is that since the fractals are self-similar objects and work at any scale, it is feasible to apply them at any scale of the engineering.

The Mittag-Leffler model with α=0,3, fits much better than Newton's classic model because it changes from a distribution of a Euclidean geometry to a fractal geometry, in the design of fins in a radiator and the distribution of tubes.

To estimate a fractal object under the condition of thermal conductivity, when making the estimation it is suggested that it must relate to the Fourier equation of fractional type in fractal medium as we saw in [18]

This simulation further suggests that the reconstruction of the fins not in the form of the classical geometric euclidean but fractal and with operations of convolution between fractals markedly improves the behavior of heat transfer. It is further suggested to explain these phenomena with the possible connection with fractional calculation, which allows innovation within heat transfer and its associated engineering, we will therefore say that we have a promising future through these ideas.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

To the vice-rectory of research of the Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, and to the project INV-ING 2612.

References

20 Cites in Article
  1. 1. R Nigmatullin (1992). Fractional integral and its physical interpretation. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 90(3), 242-251.
  2. 2. Giulio Lorenzini,Simone Moretti,Alessandra Conti (2011). Fin Shape Thermal Optimization Using Bejan’s Constructal Theory. Fin shape thermal optimization using Bejan's constructal theory
  3. 3. C Tola,M Nikbay (2015). Investigation of the effect of thickness, taper ratio and aspect ratio on fin flutter velocity of a model rocket using response surface method. 2015 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST)
  4. 4. Y Çengel,A Ghajar (2014). Heat and mass transfer. Heat and mass transfer, 169-172.
  5. 5. F Mayinger,J Klass (1992). Compact heat exchangers. Inst. Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser, 1(129), 35-49.
  6. 6. Ramesh Shah,Ralph Webb (1983). COMPACT HEAT EXCHANGERSCompact and Enhanced Heat Exchangers. Proceeding of Advanced Course in Heat Exchangers: Theory and Practice. ICHMT Symposium., 425-468.
  7. 7. M Witry,A Al-Hajeri,Bondok (2005). Thermal performance of automotive aluminium plate radiator. Applied Thermal Engineering, 25(8-9), 1207-1218.
  8. 8. G Cole (1998). Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between the California Air Resources Board and Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company. Final report. CARB Mailout
  9. 9. C Edward,Chiang,P George,Zintal Huang,John Chang,Johnson A One Dimensional Transient Compressible Flow Model for Cooling Air Flow Rate Computation.
  10. 10. A Kader,S Fellague,Donald Hu,Willoughby Determination of the Effects of Inlet Air Velocity and Temperature Distributions on the Performance of an Automotive Radiator. SAE Technical Paper Series, 940771.
  11. 11. Ngy Srun,A (1999). A Simple Engine Cooling System Simulation Model.
  12. 12. B Bani-Eqbal (1990). Speeding up fractal image compression. IEE Colloquium on Fractals in Signal and Image Processing, 1995, 2-2.
  13. 13. Yaroslav Sokolovskyy,Volodymyr Shymanskyi,Mar'iana Levkovych (2016). Mathematical modeling of non-isothermal moisture transfer and visco-elastic deformation in the materials with fractal structure. 2016 XIth International Scientific and Technical Conference Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 91-95.
  14. 14. (1981). Finite-Difference Techniques for Vectorized Fluid Dynamics Calculations. Finite-Difference Techniques for Vectorized Fluid Dynamics Calculations
  15. 15. C Romero,Y Carranza (2007). Rating of Thermal Capacity of a Heat Radiator. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Scientia et Technica Año, XIII
  16. 16. Nicholas Cotton,Cam Mcleman,Daniel Pinchock (2015). On Combining and Convolving Fractals. The College Mathematics Journal, 46(2), 99-108.
  17. 17. H Haubold,A Mathai,R Saxena (2011). Mittag‐Leffler Functions and Their Applications. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2011(1), 1-51.
  18. 18. D Zhao,X Yang,H Srivastava (2015). On the fractal heat transfer problems with local fractional calculus. Thermal Science, 19(5), 1867-1871.
  19. 19. Frank Tatom (1995). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FRACTIONAL CALCULUS AND FRACTALS. Fractals, 03(01), 217-229.
  20. 20. A Ponnapalli,P Jayasree (2015). An investigation of fractal antenna arrays for side lobe reduction with a fractal distribution of current. International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 1757-1761.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Luis Eduardo Llano Sánchez, Darío Domínguez, Martha Cecilia Melo, Carolina Gonzalez Rodríguez. 2020. "Design of Radiator for Internal Combustion Engine with Tubes in Distribution of Sierpinski and Fins with Fractal Convolution". Global Journal of Research in Engineering GJRE-A Volume 20 (GJRE Volume 20 Issue A3).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords
Classification
GJRE-A Classification FOR Code: 299902
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
December 23, 2020

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 795
Total Downloads: 56
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Design of Radiator for Internal Combustion Engine with Tubes in Distribution of Sierpinski and Fins with Fractal Convolution

Luis Sánchez
Luis Sánchez
Darío Domínguez
Darío Domínguez
Martha Melo
Martha Melo
Carolina Rodríguez
Carolina Rodríguez