Loading menu…

Difference Sequence Spaces of Second Order Defined by a Sequence of Moduli

§ Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh - 202002 (INDIA).

Send Message

To: Author

Difference Sequence Spaces of Second Order Defined by a Sequence of Moduli

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6H6HK

Difference Sequence Spaces of Second Order Defined by a Sequence of Moduli Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

In this article we introduce the sequence spaces and for a sequence of moduli, sequence of positive reals and the set of all sequences and establish some inclusion relations.

I. INTRODUCTION

Let N, R and C be the sets of all natural, real and complex numbers respectively. We write

ω = { x = ( x k ) : x k ∈ R o r C } ,

the space of all real or complex sequences. Let ℓ ∞ , c and c 0 denote the Banach spaces of bounded, convergent and null sequences respectively.

The following subspaces of ω were first introduced and discussed by Maddox [10-12].

l ( p ) = { x ∈ ω : ∑ k | x k | p k < ∞ }
ℓ ∞ ( p ) = { x ∈ ω : sup k | x k | p k < ∞ }
c ( p ) = { x ∈ ω : lim k | x k − l | p k = 0 ,  for some  l ∈ C }
c 0 ( p ) = { x ∈ ω : lim k | x k | p k = 0 }

where p = ( p k ) is a sequence of strictly positive real numbers.

The idea of difference sequence sets

X △ = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : △ x = ( x k − x k + 1 ) ∈ X }

where X = ℓ ∞ , c or c 0 was introduced by Kizmaz [6].

Kizmaz [6] defined the following sequence spaces,

ℓ ∞ ( △ ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ x k ) ∈ ℓ ∞ }
c ( △ ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ x k ) ∈ c }
c 0 ( △ ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ x k ) ∈ c 0 }

where △ x = ( x k − x k + 1 ) . These are Banach spaces with the norm

Ref

| | x | | △ = x 1 | + | | △ x | | ∞ .

Mikail [14] defined the sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( △ 2 ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ 2 x k ) ∈ ℓ ∞ }
c ( △ 2 ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ 2 x k ) ∈ c }
c 0 ( △ 2 ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ 2 x k ) ∈ c 0 }

Where ( △ 2 x ) = ( △ 2 x k ) = ( △ x k − △ x k + 1 )

The sequence spaces ℓ ∞ ( △ 2 ) , c ( △ 2 ) and c 0 ( △ 2 ) are Banach spaces with the norm

| | x | | △ = x 1 | + | x 2 | + | | △ 2 x | | ∞ .

Mikail and Colak [15] defined the sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( △ m ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ m x k ) ∈ ℓ ∞ }
c ( △ m ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ m x k ) ∈ c }
c 0 ( △ m ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( △ m x k ) ∈ c 0 }

where m ∈ N

△ 0 x = ( x k ) ,
△ x = ( x k − x k + 1 ) ,
△ m x = ( △ m − 1 x k − △ m − 1 x k + 1 ) ,

and so that

△ m x k = ∑ i = 0 m ( − 1 ) i [ m i ] x k + i .

and showed that these are Banach spaces with the norm

| | x | | △ = ∑ i = 1 m | x i | + | | △ m x | | ∞ .

Ref

Let U be the set of all sequences u = ( u k ) such that u k ≠ 0 ( k = 1 , 2 , 3 … ). Malkowsky[13] defined the following sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( u , △ ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( u k △ x k ) ∈ ℓ ∞ }
c ( u , △ ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( u k △ x k ) ∈ c }
c 0 ( u , △ ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( u k △ x k ) ∈ c 0 }

where u ∈ U .

The concept of paranorm (see[12]) is closely related to linear metric spaces. It is a generalization of that of absolute value.

Let X be a linear space. A function g : X ⟶ R is called paranorm, if for all x , y ∈ X ,

(PI) g ( x ) = 0 if x = 0,

(P2) g ( − x ) = g ( x ) ,

(P3) g ( x + y ) ≤ g ( x ) + g ( y ) ,

(P4) If ( λ n ) is a sequence of scalars with λ n → λ ( n → ∞ ) and x n , a ∈ X with x n → a ( n → ∞ ) , in the sense that g ( x n − a ) → 0 ( n → ∞ ) , in the sense that g ( λ n x n − λ a ) → 0 ( n → ∞ ) .

A paranorm g for which g ( x ) = 0 implies x = 0 is called a total paranorm on X, and the pair ( X , g ) is called a totally paranormed space.

The idea of modulus was structured by Nakano[16].

A function f : [ 0 , ∞ ) ⟶ [ 0 , ∞ ) is called a modulus if

(P1) f ( t ) = 0 if and only if t = 0 ,

(P2) f ( t + u ) ≤ f ( t ) + f ( u ) for all t , u ≥ 0 ,

(P3) f is increasing, and

(P4) f is continuous from the right at zero.

Ruckle [17-19] used the idea of a modulus function f to construct the sequence space

X ( f ) = { x = ( x k ) : ∑ k = 1 ∞ f ( | x k | ) < ∞ }

This space is an FK space. Ruckle[17-19] proved that the intersection of all such X ( f ) spaces is ϕ , the space of all finite sequences.

The space X ( f ) is closely related to the space l 1 which is an X ( f ) space with f ( x ) = x for all real x ≥ 0 . Thus Ruckle[17-19] proved that, for any modulus f .

X ( f ) ⊂ l 1 and X ( f ) α = ℓ ∞

Ref

The space X ( f ) is a Banach space with respect to the norm

| | x | | = ∑ k = 1 ∞ f ( | x k | ) < ∞ .

Spaces of the type X ( f ) are a special case of the spaces structured by Gramsch in[4]. From the point of view of local convexity, spaces of the type X ( f ) are quite pathological. Symmetric sequence spaces, which are locally convex have been frequently studied by Garling[2-3], Köthe[9] and Ruckle[17-19].

Kolk [7-8] gave an extension of X ( f ) by considering a sequence of moduli F = ( f k ) and defined the sequence space

X ( F ) = { x = ( x k ) : ( f k ( | x k | ) ) ∈ X }

Khan and Lohani [5] defined the following sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( u , △ , F ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : sup k ≥ 0 f k ( | u k △ x k | ) < ∞ }
c ( u , △ , F ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ f k ( | u k △ x k − l | ) = 0 , l ∈ C }
c 0 ( u , △ , F ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ f k ( | u k △ x k | ) = 0 }

If we take x k instead of △ x , then we have the following sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( u , F ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : sup k ≥ 0 f k ( | u k x k | ) < ∞ }
c ( u , F ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ f k ( | u k x k − l | ) = 0 , l ∈ C }
c 0 ( u , F ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ f k ( | u k x k | ) = 0 }

Asma and Colak[1] defined the following sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( u , △ , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( | u k △ x k | ) p k ∈ ℓ ∞ ( p ) }
c ( u , △ , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( | u k △ x k | ) p k ∈ c ( p ) }

Ref

c 0 ( u , △ , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : ( | u k △ x k | ) p k ∈ c 0 ( p ) }

where u ∈ U , p = ( p k ) be any sequence of positive reals.

Khan and Lohani [5] defined the following sequence spaces

ℓ ∞ ( u , △ , F , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : sup k ≥ 0 ( f k ( | u k △ x k | ) ) p k < ∞ }
c ( u , △ , F , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k △ x k − l | ) ) p k = 0 , l ∈ C }
c 0 ( u , △ , F , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k △ x k | ) ) p k = 0 }

which are paranormed spaces paranormed with

Q ( x ) = sup k ≥ 0 ( f k ( | u k △ x k | ) ) p k ) 1 H ≤ a

where H = max ( 1 , sup k ≥ 0 p k ) and a = f k ( l ) , l = sup k ≥ 0 ( | u k △ x k | ) .

II. MAIN RESULTS

In this article we introduce the following class of sequence spaces.

ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : sup k ≥ 0 ( f k ( | u k △ 2 x k | ) ) p k < ∞ }
c ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k △ 2 x k − l | ) ) p k = 0 , l ∈ C }
c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) = { x = ( x k ) ∈ ω : lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k △ 2 x k | ) ) p k = 0 }

Theorem 2.1. ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F ) is a Banach space with norm

| | x | | △ 2 = sup k ≥ 0 ( f k ( | u k △ 2 x k | ) ) ≤ α ,

where α = f k ( l ) and l = sup k ≥ 0 ( | u k △ 2 x k | ) .

Proof. Let ( x i ) be a cauchy sequence in ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F ) for each i ∈ N . Let r , x 0 be fixed. Then for each ϵ r x 0 > 0 there exists a positive integer N such that

| | x i − x j | | △ 2 < ϵ r x 0  for all  i , j ≥ N

Using the definition of norm, we get

sup k ≥ 0 f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | | | x i − x j | | △ 2 ) ≤ α ,  for all  i , j ≥ N

Notes ie,

f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | ‖ x i − x j ‖ △ 2 ) ≤ α , forall i , j ≥ N

Hence we can find r > 0 with f k ( r x 0 2 ) ≥ α such that

f k ( | u k ( Δ 2 x k i − Δ 2 x k j ) | ‖ x i − x j ‖ Δ 2 ) ≤ f k ( r x 0 2 )
| u k ( Δ 2 x k i − Δ 2 x k j ) | ‖ x i − x j ‖ Δ 2 ≤ r x 0 2

This implies that

| u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | ≤ r x 0 2 ϵ r x 0 = ϵ 2

Since u k ≠ 0 for all k , we have

| \triangle^ {2} x _ {k} ^ {i} - \triangle^ {2} x _ {k} ^ {j} | \leq \frac {\epsilon}{2} \quad \text { for all i, j\geq N }

Hence ( △ 2 x k i ) is a cauchy sequence in R.

Using the continuity of F = ( f k ) we can show that

sup k ≥ N f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − lim j → ∞ △ 2 x k j ) | ) ≤ α ,
sup k ≥ N f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k ) | ) ≤ α ,

since ( x i ) ∈ ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F ) and F = ( f k ) is continuous it follows that x ∈ ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F ) . Thus ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F ) is complete.

Theorem 2.2. ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) is a complete paranormed space with

Q u ( x ) = sup k ≥ 0 ( f k ( | u k △ 2 x k | ) p k ) 1 H ≤ α

where H = max ( 1 , sup k ≥ 0 p k ) and α = f k ( l ) , l = sup k ≥ 0 ( | u k △ 2 x k | ) .

Notes

Proof. Let ( x i ) be a cauchy sequence in ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) for each i ∈ N .

Let r > 0 , x 0 be fixed. Then for each ϵ r x 0 > 0 there exists a positive integer N such that

Q _ {u} (x ^ {i} - x ^ {j}) _ {\triangle^ {2}} < \frac {\epsilon}{r x _ {0}} \quad \text { for all i, j\geq N }

Using the definition of paranorm, we get

\sup _ {k \geq 0} f _ {k} (\frac {| u _ {k} (\triangle^ {2} x _ {k} ^ {i} - \triangle^ {2} x _ {k} ^ {j}) |}{Q _ {u} (x ^ {i} - x ^ {j}) _ {\triangle^ {2}}}) ^ {\frac {p _ {k}}{H}} \leq \alpha , \quad \text { for all i, j\geq N }

ie,

f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | Q u ( x i − x j ) △ 2 ) p k ≤ α , foralli , j ≥ N

Hence we can find r > 0 with f k ( r x 0 2 ) ≥ α such that

f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | Q u ( x i − x j ) △ 2 ) ≤ f k ( r x 0 2 )
| u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | Q u ( x i − x j ) △ 2 ≤ r x 0 2

This implies that

| u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j ) | ≤ r x 0 2 ϵ r x 0 = ϵ 2

Since u k ≠ 0 for all k , we have

| △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k j | ≤ ϵ 2  for all  i , j ≥ N

Hence ( △ 2 x k i ) is a cauchy sequence in R.

Using the continuity of F = ( f k ) we can show that

sup k ≥ N f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − lim j → ∞ △ 2 x k j ) | ) p k H ≤ α ,
sup k ≥ N f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k i − △ 2 x k ) | ) p k H ≤ α ,

since ( x i ) ∈ ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) and F = ( f k ) is continuous it follows that x ∈ ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) . Thus ℓ ∞ ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) is complete.

Theorem 2.3. Let 0 < p k ≤ q k < ∞ for each k . Then we have

Notes

c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) ⊆ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , q )

Proof. Let x ∈ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) that is

lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) p k = 0

This implies that

f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ≤ 1

for sufficiently large k, since modulus function is non decreasing.

Hence we get

lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) q k ≤ lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) p k = 0

Therefore x ∈ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , q )

Theorem 2.4. (a) Let 0 < inf p k ≤ p k ≤ 1 . Then we have

c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) ⊆ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F ) .

(b) Let 1 ≤ p k ≤ sup k p k < ∞ . Then we have

c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F ) ⊆ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) .

Proof. (a) Let x ∈ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p ) , that is

lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) p k = 0

Since 0 < inf p k ≤ p k ≤ 1 ,

lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) ≤ lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) p k = 0

Hence x ∈ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F ) .

(b) Let p k ≥ 1 for each k and sup p k < ∞ .

Suppose that x ∈ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F ) .

Then for each ϵ > 0 there exists a positive integer N such that

Notes

f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ≤ ϵ  for all  k ≥ N

Since 1 ≤ p k ≤ sup k p k < ∞ , we have

lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) p k ≤ lim k → ∞ ( f k ( | u k ( △ 2 x k ) | ) ) ≤ ϵ < 1

Therefore x ∈ c 0 ( u , △ 2 , F , p )

References

20 Cites in Article
  1. 1. (2010). BIBLIOGRAFÍAY REFERENCIAS. En camino de una justicia global, 1, 141-152.
  2. 2. Ç Asma,R Çolak (2000). ON THE KÖTHE-TOEPLITZ DUALS OF SOME GENERALIZED SETS OF DIFFERENCE SEQUENCES. Demonstratio Mathematica, 33(4), 797-804.
  3. 3. D Garling (1966). On Symmetric Sequence Spaces. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, s3-16(1), 85-106.
  4. 4. D Garling (1968). Symmetric bases of locally convex spaces. Studia Mathematica, 30(2), 163-181.
  5. 5. Bernhard Gramsch (1967). Die Klasse metrischer linearer R�ume ??. Mathematische Annalen, 171(1), 61-78.
  6. 6. V A Khan,Q Lohani (2006). Difference sequence spaces defined by a sequence of moduli. Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics, 30, 1061-1067.
  7. 7. H Kizmaz (1981). On Certain Sequence Spaces. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 24(2), 169-176.
  8. 8. E Kolk (1993). On strong boundedness and summability with respect to a sequence of modulii. Acta Comment.Univ.Tartu, 960, 41-50.
  9. 9. Enno Kolk (1994). On Generalized Orlicz Sequence Spaces Defined by Double Sequences. Fasciculi Mathematici, 55(1), 65-80.
  10. 10. Gottfried Köthe (1970). Topological Vector Spaces. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 1, 123-201.
  11. 11. I Maddox (1970). Elements of Functional Analysis. Elements of Functional Analysis
  12. 12. I Maddox (1986). Sequence spaces defined by a modulus. Math. Camb. Phil. Soc, 100, 161-166.
  13. 13. I Maddox (1969). Some Properties of Paranormed Sequence Spaces. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, s2-1(1), 316-322.
  14. 14. E Malkowsky (1996). Note on the KÖthe-Toeplitz duals of generalized sets of bounded and convergent difference sequences. J.Analysis, 4, 81-91.
  15. 15. Mikail (1993). On some difference sequence spaces. Dogra-Tr:J:Math, 17, 18-24.
  16. 16. Colak Mikail,R (1995). On some generalized difference sequence spaces. Soochow: J: of Math, 21(4), 377-386.
  17. 17. H Nakano (1953). Concave modulars. J. Math Soc. Japan, 5, 29-49.
  18. 18. William Ruckle (1968). On perfect symmetric BK spaces. Mathematische Annalen, 175(2), 121-126.
  19. 19. William Ruckle (1967). Symmetric Coordinate Spaces and Symmetric Bases. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 19, 828-838.
  20. 20. William Ruckle (1973). FK Spaces in Which the Sequence of Coordinate Vectors is Bounded. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 25(5), 973-978.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Khalid Ebadullah, Kibreab Gebreselassie. 2021. "Difference Sequence Spaces of Second Order Defined by a Sequence of Moduli". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - F: Mathematics & Decision GJSFR-F Volume 21 (GJSFR Volume 21 Issue F4).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

A scholarly article on difference sequence spaces, highlighting second-order defined sequence spaces for academic research.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-F Classification MSC 2010: 11B50
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
October 9, 2021

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 518
Total Downloads: 37
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Difference Sequence Spaces of Second Order Defined by a Sequence of Moduli

Khalid Ebadullah
Khalid Ebadullah <p>Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh – 202002 (INDIA).</p>
Kibreab Gebreselassie
Kibreab Gebreselassie