Domestic R&D Intensity, Technology Transfer and Growth of Productivity: An Empirical Investigation of Tunisian Case

Domestic R&D Intensity, Technology Transfer and Growth of Productivity: An Empirical Investigation of Tunisian Case

Ahmed Bellakhdhar * §

Contact

Tunis University

Domestic R&D Intensity, Technology Transfer and Growth of Productivity: An Empirical Investigation of Tunisian Case

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MBREXR2N

Domestic R&D Intensity, Technology Transfer and Growth of Productivity: An Empirical Investigation of Tunisian Case Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the determinants of productivity growth in the Tunisian economy context over the period 1976 to 2010. Our theoretical model incorporates as key variables, domestic innovation, human capital, distance to technology frontier and external technology spillovers through import of high-tech products and foreign direct investments. Empirical results identify that the impact of domestic R&D intensity on the productivity growth is negative but not significant in all alternative regressions. The effect of import of technologically advanced products is positive and more enhanced by the distance to technology frontier but the effect of foreign direct investment is significantly negative. Our findings confirm also that human capital has a positive impact on technology accumulation in Tunisia but not highly significant. Its role is rather more important in the assimilation and absorption of foreign technology.

References

47 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Blomström,A Kokko (2000). Foreign Direct Investment, Firm and Host Countries strategies.
Bm (2000). Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 1999-2000.
E Borensztein,J De Gregorio,W Lee (1995). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth.
B Botirjan (2013). FDI and Total Factor Productivity Growth: New Macro Evidence.
Yazidi Bouoiyour (2000). Productivité et Ouverture en Afrique du Nord, Article présenté au colloque international: Ouverture économique et développement.
Gavin Cameron (2003). Why Did UK Manufacturing Productivity Growth Slow Down in the 1970s and Speed Up in the 1980s?.
L Cecchini,C Lai-Tong (2008). The Links between Openness and Productivity in Mediterranean Countries.
I Chellouf,O Outtara,H Dou (1999). La Nécessité de la Veille Technologique en Tunisie.
T Coe,E Helpman (1995). International R&D Spillovers.
T Coe,Helpman,W Hoffmaister (1997). North-South R&D Spillovers.
Martin Dangerfield (2000). CEFTA and Reintegration of Central and Eastern Europe.
E Dinopoulos,P Thompson (1998). Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects.
Jonathan Eaton,Samuel Kortum (1999). International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement.
J Fagerberg (1994). Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates.
A Gerschenkron (1952). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective.
D Gollin (2002). Getting Income Shares Right.
Rachel Griffith,Stephen Redding,John Van Reenen (2003). R&D and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence*.
R Griffith,S Redding,J Van Reenen (2004). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries.
Gene Grossman,Elhanan Helpman (1991). Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth.
Joonkyung Ha,Peter Howitt (2007). Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi‐Endogenous Growth Theory.
R Hall,C Jones (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others.
Menelgado Hammami (2001). Ouverture et Externalités Internationales de la R&D : Une Analyse du Sud de la Méditerranée.
M Hatem (2007). Le système national de recherche en Tunisie, Projet ESTIME, Contrat n°510696 Appel d'offre.
Peter Howitt (1999). Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R. & D. Inputs Growing.
Peter Howitt (2000). Endogenous Growth and Cross-Country Income Differences.
Iéq (2001). Impact de l'Instauration d'une Zone de Libre-échange avec l'Union Européenne.
Iéq (2008). Ateliers et conférences sur la recherche économique.
R Islam (2010). Human Capital Composition, Proximity to Technology Frontier and Productivity Growth.
C Jones (1995). R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth.
Samuel Kortum (1997). Research, Patenting, and Technological Change.
Richard Kneller,Philip Stevens (2006). Frontier Technology and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from OECD Manufacturing Industries*.
R Lichtenberg,B Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (1998). International R&D Spillovers: A Comment.
Jakob Madsen,Michael Mcaleer (2000). Direct tests of the permanent income hypothesis under uncertainty, inflationary expectations and liquidity constraints.
B Madsen (2008). Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data.
E Mansfield,A Romeo (1980). Technology Transfer to Overseas Subsidiaries by U.S.-Based Firms.
J Mincer (1974). Schooling, Experience and Earnings.
R Nelson,S Phelps (1966). Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth.
Richard Nelson,Gavin Wright (1992). The Erosion of U.S. Technological Leadership as a Factor in Postwar Economic Convergence.
Mimica Neven (2002). How are Stabilisation and Association Agreements paving the way to EU Membership?.
Paul Romer (1990). Endogenous Technological Change.
Andreas Savvides,Marios Zachariadis (2005). International Technology Diffusion and the Growth of TFP in the Manufacturing Sector of Developing Economies.
P Segerstrom (1998). Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects.
A Tlili (2006). Retombées de la R&D Domestique et Étrangère sur la Productivité Totale des Facteurs: Un Essai d'Évaluation Pour le Cas de la Tunisie.
Jérôme Vandenbussche,Philippe Aghion,Costas Meghir (2006). Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital.
A Young (1998). Growth without Scale Effects.
Bin Xu (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth.
Marios Zachariadis (2003). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: a test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ahmed Bellakhdhar Bellakhdhar. 1970. "Domestic R&D Intensity, Technology Transfer and Growth of Productivity: An Empirical Investigation of Tunisian Case". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 19 (GJMBR Volume 19 Issue B4).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 19 Issue B4

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-B Classification JEL Code: C51

D24

F14

O33

Published September 4, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 4, 2019

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 287K

Total Downloads: 5

All Trends