Estimation of Genetic Parameters in Coffea canephora Var. Robusta

§ Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research

Send Message

To: Author

Estimation of Genetic Parameters in Coffea canephora Var. Robusta

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

8986A

Estimation of Genetic Parameters in Coffea canephora Var. Robusta Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to assess the genetic parameters in Coffea Robusta clones using mixed model. The experiments were carried out during four years, in complete block design, and one plant per plot, at Oratorio of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. The clones were evaluated for vigor, reaction to rust, reaction to cercospera, number of or to tropicos branches, number of plegiotropics branches, plant height, diameter of stem, fruit maturity, diameter of canopy, fruit size and production of fruits. The data were analyzed using the mixed model methodology (REML/BLUP) of Selegen software for estimation of genetic parameters in C.canephora breeding. The results showed a low genetic variability among the clones of Robusta for all the evaluated traits. On the other hand, relatively high residual coefficient of variation for most of the traits was recorded implying that these traits seem to be highly influenced by the environmental variation.

References

40 Cites in Article
  1. 1. E Anim-Kwapong,A Boamah (2010). Genetic and environmental correlations between bean yield and agronomic traits in Coffeacanephora. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 2(4), 64-072.
  2. 2. S Beer,J Goffreda,T Phillips,J Murphy,M Sorrells (1993). Assessment of genetic variation in Arena sterilis using morphological traits, isozymes and RFLPs. Crop Sci, 33, 1386-1393.
  3. 3. R Bernardo (2002). Breeding for quantitative traits in Plants. Breeding for quantitative traits in Plants, 369.
  4. 4. Alex Carvalho,Antônio Mendes,Gladyston Carvalho,Cesar Botelho,Flávia Gonçalves,André Ferreira (2010). Correlação entre crescimento e produtividade de cultivares de café em diferentes regiões de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 45(3), 269-275.
  5. 5. R Coste,Caféierset Cafés,; Maisonneuve,G Larose (1989). Agence de cooperation Culturelle et Technique. Agence de cooperation Culturelle et Technique, 373.
  6. 6. Eduardo Cândido,Roberto De Azevedo,Izabel De Azevedo,Enivaldo Minette (2004). Análise inversa da curva do ensaio pressiométrico utilizando o modelo hiperbólico. Ciência & Engenharia, 26(1), 59-67.
  7. 7. Cruz Vencovsky,R,Silva Tosello,G (1993). Comparison of gains from selectionamong corn progenies, based on different criteria. Rev. Bras. Genet, 16, 79-89.
  8. 8. P Cubry,P Musoli,H Legnate,D Pot,F De Bellis,V Poncet,F Anthony,M Dufour,T Leroy (2008). Diversity in coffee assessed with SSR markers: Structure of the genus Coffea and perspectives for breeding. Genome, 51, 50-63.
  9. 9. D De Vienne,Santonis Falque,M (2003). Principal Sources of Molecular Markers. Molecular Markers in Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, 3-41.
  10. 10. K Gichurue (2007). Characterization of genetic resistance to Coffee Berry Disease (Colletotrichumkahawae Waller and Bridge) in Arabica coffee (CoffeaarabicaL.) that is introgressed from CoffeacanephoraPierre. Characterization of genetic resistance to Coffee Berry Disease (Colletotrichumkahawae Waller and Bridge) in Arabica coffee (CoffeaarabicaL.) that is introgressed from CoffeacanephoraPierre
  11. 11. B Gichimu,C Omondi (2010). Morphological Characterization of Five Newly Developed Lines of Arabica Coffee as Compared to Commercial Cultivars in Kenya. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 4(4), 238-246.
  12. 12. J Duarte,R Vencovsky (2001). Estimação e predição por modelo linear misto com ênfase na ordenação de médias de tratamentos genéticos. Scientia Agricola, 58(1), 109-117.
  13. 13. D Falconer (1960). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Introduction to quantitative genetics
  14. 14. Douglas Falconer,Trudy Mackay (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 464.
  15. 15. Anderson Venâncio,Gisele Moreira,Bruna Balduino,Michelle Gonçalves,Mônica Silva,Juliana Pinelli,Monique Silva,Fernanda Pereira,Fernanda Abreu,Roberta Piccoli (2004). Caracterização e perfil de resistência de bactérias Gram-positivas em tanques de expansão. Revista Agraria Academica, 6(1), 103-112.
  16. 16. L Hazel (1943). The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics, 28, 476-490.
  17. 17. C Henderson (1984). Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Applications of linear models in animal breeding
  18. 18. C Henderson (1974). Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics, 31, 423-447.
  19. 19. C Henderson (1963). Selection index and expected genetic advance. Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, 982, 141-163.
  20. 20. T Leroy,C Montagnon,C Cilas,A Yapo,P Charmetant,A Eskes (1997). Reciprocal recurrent selection applied to Coffea canephora Pierre. III. Genetic gains and results of first cycle intergroup crosses. Euphytica, 95(3), 347-354.
  21. 21. O Maurin,A Davis,M Chester,E Mvungi,Y Jaufeerally-Fakim,M Fay (2007). Towards a Phylogeny for Coffea (Rubiaceae): Identifying Well-supported Lineages Based on Nuclear and Plastid DNA Sequences. Annals of Botany, 100(7), 1565-1583.
  22. 22. Miranda Perecin,D Pereira,A (2005). Produtividade e resistência à ferrugem do cafeeiro (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. Et. Br.) de progênies F5 de Catuaí Amarelo com o Híbrido de Timor. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 29, 1195-1200.
  23. 23. C Montagnon,Flori Cilas,C (2001). A new method to assess competition in coffee clonal traits with single tree in Cote'd' Ivoire. Agron.J, 93, 227-231.
  24. 24. A Olivera,A Pereira,F Silva,J Resende,C Botelho,R Carvalhog (2011). Prediction of genetic gains from selection in Arabica coffee progênies. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 2, 106-113.
  25. 25. Eder Oliveira,Vanderlei Santos,Diego Lima,Marlos Machado,Rangel Lucena,Tiago Motta,Milene Castellen (2008). Seleção em progênies de maracujazeiro-amarelo com base em índices multivariados. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 43(11), 1543-1549.
  26. 26. Nayani Prakash,Marie-Christine Combes,Stéphane Dussert,Somanna Naveen,Philippe Lashermes (2005). Analysis of genetic diversity in Indian robusta coffee genepool (Coffea canephora) in comparison with a representative core collection using SSRs and AFLPs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52(3), 333-343.
  27. 27. M Petek,T Sera,Fonseca (2008). Predição de valores genéticos aditivos na seleção visando obter cultivares de café mais resistentes à ferrugem. Bragantia, 67, 133-140.
  28. 28. H Piepho,J Mohring,Melchinger Buchse,A (2008). BLUP for phenotypic selection and variety test. Euphytica, 161, 209-228.
  29. 29. P Sampaio,M Resende,A Araujo (2002). Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos e métodos de seleção para o melhoramento genético de Pinus ocarpa Schiede. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37, 625-636.
  30. 30. R Searls (1971). Linear Models. Linear Models
  31. 31. T Sera (2001). Coffee Genetic Breeding at IAPAR. Cropp Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 1(2), 179-199.
  32. 32. M Silvarolla,Guerreiro Filho,O Lima,M Fazuoli,L (1997). Avaliação de progênies derivadas do Híbrido de Timor com resistência ao agente da ferrugem. Bragantia, 56, 47-58.
  33. 33. V Sureshkumar,K Nikhila,N Prakash,Mohanan Interrelationship and Association of Characters in Robusta Coffee (CoffeaCanephora Var. Robusta). Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 2(2), 98-104.
  34. 34. M Ramalho,B Carvalo,J Nunes (2013). Perspectives for the use of quantitative genetics in breeding of autogamous plants. ISRN Genetics, 20.
  35. 35. M Resende (2001). Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos e predição de valores genotípicos nomelhoramento do cafeeiro pelo procedimento REML/BLUP. Bragantia, 60, 185-193.
  36. 36. M Resende (2002). Genética biométrica e estatística no melhoramento de plantas perenes. Genética biométrica e estatística no melhoramento de plantas perenes, 975.
  37. 37. Marcos Resende (2008). Software Selegen-REML/BLUP: a useful tool for plant breeding. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 16(4), 330-339.
  38. 38. W Rodrigues,H Vieira,D Barbora,G Souza Filho (2013). Adaptability and genotipic stability of Coffeaarabicagenoptypes based on REML/BLUP analysis in Rio Janeiro state, Brazil. Genet. Mol. Res, 12, 2391-2399.
  39. 39. D Walyaro,H Vossen (1978). Early determination of yield potential in arabica coffee by applying index selection. Euphytica, 28, 465-472.
  40. 40. F Yates (1937). The Design and Analysis of Factorial Experiments. Imperial Bureau of Soil Sciences, Tech. Comm, 35.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Bayisa Asefa Bikila. 2017. "Estimation of Genetic Parameters in Coffea canephora Var. Robusta". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 17 (GJSFR Volume 17 Issue D5).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-D Classification FOR Code: 070199
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
November 6, 2017

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 961
Total Downloads: 67
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Estimation of Genetic Parameters in Coffea canephora Var. Robusta

Bayisa Bikila
Bayisa Bikila Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research