Evaluation of Shoot Fly Resistance through SSR Markers in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary

Evaluation of Shoot Fly Resistance through SSR Markers in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary * §

Contact

§ Maharana Pratap university of Agriculture and techno...

Evaluation of Shoot Fly Resistance through SSR Markers in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

PJ42Q

Evaluation of Shoot Fly Resistance through SSR Markers in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out with three shoot fly resistant, one having recovery resistance and four susceptible genotypes and their twenty eight crosses. Out of 21 SSR primers used 6 were amplified and gave 12 bands and 327 clear fragments. Out of 12 bands 5 were polymorphic and level of average polymorphism was 41.67 per cent. The most informative band was of Xtxp 88 at 250 bp. The correlation between early vigour, glossiness and trichome density was significant positive. The average value of glossiness (p=0.00) and trichome density (p=0.02) was significantly low in the genotypes having Xtxp88 250 bp band. Correlation of marker Xtxp88 (250 bp) with glossiness (-0.58) and trichome density (-0.38) was significant and negative. In the stepwise regression analysis only one band Xtxp88 250 bp was entered and explained 33.20 and 14.70 percent variability of glossiness and trichome density, respectively, indicating that the band Xtxp88 250 bp was weakly associated with susceptibility to shoot fly.

References

23 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. H Agrama,G Widle,J Reese,L Campbell,M Tuinstra (2002). Genetic mapping of QTLs associated with greenbug resistance and tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104(8), 1373-1378.
2. D Apotikar,D Venkateswarlu,R Ghorade,R Wadaskar,J Patil,P Kulwal (2011). Mapping of shoot fly tolerance loci in sorghum using SSR markers. Journal of Genetics, 90(1), 59-66.
3. D Bhattramakki,J Dong,A Chhabra,G Hart (2000). An integrated SSR and RFLP linkage map of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Genome, 43, 988-1002.
4. M Dhillon,H Sharma,R Singh,J Naresh (2005). Mechanism of resistance to shoot fly (A. soccata) in sorghum. Euphytica, 144(3), 301-312.
5. M Dhillon,H Sharma,R Folkertsma,S Chandra (2005). Genetic divergence and molecular characterization of sorghum hybrids and their parents for reaction to Atherigona soccata (Rondani). Euphytica, 149, 199-210.
6. H Doggett (1988). Sorghum. Sorghum, 1-12.
7. J Doyle,J Doyle (1987). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.
8. S Agale,Rajeev Gupta,G Rangarao,S Gopalakrishnan,Jagdish Jaba,S Wani (1999). EFFICACY OF SOME SELECTED BIOPESTICIDES AGAINST HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUB.) USING DETACHED LEAF BIOASSAY IN CHICKPEA. Journal of Biopesticides, 10(2), 99-104.
9. S Gomashe,M Misal,K Ganapathy,S Rakshit (2010). Correlation studies for shoot fly resistance traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(4), 899-902.
10. P Gowda,G Xu,R Frederiksen,C Magill (1995). DNA markers for downy mildew resistance genes in sorghum. Genome, 38, 823-826.
11. P Jaccard (1908). Nouvelles rescherches sur la distribution florale. Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Natulelles Bulletin, 44, 233-270.
12. M Jotwani (1982). Factors reducing sorghum yields-insect pests. In: Sorghum the Eighties. Characteristics, linkage map positions, and allelic differentiation of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench DNA simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 101, 438-448.
13. A Paterson,Y Lin,Z Li,K Schertz,J Doebley,S Pinson,S Lin,J Stanzel,J Irvine (1995). Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science, 269, 1714-1718.
14. M Pereira,M Lee (1995). Identification of genomic regions affecting plant height in sorghum and maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 90(3-4), 380-388.
15. A Pont (1972). A review of the oriental species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera:Muscidae) of economic importance. Control of sorghum shoot fly, 27-104.
16. A Pont,J Deeming (2001). A shoot-fly Atherigona tritici sp. n. (Diptera: Muscidae), attacking wheat Triticum aestivum in Egypt. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 91(4), 297-300.
17. H Sharma (1993). Host plant resistance to insects in sorghum and its role in integrated pest management. Crop Prot, 12, 11-34.
18. Y Tao,R Henzell,D Jordan,D Butler,A Kelly,C Mcintyre (2000). Identification of genomic regions associated with stay green in sorghum by testing RILs in multiple environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100(8), 1225-1232.
19. Y Tao,D Jordan,R Henzell,C Mcintyre (1998). Construction of an integrated sorghum genetic map in a sorghum RIL population by using probes from different sources and its alignment with other sorghum maps. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, 49, 729-736.
20. G Taramino,R Tarchini,S Ferrario,M Lee,M Pe (1997). Characterization and mapping of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in Sorghum bicolor. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 95, 66-72.
21. M Tuinstra,G Ejeta,Peter Goldsbrough (1998). Evaluation of Near‐Isogenic Sorghum Lines Contrasting for QTL Markers Associated with Drought Tolerance. Crop Science, 38(3), 835-842.
22. Bhavana Surduse,P Mohanapure,V Khelurkar,M Moharil,A Sapkal,P Jadhav,D Rathod,S Sakhare,A Thorat,R Ghorade (2009). Molecular Characterization of chickpea genotypes and Identification of true hybrids by molecular markers. International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences, 2(1), 41-49.
23. John Williams,Anne Kubelik,Kenneth Livak,J Rafalski,Scott Tingey (1990). DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research, 18(22), 6531-6535.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary. . "Evaluation of Shoot Fly Resistance through SSR Markers in Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - C: Biological Science GJSFR-C Volume 13 (GJSFR Volume 13 Issue C1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 13 Issue C1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

shoot fly sorghum ssr etc

Classification

GJSFR-C Classification FOR Code: 820404

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 11, 2013
Published January 23, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 108

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - C: Biological Science

Authors: Dr. M. K. Choudhary, B. R. Ranwah, V. Saharan (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 199

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5309

Total Downloads (simulated): 378

Publish Date: 2013 01, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 58 views
Month 2: 43 views
Month 3: 33 views
Month 4: 66 views
Month 5: 65 views
Month 6: 39 views
Month 7: 46 views
Month 8: 35 views
Month 9: 36 views
Month 10: 30 views
Month 11: 38 views
Month 12: 42 views
Month 13: 29 views
Month 14: 40 views
Month 15: 34 views
Month 16: 29 views
Month 17: 29 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 45 views
Month 20: 26 views
Month 21: 31 views
Month 22: 38 views
Month 23: 23 views
Month 24: 29 views
Month 25: 35 views
Month 26: 23 views
Month 27: 40 views
Month 28: 39 views
Month 29: 38 views
Month 30: 21 views
Month 31: 21 views
Month 32: 33 views
Month 33: 41 views
Month 34: 29 views
Month 35: 16 views
Month 36: 13 views
Month 37: 12 views
Month 38: 43 views
Month 39: 44 views
Month 40: 11 views
Month 41: 25 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 18 views
Month 44: 20 views
Month 45: 22 views
Month 46: 39 views
Month 47: 42 views
Month 48: 30 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 25 views
Month 51: 44 views
Month 52: 28 views
Month 53: 39 views
Month 54: 20 views
Month 55: 44 views
Month 56: 30 views
Month 57: 36 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 31 views
Month 60: 37 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 40 views
Month 63: 41 views
Month 64: 28 views
Month 65: 20 views
Month 66: 44 views
Month 67: 39 views
Month 68: 48 views
Month 69: 22 views
Month 70: 27 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 20 views
Month 73: 19 views
Month 74: 20 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 34 views
Month 77: 34 views
Month 78: 21 views
Month 79: 46 views
Month 80: 45 views
Month 81: 34 views
Month 82: 32 views
Month 83: 15 views
Month 84: 18 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 28 views
Month 87: 27 views
Month 88: 32 views
Month 89: 18 views
Month 90: 46 views
Month 91: 26 views
Month 92: 24 views
Month 93: 36 views
Month 94: 40 views
Month 95: 42 views
Month 96: 27 views
Month 97: 29 views
Month 98: 45 views
Month 99: 30 views
Month 100: 21 views
Month 101: 22 views
Month 102: 47 views
Month 103: 19 views
Month 104: 19 views
Month 105: 27 views
Month 106: 28 views
Month 107: 31 views
Month 108: 23 views
Month 109: 27 views
Month 110: 14 views
Month 111: 42 views
Month 112: 40 views
Month 113: 28 views
Month 114: 43 views
Month 115: 25 views
Month 116: 19 views
Month 117: 28 views
Month 118: 18 views
Month 119: 46 views
Month 120: 35 views
Month 121: 27 views
Month 122: 48 views
Month 123: 24 views
Month 124: 28 views
Month 125: 35 views
Month 126: 32 views
Month 127: 25 views
Month 128: 27 views
Month 129: 35 views
Month 130: 35 views
Month 131: 23 views
Month 132: 33 views
Month 133: 35 views
Month 134: 24 views
Month 135: 38 views
Month 136: 32 views
Month 137: 33 views
Month 138: 25 views
Month 139: 25 views
Month 140: 28 views
Month 141: 25 views
Month 142: 25 views
Month 143: 35 views
Month 144: 12 views
Month 145: 37 views
Month 146: 19 views
Month 147: 22 views
Month 148: 42 views
Month 149: 34 views
Month 150: 32 views
Month 151: 46 views
Month 152: 40 views
Month 153: 13 views
Month 154: 38 views
Month 155: 33 views
Month 156: 32 views
Month 157: 43 views
Month 158: 29 views
Month 159: 18 views
Month 160: 19 views
Month 161: 29 views
Month 162: 27 views
Month 163: 39 views
Month 164: 36 views
Month 165: 51 views
Month 166: 29 views

Total Views: 5.3K

Total Downloads: 378

All Trends