Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension

Dra. Julieta Fumagalli; Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro; Dra. Virginia Jaichenco

Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension

Dra. Julieta Fumagalli *

Contact

Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro

Contact

Dra. Virginia Jaichenco

Contact

Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

E0UX5

Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

Abstract

Became a fluent reader is one of the aims of the reading learning process. In previous researches, the relationship between oral and silent reading fluency and text reading comprehension has been investigated with different results. According to the variety of information about the topic, the purpose of this work is to compare oral and silent reading fluency to establish possible differences between reading modalities and the implications for reading comprehension. A sample of 171 children from 3rd, 5th, and 7th grade answered three tasks: a standardized word and non-word reading task, an oral reading comprehension task, and a silent reading comprehension task, both designed ad hoc. In order to compare the three groups of students, time measures and accuracy were calculated for word and no-word reading task, and time and comprehension measures were considered for oral and silent reading comprehension tasks.

References

39 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Linnea Ehri (2005). Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings.
Linnea Ehri (2014). Orthographic Mapping in the Acquisition of Sight Word Reading, Spelling Memory, and Vocabulary Learning.
Linnea Ehri,Sandra Mccormick (1998). PHASES OF WORD LEARNING: IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION WITH DELAYED AND DISABLED READERS.
D Elgart (1978). Oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension: A comparative study.
Aintzane Etxebarria,Iñaki Gaminde,Asier Romero,Aitor Iglesias (2016). Desarrollo de la competencia prosódica en la lectura en voz alta: importancia de las pausas.
J Fletcher,P Pumfrey (1988). Differences in Text Comprehension Amongst 7-8-Year-Old Children.
Héctor García-Rodicio,María-Ángeles Melero,María-Belén Izquierdo (2017). A comparison of reading aloud, silent reading and follower reading. Which is best for comprehension? / Una comparación de lectura en voz alta, lectura en silencio y lectura de seguimiento. ¿Cuál es mejor para la comprensión?.
Andrea Hale,Renee Hawkins,Wesley Sheeley,Jennifer Reynolds,Shonna Jenkins,Ara Schmitt,Daniel Martin (2011). An investigation of silent versus aloud reading comprehension of elementary students using Maze assessment procedures.
R Hernandez Sampieri,C Fernandez Collado,P Baptista Lucio (2008). Metodología de la investigación.
R Hudson (2011). Fluency problems: Where and how to intervene.
R Hudson,P Pullen,H Lane,J Torgesen (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view.
R Hudson,J Torgesen,H Lane,S Turner (2012). Relations among reading skills and subskills and text-level reading proficiency in developing readers.
Melanie Kuhn,Paula Schwanenflugel,Elizabeth Meisinger (2010). Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency.
David Laberge,S Samuels (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.
E Leibovich (2012). Dame la palabra 3.
Carmen López-Escribano,María Elosúa De Juan,Isabel Gómez-Veiga,Juan García-Madruga (2013). A predictive study of reading comprehension in third-grade Spanish students.
R Mccallum,Shannon Sharp,Sherry Bell,Thomas George (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency.
J Metsala,L Ehri (2013). Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy.
Justin Miller,Paula Schwanenflugel (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children.
C Martinovich,I Zalduendo,P Cobelli (2013). CLUSTERING OF LAGRANGIAN PARTICLES IN 2D TURBULENCE.
David Paige,Timothy Rasinski,Theresa Magpuri-Lavell,Grant Smith (2014). Interpreting the Relationships Among Prosody, Automaticity, Accuracy, and Silent Reading Comprehension in Secondary Students.
C Perfetti (1985). Reading ability.
Charles Perfetti,Joseph Stafura (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension.
S Prior,K Welling (2001). Read in your head": a vygotskian analysis of the transition from oral to silent reading.
Suzanne Prior,Kimberley Fenwick,Katie Saunders,Rachel Ouellette,Chantell O'quinn,Shannon Harvey (2011). Comprehension After Oral and Silent Reading: Does Grade Level Matter?.
T Rasinski (2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension.
Timothy Rasinski (2006). Reading Fluency Instruction: Moving Beyond Accuracy, Automaticity, and Prosody.
T Rasinski (2010). Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-83-306-1548, Scholastic, Inc., New York, New York..
T Rasinski,D Paige,C Rains,F Stewart,B Julovich,D Prenkert,W Nichols (2017). Effects of Intensive Fluency Instruction on the Reading Proficiency of Third-Grade Struggling Readers.
Timothy Rasinski,Andrew Rikli,Susan Johnston (2009). Reading Fluency: More Than Automaticity? More Than a Concern for the Primary Grades?.
Daiana Stella (2008). Reseña crítica. Formar en práctica reflexiva, Rebecca Anijovich y Graciela Cappelletti (compiladoras). Aique, Buenos Aires, 2023, 176 páginas..
Pablo Wright (2008). Notas etnográficas sobre ser-en-red, proxémica y ontología.
S Samuels (2006). Toward a Model of Reading Fluency.
Labos Edith,Zabala Karina,Trojanowski Sofía,Del Miriam,Bento Ana,Renato Alejandro (1991). AGING AND FUNCTIONAL COMPLEX ACTIVITIES: CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES.
Paula Schwanenflugel,Anne Hamilton,Melanie Kuhn,Joseph Wisenbaker,Steven Stahl (2004). Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers..
C Martinovich,I Zalduendo,P Cobelli (2013). CLUSTERING OF LAGRANGIAN PARTICLES IN 2D TURBULENCE.
Chase Young,Kathleen Mohr,Timothy Rasinski (2015). Reading Together: A Successful Reading Fluency Intervention.
B Zimmerman,T Rasinski (2012). The Fluency Development Lesson: A Model of Authentic and Effective Fluency Instruction.
Jerry Zutell,Timothy Rasinski (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dra. Julieta Fumagalli, Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro, Dra. Virginia Jaichenco. 2019. "Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading Comprehension". Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 19 (GJHSS Volume 19 Issue G9).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 19 Issue G9

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-G Classification FOR Code: 339999

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2019
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 29, 2019

Language

Spanish

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 108

Country: Argentina

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science

Authors: Dra. Julieta Fumagalli, Dr. Juan Pablo Barreyro, Dra. Virginia Jaichenco (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 436

Total Views (Real + Logic): 897

Total Downloads (simulated): 58

Publish Date: 2019 01, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 58 views
Month 2: 26 views
Month 3: 40 views
Month 4: 40 views
Month 5: 48 views
Month 6: 48 views
Month 7: 24 views
Month 8: 33 views
Month 9: 31 views
Month 10: 18 views
Month 11: 39 views
Month 12: 22 views
Month 13: 31 views
Month 14: 18 views
Month 15: 20 views
Month 16: 33 views
Month 17: 10 views
Month 18: 33 views
Month 19: 26 views
Month 20: 18 views
Month 21: 29 views
Month 22: 43 views
Month 23: 19 views
Month 24: 41 views
Month 25: 20 views
Month 26: 35 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 39 views
Month 29: 22 views
Month 30: 39 views
Month 31: 17 views
Month 32: 31 views
Month 33: 33 views
Month 34: 23 views
Month 35: 27 views
Month 36: 31 views
Month 37: 35 views
Month 38: 30 views
Month 39: 28 views
Month 40: 34 views
Month 41: 44 views
Month 42: 29 views
Month 43: 33 views
Month 44: 43 views
Month 45: 11 views
Month 46: 21 views
Month 47: 38 views
Month 48: 22 views
Month 49: 30 views
Month 50: 26 views
Month 51: 43 views
Month 52: 40 views
Month 53: 37 views
Month 54: 23 views
Month 55: 23 views
Month 56: 43 views
Month 57: 25 views
Month 58: 17 views
Month 59: 17 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 21 views
Month 62: 23 views
Month 63: 36 views
Month 64: 25 views
Month 65: 39 views
Month 66: 32 views
Month 67: 34 views
Month 68: 16 views
Month 69: 38 views
Month 70: 28 views
Month 71: 43 views
Month 72: 38 views
Month 73: 20 views
Month 74: 46 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 61 views
Month 77: 62 views
Month 78: 37 views
Month 79: 38 views
Month 80: 21 views
Month 81: 39 views
Month 82: 35 views
Month 83: 20 views
Month 84: 32 views
Month 85: 21 views
Month 86: 27 views
Month 87: 34 views
Month 88: 11 views
Month 89: 33 views
Month 90: 39 views
Month 91: 59 views
Month 92: 43 views
Month 93: 32 views

Total Views: 897

Total Downloads: 58

All Trends