Seismic Evaluation of Multi Storey RC Buildings with and Without Fluid Viscous Dampers

A. Ravitheja

Seismic Evaluation of Multi Storey RC Buildings with and Without Fluid Viscous Dampers

A. Ravitheja * §

Contact

§ M tech structural engineering in G Pulla Reddy Engin...

Seismic Evaluation of Multi Storey RC Buildings with and Without Fluid Viscous Dampers

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

REIL78K

Seismic Evaluation of Multi Storey RC Buildings with and Without Fluid Viscous Dampers Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

Abstract

Earthquakes are one of the most destructive of natural hazards. Earthquake occurs due to sudden transient motion of the ground as a result of release of energy in a matter of few seconds. These recent events remind us of the vulnerability of our society to natural hazards. The protection of civil structures, including material content and human occupants is, without doubt, a worldwide priority. The challenge of structural engineers is to develop safer civil structures to better withstand these natural hazards. In the present study reinforced concrete moment resisting frame building of G+20 are considered. The building is considered to be located in the seismic zone (v) and intended for commercial purpose. Model-I Building without dampers, Model-II -Building with dampers. The building of G+20 has been modeled by providing with and without damper providing all parameters using S A P 2 0 0 0 software. Results show that using fluid viscous dampers to building can effectively reduce the building responses by selecting optimum damping coefficient i.e. when the building is connected to the fluid viscous dampers (FVD) can control both displacements and accelerations of the building. Further damper at appropriate locations can significantly reduce the earthquake response.

References

9 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Constantinou,P Tsopelas,W Hammel,A Sigaher (2001). Toggle-brace-damper seismic energy dissipation systems.
A Şigaher,M Constantinou (2003). Scissor-Jack-Damper energy dissipation system.
K Jinkoo,B Sunghyuk (2002). Optimum distribution of added viscoelastic dampers for mitigation of torsional responses of plan-wise asymmetric structures.
Murat Dicleli,Anshu Mehta (2007). Seismic performance of chevron braced steel frames with and without viscous fluid dampers as a function of ground motion and damper characteristics.
C Lap-Loi,W Lai-Yun,H Hsu-Hui,C Chung-Hsin,L Kuan-Hua (2009). Optimal design theories of tuned mass dampers with nonlinear viscous damping.
C Providakis (2008). Effect of LRB isolators and supplemental viscous dampers on seismic isolated buildings under near-fault excitations.
S Huangsheng,C Linuo (2011). Connecting Parameter Study on Adjacent Structures Linked by Dampers.
V Sadeghi Balkanlou,M Bagerzadeh Karimi,B Azar,Alaeddin Behravesh (2013). A Review of half-car model vibration system using Magneto rheological Dampers.
R Raveesh,T S Sahana (2014). Effect of Tuned Mass Dampers on Multistorey RC Framed Structures.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

A. Ravitheja. 2016. "Seismic Evaluation of Multi Storey RC Buildings with and Without Fluid Viscous Dampers". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 16 (GJRE Volume 16 Issue E1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 16 Issue E1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-E Classification FOR Code: 290801

Submission ReceivedApril 13, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 3, 2016
Published May 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 12, 2016

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering

Authors: A. Ravitheja (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 356

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1108

Total Downloads (simulated): 52

Publish Date: 2016 05, Sun

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 28 views
Month 2: 36 views
Month 3: 22 views
Month 4: 22 views
Month 5: 36 views
Month 6: 30 views
Month 7: 44 views
Month 8: 46 views
Month 9: 29 views
Month 10: 55 views
Month 11: 37 views
Month 12: 46 views
Month 13: 38 views
Month 14: 28 views
Month 15: 45 views
Month 16: 23 views
Month 17: 30 views
Month 18: 31 views
Month 19: 25 views
Month 20: 18 views
Month 21: 20 views
Month 22: 32 views
Month 23: 27 views
Month 24: 18 views
Month 25: 39 views
Month 26: 50 views
Month 27: 34 views
Month 28: 37 views
Month 29: 17 views
Month 30: 41 views
Month 31: 20 views
Month 32: 47 views
Month 33: 29 views
Month 34: 29 views
Month 35: 30 views
Month 36: 23 views
Month 37: 38 views
Month 38: 20 views
Month 39: 30 views
Month 40: 38 views
Month 41: 22 views
Month 42: 38 views
Month 43: 43 views
Month 44: 20 views
Month 45: 33 views
Month 46: 34 views
Month 47: 41 views
Month 48: 24 views
Month 49: 36 views
Month 50: 45 views
Month 51: 26 views
Month 52: 21 views
Month 53: 30 views
Month 54: 32 views
Month 55: 47 views
Month 56: 28 views
Month 57: 33 views
Month 58: 26 views
Month 59: 40 views
Month 60: 26 views
Month 61: 29 views
Month 62: 12 views
Month 63: 24 views
Month 64: 26 views
Month 65: 42 views
Month 66: 31 views
Month 67: 40 views
Month 68: 28 views
Month 69: 40 views
Month 70: 31 views
Month 71: 23 views
Month 72: 40 views
Month 73: 32 views
Month 74: 37 views
Month 75: 23 views
Month 76: 30 views
Month 77: 36 views
Month 78: 20 views
Month 79: 42 views
Month 80: 34 views
Month 81: 29 views
Month 82: 28 views
Month 83: 28 views
Month 84: 26 views
Month 85: 40 views
Month 86: 23 views
Month 87: 27 views
Month 88: 35 views
Month 89: 44 views
Month 90: 42 views
Month 91: 43 views
Month 92: 28 views
Month 93: 27 views
Month 94: 44 views
Month 95: 28 views
Month 96: 33 views
Month 97: 28 views
Month 98: 26 views
Month 99: 27 views
Month 100: 34 views
Month 101: 27 views
Month 102: 40 views
Month 103: 20 views
Month 104: 33 views
Month 105: 33 views
Month 106: 22 views
Month 107: 37 views
Month 108: 25 views
Month 109: 40 views
Month 110: 41 views
Month 111: 28 views
Month 112: 20 views
Month 113: 24 views
Month 114: 18 views
Month 115: 23 views
Month 116: 17 views
Month 117: 25 views
Month 118: 18 views
Month 119: 28 views
Month 120: 70 views
Month 121: 49 views
Month 122: 47 views
Month 123: 55 views
Month 124: 40 views
Month 125: 49 views

Total Views: 1.1K

Total Downloads: 52

All Trends