Reviewer Tools & Resources
At Global Journals®, we aim to support our reviewers with practical tools, clear guidance, and resources to help you carry out reviews effectively and confidently. Below you will find internal utilities, recommended external aids, and best practices to use them well.
Internal Tools & Support
- These are resources we provide to make your review work smoother and more transparent
- Reviewer Guidelines & Checklists
- We supply detailed guidelines and downloadable checklists covering evaluation criteria, ethical checks, structure of reports, and recommended tone.
- Comment Templates & Suggested Phrasing
- To assist you in writing balanced feedback, we offer sample phrasing and templates (for introduction, methods, discussion, etc.) that you may adapt to your style.
- Supplementary Material Requests
- If the submitted manuscript lacks essential data, references, or clarifications, you may request these from the editorial office. We strive to respond promptly to support your assessment.
- Certificates & Acknowledgment
- After completing a review, you can download a certificate of service. Exceptional contributions may be publicly recognized (e.g. in annual reports or on our website).
- Linking Review Activity to Profiles
- You can optionally connect your reviews to your academic profile (e.g. ORCID or similar), so your reviewing contributions become part of your professional record.
- Reviewer Feedback & Analytics
- Editors may share post-review feedback (how your review was used, editorial decisions). Over time, aggregated metrics (review timelines, acceptance/revision recommendations) may be available to you.
External Tools & Resources
- Here are trusted external aids you can use to refine your review practice
- Reviewer Training & Courses
- Access online modules, webinars, or short courses on peer review, writing constructive feedback, handling ethics, and avoiding common pitfalls.
- Checklists & Toolkits
- Use general reviewer toolkits (bias reflection tools, report structure checklists, rubrics) for additional guidance or as a second check.
- Ethics & Best Practice Guidelines
- Consult published standards covering confidentiality, conflicts of interest, and reviewer conduct to ensure your review is ethically sound.
- Reporting Standards & Protocols
- Refer to field-specific reporting guidelines (e.g. for clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews) to verify completeness and transparency of submissions.
- Peer Review Communities & Publications
- Read articles, commentaries, and studies on peer review trends, open peer review models, innovations in reviewing, and ethical discourse.
How to Use These Resources Effectively
- Here are some tips to get the most from these tools
- Start by reading our reviewer guidelines and checklists before opening the manuscript - this sets your frame for evaluation.
- Use comment templates as scaffolding, but don’t rigidly stick to them, always adapt language to the manuscript and context.
- If you need missing data or clarifications, request them early rather than guessing or making assumptions.
- At the end of each review, reflect with a bias-check tool to see if any unconscious bias may have influenced your recommendation.
- After editorial decision, review editor feedback (if given), this helps you refine your reviewing style over time.
- Keep a record of your reviews (dates, journals, topics) and upload them to your academic profile (if you wish).
- Stay current: periodically revisit external resources, guidelines, or training to stay aligned with evolving norms in peer review.
Future Enhancements (Coming Soon)
- We plan to expand our toolkit with these features
- Interactive Review Assistant
- An online tool that helps you check off evaluation points, generate report structure, or spot missing sections.
- Reviewer Recommendation Engine
- Based on your expertise, suggest manuscripts you may be interested in reviewing.
- Mentorship Program
- Pair novice reviewers with experienced reviewers for guidance and feedback.
- Visual Analytics Dashboard
- Reflect on your personal metrics (average review time, accept vs revise recommendations, feedback ratings).