Unraveling Phenomenological Misconceptions and Magnetism

1
Stanislav V. Ordin
Stanislav V. Ordin
2
Stanislav Ordin
Stanislav Ordin
1 Ioffe Institute RAS

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 25 Issue A6

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR7UYH2

Unraveling Phenomenological Misconceptions and Magnetism Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

A phenomenologically correct formulation of the problem is more than half the solution, since the resulting solution provides a rigorous description of the observed effects in the first approximation. Meanwhile, many modern theories describe basic effects using crude multiparameter models with corrections for the Landau smallness parameter. This is most clearly demonstrated in the purely relativistic effect of magnetism, which, it was assumed, is determined by a linear dependence on the charge velocity and, as a result, the description of which contains many phenomenological errors. This led not to an UNDERSTANDING of magnetism, but only to its formal mathematization, carried out in a non-rigorous manner. This led to the mathematical Physicists, without a proper analysis of the classical description of magnetism, “concluded” its quantum nature. Thus, by formally using Euler’s equations without a proper physical analysis, magnetism was incorporated into Maxwell’s equations. The resulting errors in its description were extended into both the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics itself.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Stanislav V. Ordin. 2026. \u201cUnraveling Phenomenological Misconceptions and Magnetism\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 25 (GJSFR Volume 25 Issue A6): .

Download Citation

Article file ID not found.

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Classification
LCC Code: QC760, 537.6, 78A25
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 26, 2026

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 77
Total Downloads: 25
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

A phenomenologically correct formulation of the problem is more than half the solution, since the resulting solution provides a rigorous description of the observed effects in the first approximation. Meanwhile, many modern theories describe basic effects using crude multiparameter models with corrections for the Landau smallness parameter. This is most clearly demonstrated in the purely relativistic effect of magnetism, which, it was assumed, is determined by a linear dependence on the charge velocity and, as a result, the description of which contains many phenomenological errors. This led not to an UNDERSTANDING of magnetism, but only to its formal mathematization, carried out in a non-rigorous manner. This led to the mathematical Physicists, without a proper analysis of the classical description of magnetism, “concluded” its quantum nature. Thus, by formally using Euler’s equations without a proper physical analysis, magnetism was incorporated into Maxwell’s equations. The resulting errors in its description were extended into both the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics itself.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Unraveling Phenomenological Misconceptions and Magnetism

Stanislav Ordin
Stanislav Ordin

Research Journals