Peer Review Policy

Commitment to Quality and Integrity

01

All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review to maintain impartiality and fairness.

02

Reviewers are selected for their subject expertise, independence, and commitment to ethical standards.

03

Manuscripts are evaluated solely on the basis of their academic merit, without discrimination on the grounds of nationality, gender, institutional affiliation, or personal beliefs.

High-tech business presentation on data analysis and research, with professionals discussing insights.

RAAR Report

Referees are asked to evaluate and submit the report from our platform.
Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

 Our Review Process

Initial Screening

  • Manuscripts are first evaluated by our editorial team for scope, originality, and compliance with ethical standards.
  • Papers not meeting submission guidelines or ethical requirements are returned without review.

Final Approval & Publication

  • Once accepted, manuscripts undergo professional editing, formatting, and indexing.
  • Each paper is assigned a DOI for permanent citation and global accessibility.

Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer feedback, editors may recommend

  • Acceptance (with or without minor revisions)
  • Revision (major changes required before reconsideration)
  • Rejection (if the manuscript does not meet quality or  ethical standards)

Double-Blind Peer Review

  • Both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities remain anonymous throughout the process.
  • Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts in the relevant field.
  • Reviews focus on originality, methodology, clarity, ethical compliance, and contribution to the discipline.

Double-Blind Peer Review

  • Authors are given clear guidance and adequate time to address reviewer comments.
  • Revised manuscripts may undergo additional rounds of review if necessary.

Ethical Standards

Global Journals® adheres to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), ensuring

01

Fair and unbiased review decisions.

02

Confidential handling of all submissions.

03

Immediate rejection of plagiarized, falsified, or unethical research.

04

Respect for intellectual property rights and academic integrity.

Reviewer Selection

01

Reviewers are carefully chosen from our global network of experts.

02

Criteria for selection include subject expertise, research experience, and publication record.

03

We value diversity, equity, and inclusion in our reviewer pool, ensuring representation across regions and disciplines.

Peer review process discussion at Global Journals Publishing Group.

Our Promise

Through our peer review policy, Global Journals® ensures that every published article meets the highest levels of academic rigor, ethical integrity, and global impact.

Transparency & Accountability

Authors receive constructive, detailed feedback to improve their work.

Editors ensure reviewers’ comments are professional, respectful, and relevant.

Appeals and disputes are addressed through an independent editorial ethics committee.