A Review of Metrics for Object-Oriented Design

Neyole Misiko
Neyole Misiko
Umma University

Send Message

To: Author

A Review of Metrics for Object-Oriented Design

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE4C660

A Review of Metrics for Object-Oriented Design Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

References

44 Cites in Article
  1. F Abreu (1995). The MOOD Metrics Set.
  2. N Fenton,J Bieman (2014). Software Metrics: ARigorous and Practical Approach, Third Edition.
  3. D Rodriguez,R Harrison (2001). An Overview ofObject-Oriented Design Metrics.
  4. R Harrison,S Counsell,R Nithi (1998). An evaluation of the MOOD set of object-oriented software metrics.
  5. D Glasberg,K Emam,W Melo,Madhavji (2000). Validating Object-Oriented Design Metrics on a Commercial Java Application.
  6. E Berard (1998). Metrics for Object-Oriented Software Engineering.
  7. F Sheikh,R Mohd,H Mohd (2013). A Comparative Study of Software Quality Model.
  8. S Manik,S Gurdev (2011). Analysis of Static and Dynamic Metrics for Productivity and Time Complexity.
  9. H Mahfuzul,A,K (2015). Testability Quantification Framework of Object-Oriented Software: A New Perspective.
  10. H Mahfuzul,A,K (2014). Measuring Testability of Object-Oriented Design: A Systematic Review.
  11. Aymen Kout,Fadel Toure,Mourad Badri (2011). An empirical analysis of a testability model for object-oriented programs.
  12. (2017). ISO/IEC 9126.
  13. M Ruchika,C Anuradha (2014). Application of Group Method of Data Handling model for software maintainability prediction using object-oriented systems.
  14. Scalet (2000). ISO/IEC 9126 and 14598 integration aspects.
  15. N Fenton,M Neil (1999). Software metrics: successes, failures and new directions.
  16. Mukesh Bansal,C Agrawal (2014). Critical Analysis of Object Oriented Metrics in Software Development.
  17. M Aggarwal,V Verma,H Mishra (2013). An Analytical Study of Object-Oriented Metrics (ASurvey).
  18. H Zuse (1991). Software Complexity Measures and Methods.
  19. H Zuse (1996). Foundations of object-oriented software measures.
  20. S Chidamber,C Kemerer (1994). A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design.
  21. Kan Yang,Liz Matson,Michael Choi,David Steinfeld,Brian Ottens,Patrick Coronado,Scott Applebaum (1995). Thermal Design for the New Era of Lunar Instruments: Lessons Learned from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s Instrument Design Laboratory.
  22. B Abreu (1995). Design metrics for OO software system.
  23. V Basili,L Briand,W Melo (1996). Avalidation of object-oriented Metrics as Quality Indicators.
  24. R Sahar,A Hany (2010). Object oriented design metrics and tools a survey.
  25. R Marinescu (2005). Measurement and quality in object-oriented design.
  26. J,-J Jubair,M Khaireddin (2001). metrics for object-oriented design (MOOD) to assess java programs.
  27. F Abreu (1995). Design Quality Metrics for Object-Oriented Software Systems.
  28. Ruchika Malhotra,Megha Khanna (2012). Investigation of relationship between object-oriented metrics and change proneness.
  29. Dharmendra Gupta,Kavita Saxena (2016). Software bug prediction using object-oriented metrics.
  30. Shyam Chidamber,Chris Kemerer (1991). Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design.
  31. S Chidamber,C Kemerer (1994). A metrics suite for object oriented design.
  32. F Abreu,W Melo (1996). Evaluating the Impact of OO Design on Software Quality.
  33. J Mago,P Kaur (2012). Analysis of Quality of the Design of the Object-Oriented Software using Fuzzy Logic.
  34. B Boehm,J Brown,M Lipow (1976). Quantitative Evaluation of Software Quality.
  35. Gonzalo Génova,Juan Llorens,José Fuentes (2004). UML Associations: A Structural and Contextual View..
  36. Zeynab Rashidi (2015). Properties of Relationships Among Objects in Object-Oriented Software Design.
  37. Parul Gandhi,Pradeep Kumar Bhatia (2011). Optimization of ObjectOriented Design using Coupling Metrics.
  38. S Dubey,A Sharma,A Rana (2012). Comparison Study and Review on Object-Oriented Metrics.
  39. A Shaik,B Reddy,M Prakashine,K Deepti (2010). Metrics for object-oriented design software system: A Survey.
  40. Sanjeev Punia,Kuldeep Malik,Harendra Singh (2016). An Analytical Evolution of Usability for Object Oriented Metrics.
  41. T Biggerstaff,C Richter (1987). Reusability Framework, Assessment, and Directions.
  42. V Bidve,A Khare (2012). Simplified Coupling Metrics for Object-Oriented Software.
  43. A Shaik,N Satyanarayana,M Huzaifa,N Shaik,M Naveed,S Rao,C Reddy (2011). Investigate the Result of Object-Oriented Design Software Metrics on Fault-Proneness in Object Oriented Systems: A Case Study.
  44. C Desai (2013). Object Oriented Design Metrics, Frameworks and Quality Models.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Neyole Misiko. 2020. \u201cA Review of Metrics for Object-Oriented Design\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 20 (GJCST Volume 20 Issue C2).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJCST-C Classification D.2.2
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
December 21, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4112
Total Downloads: 1060
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Review of Metrics for Object-Oriented Design

Neyole Misiko
Neyole Misiko <p>Umma University</p>

Research Journals