Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
A9F61
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre
Print ISSN 0975-5861
e-ISSN 2249-4596
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
This paper attempted to assess the attitudes of students in
Advances in technology have created the potential for a new
Inclusion has become a priority on the global educational agenda,
The enactment of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (hereinafter ‘the Act’)is the most significant change that has occurred in Australian property law in the past 27 years. A muchcelebrated milestone, the Act formally recognized traditional Indigenous legal systems and introduced legal pluralism into Australia’s legal system. However, in practice, the native title system remains beset with problems. One of the key issues is native title’s failure to protect Indigenous water rights. ‘Cultural Flows’ is a policy framework conceived of by Indigenous peoples to further advance Indigenous water rights and to include Indigenous voices in water planning and management. This paper proposes the creation of a joint Cultural Flows Commission to assist in implementing Cultural Flows. The paper explores how an intergovernmental agreement could be used to establish the Commission and how the Commission could play a vital role in reforming water law and policy to advance Indigenous selfdetermination in Australia. Most importantly, the Commission would address the many calls for ‘national focus’ when implementing Cultural Flows.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
