Qualitative Analysis of Sustainable Indicators: An Approach to Correlate Sustainable Indicators with Transportation Practices

α
Hariharan Naganathan
Hariharan Naganathan
σ
Oswald Chong
Oswald Chong
ρ
Aaron D Sauer
Aaron D Sauer
Ѡ
Jonghoon Kim
Jonghoon Kim

Send Message

To: Author

Qualitative Analysis of Sustainable Indicators: An Approach to Correlate Sustainable Indicators with Transportation Practices

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

84MS6

Qualitative Analysis of Sustainable Indicators: An Approach to Correlate Sustainable Indicators with Transportation Practices Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Transportation sustainability is centered on being the linchpin to cultivate innovations and enhance safer environmental standards. The public and private agencies adopt sustainable practices integrating their policies in order to elevate sustainability performances. There is an advent need of developing a tool for quantifying the transportation policies and practices. This paper explains (1) the fundamental practices adopted by different transportation agencies; (2) the impacts of three pillars on developing the sustainable indicators; (3) the selection of indicators and their grouping; and (4) the statistical relationship between indicators with the real-time variables population and GDP. This performance benchmark aims to quantify the sustainability practices of the state and its transportation agencies by assessing their environmental, social, and economic practices. The paper examines the relationship between the selected sustainable indicators and establishes the framework for the sustainability of transportation. This framework is a starting point for adding more relevant indicators to measure the sustainability of transportation when data become available.

References

61 Cites in Article
  1. (2009). Sustainable peer exchange.
  2. C Adjo Amekudzi (2005). Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics.
  3. Noreen Mcdonald (2009). Travel and the social environment: Evidence from Alameda County, California.
  4. S Andrea (2013). Overview of Knowledge management.
  5. Apta (2011). Public transportation ridership report.
  6. J Bockisch (2012). http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/IJB-V9No1-p25-33.pdf.
  7. H Bossel (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications.
  8. T Burwell (2006). Issues in sustainable transportation.
  9. Caltrans (2013). California Transportation.
  10. Hill (2009). Unknown Title.
  11. Christopher Moore,Jennifer Shiers,Pamela Mccabe,Jeremy Nix (2013). Teaching Literacy: The Intersection of Social Studies and Language Arts Through Integration.
  12. D Banister,J,-G (2007). Making Sustainable transport politically and publically acceptable.
  13. Daniel (2011). Sustainable Transport Evaluation.
  14. None None (2000). 2024 Annual Merit Review - Vehicle Technologies Office: Results Report.
  15. Dondero (2012). Geology of the bituminous sandstone deposits near Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County, California.
  16. G Dondero (2012). Developing A Comprehensive Sustainable Transportation Analysis Framework.
  17. George Dondero (2012). http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/IJB-V4No1-p158-166.pdf.
  18. Ecmt (2000). Sustainable Transport Policies.
  19. Eia (2010). EIA.
  20. A Eisenman (2012). Sustainable Streets and Highways: An Analysis of Green Roads Rating Systems.
  21. Envision (2013). Envision Sustainable Infrastructure Rating System.
  22. Ziqiang Liu,Bo Xiang,Yunyong He,Bing Li,Haibo Zhou (2007). Application of Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in vulnerability assessment of debris flow control project.
  23. Fhwa (2010). Highway statistics series.
  24. T Flaper (2009). Interesting dermatologic cases from Indiana University Medical Center.
  25. G Gelos,Y Ustyugova (2011). Inflation responses to commodity price shocks -how and why do countries differ? International Monetary Fund Economic Review: Commodity Price Volatility and Inclusive Growth in LICs.
  26. Sebastian Beer,Mark Griffiths,Alexander Klemm (2023). Tax distortions from inflation: What are they? How to deal with them?.
  27. Todd Goldman,Roger Gorham (2006). Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions.
  28. Greenroads (2012). Unknown Title.
  29. Henrik Gudmundssun (2001). Unknown Title.
  30. Hirsch (2011). The Development of Cost-Effective Sustainability Programs and Rating Systems.
  31. Idot (2009). I-LAST.
  32. Idot (2013). IDOT Green initiatives.
  33. Iptv (2004). Fossil fuels.
  34. Jim Warren (2013). SIS Performance.
  35. Kimberly Amadeo (2013). Há Fraude de Execução na Arbitragem?.
  36. U Economy (2013). HARNESSING UN-RETRIEVED WAVE ENERGYSUSTAINABLE APPROACH TOWARDS BLUE ECONOMY: BANGLADESH-PERSPECTIVE.
  37. Langfang (2010). Low‐damage steel structures for enhanced life‐cycle seismic performance.
  38. Valentino Larcinese,Leonzio Rizzo,Cecilia Testa (2004). Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: the Impact of the President.
  39. Lewis (2009). Rail Transport in Greek and Roman World.
  40. Todd Litman,David Burwell (2006). Issues in sustainable transportation.
  41. Todd Litman (2011). Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning.
  42. T Litman (2012). Transportation Impacts on Land Use.
  43. Nmdot (2013). The intelligent transportation system.
  44. Nysdot (2012). Green LITES.
  45. Nysdot (2013). Green and Blue Highways.
  46. Odot (2013). Sustainability Programs.
  47. (2000). OECD Review of Agricultural Policies: Bulgaria 2000.
  48. (2008). Forest health monitoring in Delaware, 1996-1999.
  49. Richard Reed,Anita Bilos,Sara Wilkinson,Karl-Werner Schulte (2009). International Comparison of Sustainable Rating Tools.
  50. F Riche (2010). Key indicators: United States.
  51. J.-P Rodrigue (2013). Transportation and geography.
  52. J Simons (1987). Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
  53. Star (2012). STAR rating systems.
  54. Sunshine Review (2010). The Sunshine State.
  55. Trb (2005). Integrating sustainability into the transportation planning process.
  56. K Turtenwald (2013). Public transport vs Private Transport.
  57. (2013). Texas Basemap - Transportation Map Data.
  58. U Dot (0911). Quantum Dot Synthesis Methods.
  59. (2006). Maritime transport.
  60. (2011). United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD).
  61. Unsda (2012). The International Development Strategy Beyond 2015.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Hariharan Naganathan. 2020. \u201cQualitative Analysis of Sustainable Indicators: An Approach to Correlate Sustainable Indicators with Transportation Practices\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 20 (GJRE Volume 20 Issue E2): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords
Classification
GJRE-E Classification: FOR Code: 290899
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 11, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2400
Total Downloads: 1102
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Transportation sustainability is centered on being the linchpin to cultivate innovations and enhance safer environmental standards. The public and private agencies adopt sustainable practices integrating their policies in order to elevate sustainability performances. There is an advent need of developing a tool for quantifying the transportation policies and practices. This paper explains (1) the fundamental practices adopted by different transportation agencies; (2) the impacts of three pillars on developing the sustainable indicators; (3) the selection of indicators and their grouping; and (4) the statistical relationship between indicators with the real-time variables population and GDP. This performance benchmark aims to quantify the sustainability practices of the state and its transportation agencies by assessing their environmental, social, and economic practices. The paper examines the relationship between the selected sustainable indicators and establishes the framework for the sustainability of transportation. This framework is a starting point for adding more relevant indicators to measure the sustainability of transportation when data become available.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Qualitative Analysis of Sustainable Indicators: An Approach to Correlate Sustainable Indicators with Transportation Practices

Hariharan Naganathan
Hariharan Naganathan Arizona State University
Oswald Chong
Oswald Chong
Aaron D Sauer
Aaron D Sauer
Jonghoon Kim
Jonghoon Kim

Research Journals