Numerical Study on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Boom Mounted  U-Tail of FARIDUAV

Numerical Study on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Boom Mounted U-Tail of FARIDUAV

Emad Hasani Malekshah M.Sc. of Mechanical Engineering

Contact

Mofid Gorji-Bandpy

Contact

Imam Hossein University

Numerical Study on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Boom Mounted U-Tail of FARIDUAV

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

315R2

Numerical Study on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Boom Mounted U-Tail of FARIDUAV Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This study focuses on tail aerodynamic modeling with CFD simulation of an experimental unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in horizontal and vertical section separately. This aircraft with special capabilities has moderate maneuver performance, and predicting the aerodynamic behavior requires knowing that when dynamic stall will occur even in tail. The unsteady nature of the flow field around UAV tail, and the configuration of the generated lift and drag forces must be understood in order to optimize the comfort control system. As a result, flow around the tail and trailing-edge separation of elevator and rudder in horizontal and vertical tail at low Reynolds number with special angle of attack has been simulated .Finally, a custom threecomponent force balance for measuring lift, drag and moment is described in detail. The results indicate that maximum allowable angles of deflection are about 13 and 17 degree in horizontal and vertical tail, respectively. Moreover, each 1degree of deflection decreases almost 0.35 degree horizontal tail stall angle.

References

26 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Dyke Weatherington,Allen Wilson (2005). The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Common Mission Planning Architecture (CMPA)- An Overview.
Avi Abershitz,David Penn,Amit Levy,Aviv Shapira,Zvi Shavit,Shlomo Tsach (2005). IAI's Micro / Mini UAV Systems - Development Approach.
D Kubo,S Suzuki,T Kagami (2006). Development of experimental small UAV equipped with cellular phone data link system.
A Ollero,J Ferruz,F Caballero,S Hurtado,L Merino (2004). Motion compensation and object detection for autonomous helicopter visual navigation in the COMETS system.
J Lejot,C Delacourt,H Piégay,T Fournier,M‐l. Trémélo,P Allemand (2007). Very high spatial resolution imagery for channel bathymetry and topography from an unmanned mapping controlled platform.
Chris Hugenholtz,Ken Whitehead,Owen Brown,Thomas Barchyn,Brian Moorman,Adam Leclair,Kevin Riddell,Tayler Hamilton (2013). Geomorphological mapping with a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS): Feature detection and accuracy assessment of a photogrammetrically-derived digital terrain model.
Chi Yuan,Youmin Zhang,Zhixiang Liu (2015). A survey on technologies for automatic forest fire monitoring, detection, and fighting using unmanned aerial vehicles and remote sensing techniques.
C Cuerno-Rejado,R Martinez-Val (2011). Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the Civil Airworthiness Regulatory System: A Case Study.
J Torres-Sánchez,F López-Granados,J Peña (2015). An automatic object-based method for optimal thresholding in UAV images: Application for vegetation detection in herbaceous crops.
G Salvo,L Caruso,A Scordo (2014). Urban traffic analysis through an UAV.
J Perry,A Mohamed,B Johnson,R Lind (2008). Estimating angle of attack and sideslip under high dynamics on small UAVs.
D Rao,H Tang,T Go (2015). A parametric study of fixed-wing aircraft perching maneuvers.
H Horton (1968). Laminar separation bubbles in two and three dimensional incompressible flow.
Laura Pauley,Parviz Moin,William Reynolds (1990). The structure of two-dimensional separation.
W Phillips,A Hansen,W Nelson (2006). Effects of Tail Dihedral on Static Stability.
M Chandrasekhara,M Wilder (2003). Heat-flux gauge studies of compressible dynamic stall.
J Ekaterinaris,F Menter (1994). Computation of oscillating airfoil flows with one-and two-equation turbulence models.
(1993). Transition effects on compressible dynamic stall of transiently pitching airfoils.
Miguel Visbal (2011). Numerical Investigation of Deep Dynamic Stall of a Plunging Airfoil.
W Mccroskey,L Carr,K Mcalister (1981). Dynamic stall experiments on oscillating airfoils.
Iman Sadeghzadeh,Youmin Zhang (2013). Actuator fault-tolerant control based on Gain-Scheduled PID with application to fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
Gabriel Weymouth,Robert Wilson,Frederick Stern (2005). RANS Computational Fluid Dynamics Predictions of Pitch and Heave Ship Motions in Head Seas.
A Sanchez-Caja,P Rautaheimo,T Siikonen (2000). Simulation of incompressible viscous flow around a ducted propeller using a RANS equation solver.
F Menter (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.
Christopher Rumsey (2010). Compressibility Considerations for k-w Turbulence Models in Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Applications.
Marshall Bern,Paul Plassmann (2000). Mesh Generation.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Emad Hasani Malekshah. 2018. \u201cNumerical Study on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Boom Mounted U-Tail of FARIDUAV\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 17 (GJRE Volume 17 Issue A7).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 17 Issue A7

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-A Classification FOR Code: 290501

Submission ReceivedDecember 14, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2017
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 22, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics

Authors: Emad Hasani Malekshah, Mofid Gorji-Bandpy (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 249

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3335

Total Downloads (simulated): 1641

Publish Date: 2018 01, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 28 views
Month 2: 30 views
Month 3: 51 views
Month 4: 23 views
Month 5: 27 views
Month 6: 23 views
Month 7: 43 views
Month 8: 50 views
Month 9: 19 views
Month 10: 57 views
Month 11: 32 views
Month 12: 14 views
Month 13: 29 views
Month 14: 33 views
Month 15: 42 views
Month 16: 33 views
Month 17: 40 views
Month 18: 35 views
Month 19: 42 views
Month 20: 30 views
Month 21: 30 views
Month 22: 39 views
Month 23: 21 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 30 views
Month 26: 29 views
Month 27: 33 views
Month 28: 18 views
Month 29: 22 views
Month 30: 34 views
Month 31: 35 views
Month 32: 15 views
Month 33: 24 views
Month 34: 29 views
Month 35: 18 views
Month 36: 15 views
Month 37: 20 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 21 views
Month 40: 42 views
Month 41: 23 views
Month 42: 37 views
Month 43: 21 views
Month 44: 35 views
Month 45: 45 views
Month 46: 49 views
Month 47: 35 views
Month 48: 25 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 43 views
Month 52: 20 views
Month 53: 21 views
Month 54: 18 views
Month 55: 22 views
Month 56: 27 views
Month 57: 17 views
Month 58: 30 views
Month 59: 25 views
Month 60: 21 views
Month 61: 28 views
Month 62: 17 views
Month 63: 34 views
Month 64: 39 views
Month 65: 24 views
Month 66: 24 views
Month 67: 29 views
Month 68: 24 views
Month 69: 25 views
Month 70: 46 views
Month 71: 39 views
Month 72: 23 views
Month 73: 36 views
Month 74: 38 views
Month 75: 44 views
Month 76: 48 views
Month 77: 17 views
Month 78: 35 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 18 views
Month 81: 33 views
Month 82: 26 views
Month 83: 38 views
Month 84: 18 views
Month 85: 30 views
Month 86: 36 views
Month 87: 38 views
Month 88: 19 views
Month 89: 35 views
Month 90: 34 views
Month 91: 42 views
Month 92: 39 views
Month 93: 37 views
Month 94: 34 views
Month 95: 25 views
Month 96: 40 views
Month 97: 25 views
Month 98: 59 views
Month 99: 58 views
Month 100: 41 views

Total Views: 3335

Total Downloads: 1641

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]