Cultural Differences, Strengths, Weaknesses and Challenges of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) – A Comparison between and United Kingdom (UK) Malaysia

Md. Mahmudur Rahman
Md. Mahmudur Rahman

Send Message

To: Author

Cultural Differences, Strengths, Weaknesses and Challenges of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) – A Comparison between and United Kingdom (UK) Malaysia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

J1JIY

Cultural Differences, Strengths, Weaknesses and Challenges of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) – A Comparison between and United Kingdom (UK) Malaysia Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

References

21 Cites in Article
  1. Terrence Witkowski,Yulong Ma,Dan Zheng (2003). Cross‐cultural influences on brand identity impressions: KFC in China and the United States.
  2. Anon (2019). Unknown Title.
  3. Merry Weaver (a.N.D How to show appreciation at work.
  4. Anon (2019). Unknown Title.
  5. (2010). Soundboard.
  6. Sungwoo Hwang (2010). <div> 카르마 프랙탈 인과론(KFC)관점 AI의 윤리 (<span>AI Ethics based on Karma Fractal Causality (KFC))</span> <br> </div>.
  7. Muhammad Bin Zain Asman,Daisy Kee,Gonge Yun,Huang Xun,Tulika Thakur,Dheeraj Mehta (2010). Business Idea For KFC Malaysia: A Study of Potential Business Idea For KFC Holdings (Malaysia) Berhad.
  8. B William,Gudykunst (2003). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication.
  9. M Agarwal,G Mirsa (1993). Socio-cultural values and relative deprivation in work organizations.
  10. J Black,M Mendenhall (1990). Xross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research.
  11. Oliver Breiden,Hafiz Mirza,Alexander Mohr (2004). Coping with the Job Abroad : A Correspondence Model of Expatriate Work Adjustment.
  12. R French (2007). Cross-Cultural Management in Work Organisations.
  13. Frederick Herzberg (1968). One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?.
  14. G Hofstede (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values.
  15. G Hofstede (1991). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind.
  16. G Hofstede (1984). Culture Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, abridged edn.
  17. Camille Schuster,Michael Copeland (2008). Cultural theory in use: the intersection of structure, process and communication in business practice.
  18. P Senge (1997). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation.
  19. Trompenaars (1993). Riding the waves of culture.
  20. Howard Tu,Sherry Sullivan (1994). Preparing yourself for an international assignment.
  21. Kenneth Keith (2009). Dimensions of Culture (Geert H. Hofstede) – Masculinity.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Md. Mahmudur Rahman. 2019. \u201cCultural Differences, Strengths, Weaknesses and Challenges of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) – A Comparison between and United Kingdom (UK) Malaysia\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - E: Marketing GJMBR-E Volume 19 (GJMBR Volume 19 Issue E1).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-E Classification JEL Code: M36
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
February 14, 2019

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2906
Total Downloads: 1446
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Cultural Differences, Strengths, Weaknesses and Challenges of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) – A Comparison between and United Kingdom (UK) Malaysia

Md. Mahmudur Rahman
Md. Mahmudur Rahman

Research Journals