The Flipping of Traditional Economic Thinking: Contrasting the Working of Dwarf Green Market Thinking with That of Green Market Thinking to Highlight Main Differences and Implications

The Flipping of Traditional Economic Thinking: Contrasting the Working of Dwarf Green Market Thinking with That of Green Market Thinking to Highlight Main Differences and Implications

Lucio Munoz

Contact

The Flipping of Traditional Economic Thinking: Contrasting the Working of Dwarf Green Market Thinking with That of Green Market Thinking to Highlight Main Differences and Implications

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

B718Z

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

From the time of Adam Smith(1776) to 2012 UNCSD Rio +20 conference we have lived in a world where government intervention in markets was not welcomed, except in very specific circumstances such as market failures, a feeling at the heart of free-market thinking. From 2012 to now June 2019, we have slowly moved to a world where permanent government intervention is not just welcomed, but also encouraged such as when governments directly intervene in markets to deal with environmental issues. This is indeed a move away from free-market thinking, and towards non-free market thinking as it represents a shift from green market solutions to dwarf green market solutions. In other words, the promotion and implementation of dwarf green market thinking like carbon pricing really require a departure from traditional economic thinking, a practice that is now accepted by today’s economists. And this raises questions such as: Has traditional economic thinking been flipped in practice when dealing with the environmental issue? If yes, what are the implications of this in terms of consumption and production in dwarf green markets? How are dwarf green markets then be expected to work?

References

10 Cites in Article

Reference Format

(2017). Pembina Institute comments on Technical Paper on the Federal Carbon Pricing Backstop.
(2018). Why Canada should move forward with carbon pollution pricing - More than ever, the world needs Canada to lead.
Lucio Muñoz (2016). SUSTAINABILITY THOUGHTS 151: AN OVERVIEW OF MARKET VARIABILITY BASED ON DOMINANT COMPONENT EQUALITY AND FREEDOM: WHAT IS THE STRUCTURE OF A TRUE PERFECT MARKET?.
Lucio Muñoz (2017). Is Environmental Externality Management a Correction of Adam Smith's Model to Make it Environmentally Friendly and Shift it Towards Green Markets or is it a Distortion on Top of Another Distortion?.
Lucio Muñoz (2019). Market Power in Electricity Markets.
Adam Smith (1776). Adam Smith: The Wealth of Nations Year: 1776.
(2012). International Law & World Order: Weston's & Carlson's Basic Documents V.B.31 RIO+20 DECLARATION ON THE FUTURE WE WANT. Adopted by the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, 22 June 2012. Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), UN Doc A/CONF.216/16 at 1 (2012)..
(2012). International Law & World Order: Weston's & Carlson's Basic Documents V.B.31 RIO+20 DECLARATION ON THE FUTURE WE WANT. Adopted by the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, 22 June 2012. Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), UN Doc A/CONF.216/16 at 1 (2012)..
(2012). Inclusive Green Growth.
(1987). World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED).

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Lucio Munoz. 2019. \u201cThe Flipping of Traditional Economic Thinking: Contrasting the Working of Dwarf Green Market Thinking with That of Green Market Thinking to Highlight Main Differences and Implications\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - E: Marketing GJMBR-E Volume 19 (GJMBR Volume 19 Issue E4).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 19 Issue E4

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-E Classification JEL Code: M30

Submission ReceivedDecember 12, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2019
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 17, 2019

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2793

Total Downloads: 1324

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]