Meta-Analytical Validity of the Social Entrepreneurship Inventory: A Study of Random Effect Sizes

Meta-Analytical Validity of the Social Entrepreneurship Inventory: A Study of Random Effect Sizes

Gilberto Bermudez-Ruiz

Contact

Rigoberto Sanchez-Rosales

Contact

Francisco Espinoza-Morales

Contact

Enrique Martinez-Munoz

Contact

Arturo Sanchez-Sanchez

Contact

Cruz Garcia-Lirios

Contact

Meta-Analytical Validity of the Social Entrepreneurship Inventory: A Study of Random Effect Sizes

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

8PAG8

Meta-Analytical Validity of the Social Entrepreneurship Inventory: A Study of Random Effect Sizes Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The meta-analytic validity understood as the evidence of homogeneity demonstrated through parameters that measure the normal distribution, sum of total effects and proportions of differences between the studies consulted was the objective of the present work. A metaanalytical study was conducted with a selection of sources indexed to international repositories, considering the publication period from 2015 to 2019. The meta-analytical threshold of predictive confidence was established, although the research design limited the findings of heterogeneity to the study sample, suggesting the extension of the work towards indexed sources and publications prior to that observed.

References

39 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Guadalupe Morales-Martinez,Ricardo Villarreal-Lozano,Maria Hedlefs-Aguilar (2016). Thinking Styles Underlying the Cognitive Judgements of Exam Anxiety amongst University Students of Engineering.
W Aldana (2018). Specification of a model for the study of the public security agenda.
W Aldana (2019). Especificación de un modelo para el estudio de la identidad migratoria.
F Anguiano (2018). Nanotech Security Corp. Completes Upsized $3.9 Million Financing.
A Blanes (2018). Exploratory category structure of civil mobilization in the contruction of security agenda.
J Bustos (2018). Mexico will stall, not stop Central American migrants.
J Bustos (2019). Discussion of a theoretical review alluding to sustainable behavior and the governance of common goods.
J Carreón (2013). Theories of lower-class criminality.
Adriana Ornelas,Cristina Ortega,María Brain,Mahelet Zamora,María Pérez,Patricia Duque,Martha Acosta,Luisa Ramírez (2016). What is the perspective of future social work professionals training? A comparative approach between México and Colombia.
J Carreón (2018). Networks of violence regarding the gpovernance of public security.
M Castillo (2015). Empirical test a model of quality of life.
M Delgado (2018). Specification of a model for the study of consensual migration.
C García (2015). The sociopolitical legitimacy of the administration of public security in Xilitla, San Luis Potosi (Mexico).
C Garcia (2018). Coffee entrepreneurship among migrants of the Huazteca region central Mexico.
Cruz García-Lirios (2019). Dimensions of human development theory.
J Hernández (2014). Local and Intra-Destination Public Transport.
J Hernández (2016). Public security governance base on ideas on identity and risk perception that haves been established by the media within the citizens agenda.
M Juárez (2017). Specification a model for the study of local governance.
M Juárez (2019). Specification of a model for the study of intercultural migration.
G Limón (2018). Exploratory factors structural of the habitus mobility.
E Martínez (2019). Governance of quality of life and wellbeing subjective.
J Mecalco (2014). Complex political systems: Implications for sustainable public security.
S Mejía (2016). Psychological effects of violence and insecurity in ederly.
D Mendoza (2017). Reading Simón Bolívar's Delirium: Messianism and its Publics.
M Morales (2013). Public transport.
M Morales (2014). Local and Intra-Destination Public Transport.
A Quezada (2017). Governance of public security in the building sociopolitical identity.
A Quezada (2018). Reliability and validity of a instrument that measures the perception of the reliability penitentiary governance.
M Quintero (2015). Reliability and validity of an instrument measured subjective governance.
R Rincón (2018). Interpretation of Meaning Across Discourses.
B Rivera (2015). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument.
F Rosas (2015). Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures perceptions of corruption.
R Salinas (2015). Specification for a communication model of environmental risk to climate change.
A Sánchez (2018). Nanotech Security Corp. Completes Upsized $3.9 Million Financing.
F Sandoval (2016). Approach to the frame of the print media regarding the attentio n the victims of case Ayotzinapa. Iguala-Gerrero (Mexico).
F Sandoval (2018). Chapter 8 – Carbon Dioxide Emissions Policies and Actions of Low-Carbon Development in China’s Transport Sector.
O Valdés (2019). Specification of a model for the study of the of the stablishment of multip le water sustainability agendas.
F Vilchis (2016). Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures seven dimensions of security perceptions in students from a public university.
E Villegas (2018). Social Works towards a quality of life and wellbeing subjective.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

. 2019. \u201cMeta-Analytical Validity of the Social Entrepreneurship Inventory: A Study of Random Effect Sizes\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 19 (GJMBR Volume 19 Issue A10).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 19 Issue A10

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: L26

Submission ReceivedDecember 16, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2019
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 21, 2019

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 106

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management

Authors: Gilberto Bermudez-Ruiz, Rigoberto Sanchez-Rosales, Francisco Espinoza-Morales, Enrique Martinez-Munoz, Arturo Sanchez-Sanchez, Cruz Garcia-Lirios (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 208

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2691

Total Downloads (simulated): 1249

Publish Date: 2019 09, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 43 views
Month 2: 56 views
Month 3: 39 views
Month 4: 27 views
Month 5: 52 views
Month 6: 48 views
Month 7: 38 views
Month 8: 34 views
Month 9: 35 views
Month 10: 33 views
Month 11: 48 views
Month 12: 45 views
Month 13: 39 views
Month 14: 35 views
Month 15: 44 views
Month 16: 22 views
Month 17: 26 views
Month 18: 31 views
Month 19: 25 views
Month 20: 27 views
Month 21: 36 views
Month 22: 23 views
Month 23: 10 views
Month 24: 28 views
Month 25: 16 views
Month 26: 19 views
Month 27: 21 views
Month 28: 18 views
Month 29: 11 views
Month 30: 25 views
Month 31: 38 views
Month 32: 33 views
Month 33: 23 views
Month 34: 40 views
Month 35: 31 views
Month 36: 32 views
Month 37: 23 views
Month 38: 24 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 23 views
Month 41: 39 views
Month 42: 49 views
Month 43: 35 views
Month 44: 25 views
Month 45: 29 views
Month 46: 27 views
Month 47: 46 views
Month 48: 17 views
Month 49: 24 views
Month 50: 24 views
Month 51: 30 views
Month 52: 37 views
Month 53: 36 views
Month 54: 43 views
Month 55: 27 views
Month 56: 23 views
Month 57: 30 views
Month 58: 15 views
Month 59: 17 views
Month 60: 40 views
Month 61: 41 views
Month 62: 43 views
Month 63: 29 views
Month 64: 47 views
Month 65: 43 views
Month 66: 16 views
Month 67: 32 views
Month 68: 19 views
Month 69: 21 views
Month 70: 25 views
Month 71: 42 views
Month 72: 14 views
Month 73: 33 views
Month 74: 37 views
Month 75: 25 views
Month 76: 29 views
Month 77: 70 views
Month 78: 45 views
Month 79: 49 views
Month 80: 21 views

Total Views: 2691

Total Downloads: 1249

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]