On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study

α
Mncedisi Michael Willie
Mncedisi Michael Willie

Send Message

To: Author

On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

KQIUU

On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

References

22 Cites in Article
  1. (2001). CBS News/New York Times Monthly Poll, March 2001.
  2. R Adler (2011). Performance management and organisational strategy: How to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms.
  3. M Armstrong,A Baron (1998). Performance management: the new realities.
  4. M Armstrong (2010). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human-resource Management Practice (11th ed.).
  5. Armstrong Baron,A (1998). Out of the Tick Box.
  6. M Bhengu,M Bussin (2009). The perceived effectiveness of employee share options as a mechanism of talent management in South Africa.
  7. Shannon Burger (2006). An Alternative Method to Forced Distribution as a Means of Evaluating Employee Performance.
  8. V Chau (2008). The Relationship of Strategic Performance Management to team strategy, company performance and organisational effectiveness.
  9. R Desimone,J Werner,D Harris (2002). Human Resource Development (3rd ed.).
  10. C Harbring,J Berger,D Sliwka (2010). Performance Appraisals and the Impact of Forced Distribution: An Experimental Investigation.
  11. E Lawler,G Benson,M Mc Dermatt (2012). Performance Management and Reward System.
  12. F Lenenburg (2012). Performance Appraisal: Methods and Rating Errors.
  13. B Mujtaba,S Shuaib (2010). <i>Current Procedural Terminology</i> Category II Codes.
  14. A O'callaghan (2005). Performance Management: SDFs in the Fasset Sector.
  15. A Sarkar,A Mukhopadhyay,S Ghosh (2011). Comparison of Performance Appraisal Score: A Modified Methodology.
  16. S Saxena (2010). Performance Management System.
  17. Shah (2012). The Impact of HR Dimensions on Organisational Performance.
  18. Susan Stewart,Melissa Gruys,Maria Storm (2010). Forced distribution performance evaluation systems: Advantages, disadvantages and keys to implementation.
  19. M Svaranja (2010). Integrated Performance Management Systems.
  20. M Willie (2014). Analysis of performance reward models: A Multinum Investments case study.
  21. Zewotirt (2012). On employees' performance appraisal: the impact and treatment of the rater's effect.
  22. Y Zhang (2004). The impact of performance management system on the employee: Analysis with WERS.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mncedisi Michael Willie. 2018. \u201cOn Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A1): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A1
Pg. 15- 22
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: H89
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 25, 2018

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3275
Total Downloads: 1589
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

On Normalisation Performance Scores Models: An Illustrative Case Study

Mncedisi Michael Willie
Mncedisi Michael Willie

Research Journals