Exploring the Relationship between Conflict Management Style and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study in the Organizations of Bangladesh

α
Kamol Gomes
Kamol Gomes
σ
Md. Abu Taher
Md. Abu Taher
α Notre Dame University Bangladesh

Send Message

To: Author

Exploring the Relationship between Conflict Management Style and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study in the Organizations of Bangladesh

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9T18X

Exploring the Relationship between Conflict Management Style and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study in the Organizations of Bangladesh Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Conflict originally meant to strike at another, to fight with an enemy or to battle against an opposing force. Today, it also means to be antagonistic towards others or to be in sharp disagreement with others. Within organizations conflicts are inevitable, and arise in case of disagreements over workloads, problems in communication, individual differences in needs, wants, goals, values, opinions, preferences or behavior. It can be intense, and it is usually unpleasant. The issues can be cultural, social, political or economic in nature. They can be at individual, community, national or international level. The main goal of this study is to examine the relationships between conflict management and organizational performance (OP). One potential clarification for the conflicting findings is that earlier studies did not investigate the factors that may have a positive effect on the relationships between Conflict Management Style (CMS) and Organizational Performance (OP). To analyze the conflict management from a wider perspective, the present study model includes four antecedents’ factors (management facilitation, creativity and innovation, decent environment and intrinsic rewards) which are hypothesized to lead to the practices of CMS and OP as a dependent factor.

References

66 Cites in Article
  1. Zaid Al-Hamdan,Peter Norrie,Denis Anthony (2010). Conflict management styles used by nurses in Jordan.
  2. Overton Armstrong (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys.
  3. Bagshaw (1411). What should be the management policy for asymptomatic inguinal hernias.
  4. P Bentler,Chih-Ping Chou (1987). Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.
  5. Berrett-Koehler (2009). Intrinsic Motivation at Work: What Really Drives Employee Engagement.
  6. (2009). Unknown Title.
  7. Barlett (1950). Test of Significance in Factor Analysis Baron & Kenny.
  8. R Blake,Mouton (1984). Solving costly Organizational Conflict.
  9. Cavusgil Calantone,Zhao (2002). The moderating effects of innovativeness on new product development ability.
  10. Huang Chan,Man Ng (2008). Managers' conflict management styles and employee attitudinal outcomes: the mediating role of trust.
  11. G Chen,C Liu,D Tjosvold (2005). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China.
  12. Conbere (2001). Theory building for conflict management system design.
  13. & Cosier,Schwenk (1990). Effects of Consensus and Devill's Advocacy on Strategic Decision-Making.
  14. John Darling,Christine Fogliasso (1999). Conflict management across cultural boundaries: a case analysis from a multinational bank.
  15. John Darling,W Earl Walker (2001). Effective conflict management: use of the behavioral style model.
  16. David Banner (1995). Conflict resolution: a recontextualization.
  17. Kurt Dirks,Donald Ferrin (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice..
  18. Carsten De Dreu,Annelies Van Vianen (1997). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams.
  19. & Falk,Miller (1992). Knowledge Management.
  20. Field (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS.
  21. Raymond Friedman,Simon Tidd,Steven Currall,James Tsai (2000). WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND: THE IMPACT OF PERSONAL CONFLICT STYLE ON WORK CONFLICT AND STRESS.
  22. Gerami (2009). Bridging the theory-and-practice gap: Mediator power in practice.
  23. Govindarajan Gupta (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations.
  24. Anderson Hair,Tatham,Black (2005). Exploratory Factor Analysis.
  25. Henry (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance.
  26. David Hsu,Rosemarie Ziedonis (2007). Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial‐firm patents.
  27. Jackson (2003). Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications.
  28. Jarrett (2009). The Future of Mediation: A Sociological Perspective.
  29. Mannix Jehn (2001). The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance.
  30. ' Jehn (1995). The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intra-group Conflict and Group Performance.
  31. Sanz- Jimenez,Valle (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture.
  32. Khandwalla (1977). The design of organizations.
  33. Kline (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity, and Purchase Intention: A Dual-Process Model.
  34. Harrington Lambert (1990). Advances in Business Marketing & Purchasing.
  35. Tiosvold Leung,Hui,Yu (1998). Cultural dimensions in the cognition of negotiation style, effectiveness and trust development: the case of Australian and Hong Kong Chinese executives.
  36. Liebowitz (1999). Key ingredients to the success of an organization's knowledge management strategy.
  37. Fred Luthans,Carolyn Youssef (2006). Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior.
  38. Mcshulskis (1996). Managing Employee Conflicts.
  39. Susan Messman,Rebecca Mikesell (2000). Competition and interpersonal conflict in dating relationships.
  40. Klaus Meyer (2004). Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies.
  41. Miller (1988). The Modigliani-Miller Propositions after Thirty Years.
  42. Mintzberg (1975). From Management Development to Organization Development with Impact OD Practitioner, connecting development to the workplace.
  43. & Nabatchi,Bingham (2007). Organizational Justice & Dispute Resolution: A. Six-Factor Model for Workplace Mediation.
  44. Harikesh Nair (2007). Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games.
  45. Gunby Nelson (2010). Innovation adoption decisions: The effect of problem solving styles and social support.
  46. & Pal,Bagi (1987). Factor analysis of user satisfaction: a special reference to the library, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
  47. E Phillips,R Cheston (1979). Conflict Resolution: What works?.
  48. Philip Podsakoff,Scott Mackenzie,Jeong-Yeon Lee,Nathan Podsakoff (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies..
  49. Podsakoff (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.
  50. Rubia Pruitt (1986). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement.
  51. Poole Putnam (1987). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update.
  52. M Rahim,N Magner,D Shapiro (2000). Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors? What justice perceptions, precisely?.
  53. M Rahim,N Magner,D Rahman,S (2001). Do Justice Relationships with Organizationdirected Reactions Differ across U.S. and Bangladesh Employees.
  54. Rhoades (1999). The Behavioral Context of Strategic Choice in Negotiation: A Test of Dual Concern Model1.
  55. Sander (2009). Interpersonal Conflict Management Styles and Emotion Self-Management Competencies of Public Accountants.
  56. L Song,L Chang,E Park (2000). Conflict management between employees from different departments: contribution of organizational identification and controversy.
  57. Xie Song,Jinhong Xie,Barbara Dyer (2000). Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Managers’ Conflict-Handling Behaviors.
  58. A Stimec,J Poitras (2009). Building Trust with Parties: Are Mediators Overdoing it.
  59. Kilmann Thomas (1974). Conflict and Conflict Management.
  60. Tymon Thomas (1994). Intrinsic rewards and work engagement in the South African retail industry.
  61. Thomas (1976). Conflict and conflict management Practice (100-102.
  62. David Thomas (1997). Factors affecting successful reintegration.
  63. Thompson (2004). The facets of the entrepreneur: identifying entrepreneurial potential.
  64. Dean Tjosvold,Alfred Wong,Nancy Chen,Wendong Li (2010). Theory of Cooperation and Competition in Chinese Societies: Accomplishments and Challenges.
  65. Chin Wong,Pang Hiew (2005). Correlations between factors affecting the diffusion of mobile entertainment in Malaysia.
  66. Bell Wood (2008). Predicting interpersonal.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kamol Gomes. 2018. \u201cExploring the Relationship between Conflict Management Style and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study in the Organizations of Bangladesh\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A4): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A4
Pg. 37- 52
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: M10
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 3, 2018

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3327
Total Downloads: 1576
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Conflict originally meant to strike at another, to fight with an enemy or to battle against an opposing force. Today, it also means to be antagonistic towards others or to be in sharp disagreement with others. Within organizations conflicts are inevitable, and arise in case of disagreements over workloads, problems in communication, individual differences in needs, wants, goals, values, opinions, preferences or behavior. It can be intense, and it is usually unpleasant. The issues can be cultural, social, political or economic in nature. They can be at individual, community, national or international level. The main goal of this study is to examine the relationships between conflict management and organizational performance (OP). One potential clarification for the conflicting findings is that earlier studies did not investigate the factors that may have a positive effect on the relationships between Conflict Management Style (CMS) and Organizational Performance (OP). To analyze the conflict management from a wider perspective, the present study model includes four antecedents’ factors (management facilitation, creativity and innovation, decent environment and intrinsic rewards) which are hypothesized to lead to the practices of CMS and OP as a dependent factor.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Exploring the Relationship between Conflict Management Style and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study in the Organizations of Bangladesh

Md. Abu Taher
Md. Abu Taher
Kamol Gomes
Kamol Gomes

Research Journals