Epigenetic Factors of Biological Variability and Individual Sensitivity to Biotic Stresses

α
Kravets A., Sokolova D.
Kravets A., Sokolova D.
σ
Kravets A.
Kravets A.
ρ
Sokolova D.
Sokolova D.
α National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Send Message

To: Author

Epigenetic Factors of Biological Variability and Individual Sensitivity to Biotic Stresses

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

5ROKL

Epigenetic Factors of Biological Variability and Individual Sensitivity to Biotic Stresses Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The variability of a wide variety of characteristics, including sensitivity to biotic and abiotic environmental factors, is one of the fundamental properties of living things. This study is a continuation of the investigation of the effect of epigenetic differences on the individual resistance of plants to abiotic and biotic stresses. The aim was to investigate the connection between epigenetic polymorphism of two wheat varieties and different sensitivity to fungal infection. Diverse DNA methylation patterns of seed subpopulations with various germination times used as a marker of epigenetic polymorphism. Showed that fast-grown seed subpopulation (Podolyanka variety) which characterized with a higher level of intravariety epigenetic polymorphism, had slow development and lowered final level of fungal infection compared to slow-grown seed subpopulation. The effect observed in plants of this variety for crops of different years. Favoritka variety was characterized with a lower level of intravariety epigenetic polymorphism and shown unstable results in fungal infection of both fast-and slow-grown seed subpopulations. The data obtained indicate the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in determining the individual sensitivity of plants to phytopatogens and the role of epigenetic polymorphism as a factor contributing to the biological diversity of crops.

References

25 Cites in Article
  1. M Begon,C Townsend,J Harper (2006). Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems.
  2. Flavio Breseghello,Alexandre Coelho (2013). Traditional and Modern Plant Breeding Methods with Examples in Rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.).
  3. Sukumar Chakraborty (2013). Migrate or evolve: options for plant pathogens under climate change.
  4. Cheng Cheng,Xiquan Gao,Baomin Feng,Jen Sheen,Libo Shan,Ping He (2013). Plant immune response to pathogens differs with changing temperatures.
  5. Charles Darwin (1876). The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom.
  6. Peter Dodds,John Rathjen (2010). Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions.
  7. J Doughari (2015). An Overview of Plant Immunity.
  8. L Granke,M Hausbeck (2010). Effects of Temperature, Humidity, and Wounding on Development of Phytophthora Rot of Cucumber Fruit.
  9. Jian Hua (2013). Modulation of plant immunity by light, circadian rhythm, and temperature.
  10. P Juroszek,A Von Tiedemann (2011). Potential sttimegies and future requirements for plant disease management under a changing climate.
  11. J Jones,J Dangl (2006). The plant immune system.
  12. Fumiaki Katagiri,Kenichi Tsuda (2010). Understanding the Plant Immune System.
  13. E Koshkin (2010). Tret'yakov, N.N., Koshkin, E.I., Novikov, N.N., Makrushin, N.M., Pil'shchikova, N.V., Karnaukhova, T.V., and Loseva, A.S., Fiziologiya i biokhimiya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh rastenii (Physiology and Biochemistry of Crop Plants), Moscow: Kolos, 1998.
  14. O Kravets,D Sokolova,A Berestyana,O Shnurenko,M Bannikova,B Morgun,M Kuchuk,D Grodzinsky (2016). Correlation between Ecological Plasticity of Elite Winter Wheat Varieties and DNA Methylation Pattern Polymorphism within Variety.
  15. A Kravets,D Sokolova (2018). Evaluation of Factors Indicating Epigenetic Polymorphism through Population of Maize Seedlings.
  16. Ajjamada Kushalappa,Kalenahalli Yogendra,Shailesh Karre (2016). Plant Innate Immune Response: Qualitative and Quantitative Resistance.
  17. R Neil,G Miller,G Sergio (2017). Plant immunity: unraveling the complexity of plant responses to biotic stresses.
  18. Jonathan Powell,Jason Carere,Timothy Fitzgerald,Jiri Stiller,Lorenzo Covarelli,Qian Xu,Frank Gubler,Michelle Colgrave,Donald Gardiner,John Manners,Robert Henry,Kemal Kazan (2017). The Fusarium crown rot pathogen<i>Fusarium pseudograminearum</i>triggers a suite of transcriptional and metabolic changes in bread wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>L.).
  19. Serge Savary,Andrea Ficke,Jean-Noël Aubertot,Clayton Hollier (2012). Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security.
  20. D Sokolova,G Vengzhen,A Kravets (2014). Effect of epigenetic polymorphism of corn seeds on their germination rate and resistance of seedlings under UV-C exposure.
  21. André Velásquez,Christian Castroverde,Sheng He (2018). Plant–Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions.
  22. E Veselov (1955). Darwinism: a textbook for student.
  23. Tim Wheeler,Joachim Von Braun (2013). Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security.
  24. Yi Wang,Zhilong Bao,Ying Zhu,Jian Hua (2009). Analysis of Temperature Modulation of Plant Defense Against Biotrophic Microbes.
  25. Y Zhang,X Liu (2010). Does Epigenetic Polymorphism Contribute to Phenotypic Variances in Jatropha curcas L.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kravets A., Sokolova D.. 2020. \u201cEpigenetic Factors of Biological Variability and Individual Sensitivity to Biotic Stresses\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - C: Biological Science GJSFR-C Volume 20 (GJSFR Volume 20 Issue C1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-C Classification: FOR Code: 069999
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 11, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2453
Total Downloads: 1171
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The variability of a wide variety of characteristics, including sensitivity to biotic and abiotic environmental factors, is one of the fundamental properties of living things. This study is a continuation of the investigation of the effect of epigenetic differences on the individual resistance of plants to abiotic and biotic stresses. The aim was to investigate the connection between epigenetic polymorphism of two wheat varieties and different sensitivity to fungal infection. Diverse DNA methylation patterns of seed subpopulations with various germination times used as a marker of epigenetic polymorphism. Showed that fast-grown seed subpopulation (Podolyanka variety) which characterized with a higher level of intravariety epigenetic polymorphism, had slow development and lowered final level of fungal infection compared to slow-grown seed subpopulation. The effect observed in plants of this variety for crops of different years. Favoritka variety was characterized with a lower level of intravariety epigenetic polymorphism and shown unstable results in fungal infection of both fast-and slow-grown seed subpopulations. The data obtained indicate the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in determining the individual sensitivity of plants to phytopatogens and the role of epigenetic polymorphism as a factor contributing to the biological diversity of crops.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Epigenetic Factors of Biological Variability and Individual Sensitivity to Biotic Stresses

Kravets A.
Kravets A.
Sokolova D.
Sokolova D.

Research Journals