Sensorial Profile and Acceptability of Coffee Blends Submitted to Different Roasting Degrees

Ana Paula Lelis Rodrigues de Oliveira
Ana Paula Lelis Rodrigues de Oliveira
Ramon Felipe Neves
Ramon Felipe Neves
Gabriel Henrique Horta de Oliveira
Gabriel Henrique Horta de Oliveira
Magno Vinicius Corrêa de Souza
Magno Vinicius Corrêa de Souza

Send Message

To: Author

Sensorial Profile and Acceptability of Coffee Blends Submitted to Different Roasting Degrees

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

YGLV6

Sensorial Profile and Acceptability of Coffee Blends Submitted to Different Roasting Degrees Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

Industry of roasted and ground coffee uses Coffea arabica L. (arabica) and Coffeacanephora(robusta), main coffee species, to form blends consumed worldwide. In addition to blends composition, industries also vary the roast degree to attend the consumer market. Being that stated, this work aimed to evaluate the influence of roasting degree and blends composition, using sensorial analysis, over the product acceptability. Arabica and robusta coffee were dehulled, classified, and roasted at Agtrons numbers SCAA#65 (medium-light) e SCAA#45 (moderately dark). Afterward, the authors made a preliminary test to select the blends for conventional consumers as a function of robusta coffee percentage. After the selection and determination of adequate proportion (0, 30, and 60 % m/m) of robusta coffee, the researchers invited 49 consumers to perform the tests. The researchers used preliminary tests to indicate that 29 out of the 49 consumers are capable to complete the tests. They performed the sensorial analysis of the blends, signaling grades from 1 to 9 to flavor, aroma, and appearance. Blend composition presented a higher impact over the coffee acceptability than the roast degree, in which coffee with 0% of robusta coffee, independently of the roast degree, followed by sample with 30% of robusta coffee roasted at medium light, presented the highest grades.

References

18 Cites in Article
  1. André Almeida (2017). A Política de Garantia de Preços Mínimos - PGPM e a atuação da Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB no período após a abertura comercial: mudança institucional e novos instrumentos.
  2. Bing Cheng,Agnelo Furtado,Heather Smyth,Robert Henry (2016). Influence of genotype and environment on coffee quality.
  3. R Paterson,Nelson Lima,Marta Taniwaki (2014). Coffee, mycotoxins and climate change.
  4. A Illy,R Viani (1996). Quality.
  5. J Ribeiro Unknown Title.
  6. C Caten (2014). Unknown Title.
  7. Deborah Pacetti,Emanuele Boselli,Michele Balzano,Natale Frega (2012). Authentication of Italian Espresso coffee blends through the GC peak ratio between kahweol and 16-O-methylcafestol.
  8. Ikram Boublenza,Hamadi Lazouni,Leila Ghaffari,Karine Ruiz,Anne-Sylvie Fabiano-Tixier,Farid Chemat (2017). Influence of Roasting on Sensory, Antioxidant, Aromas, and Physicochemical Properties of Carob Pod Powder (<i>Ceratonia siliqua</i>L.).
  9. Su-Yeon Kim,Null- Ko,Bo-Sik Kang,Hyun-Jin Park (2018). Prediction of key aroma development in coffees roasted to different degrees by colorimetric sensor array.
  10. Isabel López-Galilea,M De Peña,Concepción Cid (2007). Correlation of Selected Constituents with the Total Antioxidant Capacity of Coffee Beverages: Influence of the Brewing Procedure.
  11. G Vargas-Elias (2011). Avaliação das propriedades físicas e qualidade do café em diferentes condições de torrefação.
  12. Ana De Oliveira,Paulo Corrêa,Efraim Reis,Gabriel De Oliveira (2015). Comparative Study of the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Coffee and Sensorial Analysis by Principal Components.
  13. Elizabeth Larmond,A Petrasovits,Edwin Moran (1977). Eating Quality of Large White Turkeys as Influenced by Age and Sex11Contribution No 162 Food Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada..
  14. P Corrêa,G Oliveira,A Oliveira,G Vargas-Elías,F Santos,F Baptestini (2016). Preservation of roasted and ground coffee during storage Part 1: Moisture content and repose angle.
  15. Maitê Silva,Hesmael Castro,Múcio Farnezi,Nísia Pinto,Enilson Silva (2009). Caracterização química e sensorial de cafés da chapada de minas, visando determinar a qualidade final do café de alguns municípios produtores.
  16. Fabiana Jordão (2005). Perfil sensorial e aceitabilidade de suco de laranja integral pasteurizado e suco de laranja reconstituido.
  17. M Passos,L S; Pereira,D Carvalho,C Caten (2015). Avaliação de diferentes tipos de cafés, com consumidores não treinados a partir do projeto de experimentos: doe -design ofexperiments.
  18. Marlene Monteiro,Valéria Minim,Aline Silva,José Chaves (2010). Influência da torra sobre a aceitação da bebida café.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ana Paula Lelis Rodrigues de Oliveira. 2020. \u201cSensorial Profile and Acceptability of Coffee Blends Submitted to Different Roasting Degrees\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - I: Interdisciplinary GJSFR-I Volume 20 (GJSFR Volume 20 Issue I3).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-I Classification FOR Code: 070399
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
August 11, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2551
Total Downloads: 1162
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Sensorial Profile and Acceptability of Coffee Blends Submitted to Different Roasting Degrees

Ana Paula Lelis Rodrigues de Oliveira
Ana Paula Lelis Rodrigues de Oliveira
Ramon Felipe Neves
Ramon Felipe Neves
Gabriel Henrique Horta de Oliveira
Gabriel Henrique Horta de Oliveira
Magno Vinicius Corrêa de Souza
Magno Vinicius Corrêa de Souza

Research Journals