A Comparitive Study on the Electrode Kinetics and Mechanism of Pesticides Having Different Electro Active Centres at Carbon Nano Tubes Paste Electrode

Article ID

W7Q2R

A Comparitive Study on the Electrode Kinetics and Mechanism of Pesticides Having Different Electro Active Centres at Carbon Nano Tubes Paste Electrode

T. Raveendranath Babu
T. Raveendranath Babu
P. Sujana
P. Sujana
S. Rajasekhar Reddy
S. Rajasekhar Reddy
DOI

Abstract

In this approach electrode kinetics and mechanism of pesticides having different electro active centres at carbon nano tubes paste electrode was studied. Universal buffer used as supporting electrolyte and the techniques employed are cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetry, millicoulometry and controlled potential electrolysis. All investigations were made from pure samples dissolved in di methyl formamide. Peak currents were linear over the concentration range of 10-7 M to 10-12 M with lower detection limits of 1.02x 10-11 M. The relative standard deviation and correlation coefficients for phenothrin, chlorpropham and fenclorim are found to be are found to be 1.30%, 0.998, 1.25%, 0.996 and1.26%, 0.997respectively for 10 replicates.

A Comparitive Study on the Electrode Kinetics and Mechanism of Pesticides Having Different Electro Active Centres at Carbon Nano Tubes Paste Electrode

In this approach electrode kinetics and mechanism of pesticides having different electro active centres at carbon nano tubes paste electrode was studied. Universal buffer used as supporting electrolyte and the techniques employed are cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse adsorptive stripping voltammetry, millicoulometry and controlled potential electrolysis. All investigations were made from pure samples dissolved in di methyl formamide. Peak currents were linear over the concentration range of 10-7 M to 10-12 M with lower detection limits of 1.02x 10-11 M. The relative standard deviation and correlation coefficients for phenothrin, chlorpropham and fenclorim are found to be are found to be 1.30%, 0.998, 1.25%, 0.996 and1.26%, 0.997respectively for 10 replicates.

T. Raveendranath Babu
T. Raveendranath Babu
P. Sujana
P. Sujana
S. Rajasekhar Reddy
S. Rajasekhar Reddy

No Figures found in article.

K. Sivasankar. 2016. “. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research – B: Chemistry GJSFR-B Volume 16 (GJSFR Volume 16 Issue B3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 16 Issue B3
Pg. 41- 45
Classification
GJSFR-B Classification: FOR Code: 250603
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 3724
Total Downloads: 1807
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Comparitive Study on the Electrode Kinetics and Mechanism of Pesticides Having Different Electro Active Centres at Carbon Nano Tubes Paste Electrode

T. Raveendranath Babu
T. Raveendranath Babu
P. Sujana
P. Sujana
S. Rajasekhar Reddy
S. Rajasekhar Reddy

Research Journals