Mozingo Studies II. Similarity of the Planktonic and Deposited Diatom Assemblages

Article ID

P2OUP

Mozingo Studies II. Similarity of the Planktonic and Deposited Diatom Assemblages

Kurt A. Haberyan
Kurt A. Haberyan Northwest Missouri State University
DOI

Abstract

In paleolimnology, downcore assemblages are taken to be representative of the plankton that were living at some moment in the past. To evaluate the fidelity of the deposited diatom assemblage to that of the living plankton, a twentyyear series of whole-water plankton samples was compared to surface-sediment diatoms. When standardized and pooled, the 81 quarterly plankton samples were composed of Aulacoseira (51%), Cyclostephanos and other discoid diatoms (28%), Asterionella (9%), and Fragilaria (8%). In the deposited assemblage, however, the rank of the two most-common taxa was reversed: Cyclostephanos+ outnumbered Aulacoseira (47 and 34%, respectively). Some littoral taxa were overrepresented in sediments (e.g. Encyonema) while others were under-represented (e.g. Gyrosigma). The reasons for these differences appear unrelated to frustule dissolution, but may insteadrelate to sampling frequency, sampling depth, and lake-specific characteristics.

Mozingo Studies II. Similarity of the Planktonic and Deposited Diatom Assemblages

In paleolimnology, downcore assemblages are taken to be representative of the plankton that were living at some moment in the past. To evaluate the fidelity of the deposited diatom assemblage to that of the living plankton, a twentyyear series of whole-water plankton samples was compared to surface-sediment diatoms. When standardized and pooled, the 81 quarterly plankton samples were composed of Aulacoseira (51%), Cyclostephanos and other discoid diatoms (28%), Asterionella (9%), and Fragilaria (8%). In the deposited assemblage, however, the rank of the two most-common taxa was reversed: Cyclostephanos+ outnumbered Aulacoseira (47 and 34%, respectively). Some littoral taxa were overrepresented in sediments (e.g. Encyonema) while others were under-represented (e.g. Gyrosigma). The reasons for these differences appear unrelated to frustule dissolution, but may insteadrelate to sampling frequency, sampling depth, and lake-specific characteristics.

Kurt A. Haberyan
Kurt A. Haberyan Northwest Missouri State University

No Figures found in article.

Kurt A. Haberyan. 2017. “. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research – I: Interdisciplinary GJSFR-I Volume 16 (GJSFR Volume 16 Issue I3): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 16 Issue I3
Pg. 37- 41
Classification
GJSFR-I Classification: FOR Code: 040599
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 3479
Total Downloads: 1666
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Mozingo Studies II. Similarity of the Planktonic and Deposited Diatom Assemblages

Kurt A. Haberyan
Kurt A. Haberyan Northwest Missouri State University

Research Journals