Brazilian Patient Organizations and Regenerative Medicine: Selective Comparisons with the Experience of the United Kingdom

Article ID

8O17B

Brazilian Patient Organizations and Regenerative Medicine: Selective Comparisons with the Experience of the United Kingdom

Liliana Acero
Liliana Acero
DOI

Abstract

Patient organizations have become a privileged locus to mediate relations in health care between state and society. This study analyses the roles played in regenerative medicine by Brazilian disease-specific and rare disease patient organizations and draws comparisons with those of the United Kingdom. International public engagement, citizen science, and patient-centered medicine policies are briefly discussed as well as the organizing models of patient associations, the relations of ‘biosociality’, and the construction of alternative‘civicepistemologies’ or tacit forms of knowing. Qualitative analysis is based on documentary information on the sector, secondary data from the organizations’ websites and 18 online interviews with representatives of Brazilian patient organizations. These data show that diseasespecific organizations mainly support patients and contribute to their treatments – an auxiliary operational model – and train members to become informed interlocutors – an emancipatory model. By contrast, most rare disease associations tend to form partnerships with researchers to reformulate treatments and impact public policy.

Brazilian Patient Organizations and Regenerative Medicine: Selective Comparisons with the Experience of the United Kingdom

Patient organizations have become a privileged locus to mediate relations in health care between state and society. This study analyses the roles played in regenerative medicine by Brazilian disease-specific and rare disease patient organizations and draws comparisons with those of the United Kingdom. International public engagement, citizen science, and patient-centered medicine policies are briefly discussed as well as the organizing models of patient associations, the relations of ‘biosociality’, and the construction of alternative‘civicepistemologies’ or tacit forms of knowing. Qualitative analysis is based on documentary information on the sector, secondary data from the organizations’ websites and 18 online interviews with representatives of Brazilian patient organizations. These data show that diseasespecific organizations mainly support patients and contribute to their treatments – an auxiliary operational model – and train members to become informed interlocutors – an emancipatory model. By contrast, most rare disease associations tend to form partnerships with researchers to reformulate treatments and impact public policy.

Liliana Acero
Liliana Acero

No Figures found in article.

Liliana Acero. 2021. “. Global Journal of Medical Research – K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 21 (GJMR Volume 21 Issue K4): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Classification
GJMR-K Classification: NLMC Code: QU 450
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 1879
Total Downloads: 886
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Brazilian Patient Organizations and Regenerative Medicine: Selective Comparisons with the Experience of the United Kingdom

Liliana Acero
Liliana Acero

Research Journals