Viscosity Measurement Results of a Commercially Available Universal Design Food (UDF: can be crushed with the Longue) using the line Spread Test (LST) – Comparison after adding Eight different Types of Thickeners to Shrimp Gratin
In Japan, which is a super-aged society, people need the nursing care foods in recent years. For the prevention of aspiration pneumonia, there is a demand for safe and delicious nursing care food for not only patients but also senior citizen. To create food for swallowing that can be easily prepared even at ordinary homes, among the previous studies that have already been reported, using a type of universal design food, but that can be crushed with the tongue, for which the results have not yet been shown, is suitable or not for nursing care food is not sure. To obtain the viscosity, we investigated using eight types of thickeners and reported them. After adding 1 g, 2 g, and 3 g of each of the eight types of thickeners to commercially available shrimp gratin, a line spread test (LST) was performed using a superficial thickness measuring plate (manufactured by Saraya Co., Ltd.). As a result, by adding 1 g, it was possible to obtain a thick viscosity of 30 mm or more and less than 32 mm, which is thought to promote safe swallowing.
## I. INTRODUCTION
As of October 1, 2021, the total population of Japan was 125.5 million (announcement by the Statistics Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications). The population aged 65 and over is 36.21 million (15.72 million men, 20.49 million women), accounting for $28.9\%$ of the total population. Among the population aged 65 and over, the population aged 65-74 is 17.54 million (8.39 million men, 9.15 million women), accounting for $14.0\%$ of the total population. The population aged 75 and over is 18.67 million (7.33 million males and 11.34 million females), accounting for $14.9\%$ of the total population, which exceeds those aged 65-74. It is speculated that the need for nursing care food will increase in Japan, which will become an increasingly aged society in the future. To prevent aspiration pneumonia, it is necessary to provide safe and delicious nursing care food[1,2]. In a previous study, Shyoko Kondo[3,4] and Mayumi Hirabayashi[5,6] reported the results of a line spread test on a commercially available universal design hood (UDF) that does not require chewing, can be crushed with the gums, and can be chewed quickly. However, there are no reports yet regarding crushing with the tongue. Therefore, in this study, among the commercially available universal design foods (UDF) that are available in general households, foods labeled as being crushable with the tongue were treated with a simple thickening board (manufactured by Saraya Co., Ltd.) with eight types of thickeners. The purpose was to measure the viscosity after addition and to indicate the amount of thickener to be added to obtain a concentration that can be safely swallowed.
## II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Shrimp gratin, which is a universal design food (UDF) available on the market, was labeled as being crushable with the tongue. Is the nutritional value of shrimp gratin labeled as crushable with the tongue shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Nutritional value of commercial UDF (cruch with tongue)
<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Product name</td><td rowspan="2">Energy (kcal)</td><td rowspan="2">Protein (g)</td><td rowspan="2">Fat (g)</td><td colspan="2">Carbohydrates (g)</td><td rowspan="2">sodium (mg)</td><td rowspan="2">Calcium (g)</td></tr><tr><td>Sugar (g)</td><td>Dietary fiber (g)</td></tr><tr><td>Shrimp gratin</td><td>76</td><td>1.6</td><td>5</td><td>5.8</td><td>0.6</td><td>0.5</td><td>131</td></tr></table>
Furthermore, after adding 1 g, 2 g, and 3 g of each of the eight commercially available thickeners (A-H) to the shrimp gratin, the viscosity after 30 seconds and 5 minutes was measured using a superficial thickness measuring plate (manufactured by Saraya Co., Ltd.). Line spread test (LST) was performed using. The ingredients of the eight types of thickeners are listed, and the nutritional elements are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 Content and nutritional value of eight types of thickeners
<table><tr><td rowspan="3" colspan="2">Contents</td><td colspan="10">Nutrient contents (per 100g)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">Energy (kcal)</td><td rowspan="2">Protein (g)</td><td rowspan="2">Fat (g)</td><td colspan="2">Carbohydrates (g)</td><td rowspan="2">sodium (mg)</td><td rowspan="2">Potassium (g)</td><td rowspan="2">Calcium (g)</td><td rowspan="2">Phosphorus (g)</td><td rowspan="2">Iron (g)</td></tr><tr><td>Sugar (g)</td><td>Dietary fiber (g)</td></tr><tr><td>A</td><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide thickener, Starch</td><td>226</td><td>1.2</td><td>0.2</td><td>64.4</td><td>25.1</td><td>188~405</td><td>10~20</td><td>868</td><td>18.5</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>B</td><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide thickener</td><td>292</td><td>0.5</td><td>0</td><td>60.5</td><td>23.4</td><td>1550</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>C</td><td>Dextriin, Xanthan gum, Calcium lactate, Trisodium citrate</td><td>346</td><td>0.5</td><td>0</td><td></td><td>86</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2">D</td><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide thickener, CMC</td><td>390</td><td>0.8</td><td>0</td><td>54.9</td><td>34.3</td><td>1850</td><td>144</td><td>7.4</td><td>71</td><td>0.47</td></tr><tr><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>E</td><td>thickener, Potassium chloride, Sucralose</td><td>263</td><td></td><td>0~1.0</td><td>64.3</td><td>23.5</td><td>540</td><td>870</td><td>13</td><td>72</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>F</td><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide thickener, Potassium chloride</td><td>240</td><td></td><td>0</td><td>54</td><td>35</td><td>1180</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>G</td><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide thickener, Sodium chloride</td><td>260</td><td>0.7</td><td>0</td><td>46</td><td>37</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>H</td><td>Dextriin, Polysaccharide thickener, Emulsifier</td><td>288</td><td>7.3</td><td>0.4~1.7</td><td>54</td><td>33</td><td>1773</td><td>107~288</td><td></td><td>85</td><td></td></tr></table>
### a) Sample (food with Thickener added) adjustment
Samples were adjusted according to previous reports $^{3,4,5,6}$. Each of the three foods was prepared as follows.
1) The thickness of the food product was measured without any change (homogenized with a mixer) after 30 seconds, 5minutes.
2) The thickness of the food product was measured with change (homogenized with a mixer) after 30 seconds, 5minutes.
3) The thickness was measured on the food product with modification (homogenized with a mixer) after adding 1gramof Thickener (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H) to the food (100g) after 30seconds, 5minutes.
4) The thickness was measured on the food product with modification (homogenized with a mixer) after adding 2 grams of Thickener (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H) to the food (100g) after 30seconds, 5minutes.
5) The thickness was measured on the food product with modification (homogenized with a mixer) after adding 3 grams of Thickener (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H) to the food (100g) after 30seconds, 5minutes.
### b) Viscosity measurement method
Using the Line Spread Test Start Kit (LST) manufactured by SARAYA, the viscosity of each food was measured. The measurement procedure is as follows. The line spread test (LST) was performed in a room with a room temperature of 24 degrees. Thickness measurements by line spread test (LST) were performed three times using the same sample. Data was obtained by averaging the viscosity results of three repeated measurements. The measurement method was according to Line Spread Test Start Kit (LST) manufactured by SARAYA.
1. Place the sheet on a level surface. Place a ring with an inner diameter of $30\mathrm{mm}$ in the center of the concentric circles.
2. Add the liquid to be measured to the total thickness of thering (20ml) and let stand for 30 seconds.
3. Lift the ring vertically, and after 30 seconds, measure the spread distance of the solution<sup>7)</sup>. Six points on the outermost circumference of the sample spread concentrically were measured, and the average value was calculated as the result of LST values.
4. After standing for 5 minutes, the spread of the samples is measured again at 6 points, and the average value is recorded as the LST value.
### c) Criteria for viscosity
There are three levels of classification by LST value<sup>8)</sup>. The first stage is mildly thick with a viscosity that falls within the 43mm to 36mm (50-150 mPa · s). As for the properties, when the spoon is tilted, it flows down quickly<sup>4)</sup>. The second stage is moderately thick with a viscosity that falls within the 36mm to 32mm (150-300 mPa · s). As for the properties, when you tilt the spoon, it flows to the surface<sup>4)</sup>. The third stage is highly thick with a viscosity that falls within the 32mm to 30mm (300-500 mPa · s). Even if the spoon is tilted, the shape is maintained to some extent, and does not flow easily<sup>8)</sup>.
### d) Statistical processing
This study was statistically processed using statistical processing software (Excel 2010: SSRI Co., Ltd). The data to be compared were first tested for normal distribution by F-test. For comparisons between correlated data, the paired Student-t test was used for normally distributed data. Wilcoxon test was used for non-normally distributed data[7].
gratin and the eight types of commercially available LST values. It was found that after homogenizing the sample using a mixer, the mixture food became thin, increasing the risk of aspiration when swallowing. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the viscosity of the mixture food with a commercially available thickener. Addition of $1\mathrm{g}$ of all eight types of thickeners resulted in thicker LST values after 30 seconds. However, after 5 minutes, it became intermediate thickness in thickener C. With the addition of $2\mathrm{g}$ and $3\mathrm{g}$, the value for all thickeners was $30\mathrm{mm}$ or less, and the thickness was thicker than thicker. In this study, the appropriate value was set to $23 - 32\mathrm{mm}$ (previous research; according to Mayumi Hirabayashi), so it is possible to obtain the proper value by adding $1\mathrm{g}$ of thickeners A and G and $1\mathrm{g}$ or $2\mathrm{g}$ of thickener B,C,D,E,F, and H have understood. When $1\mathrm{g}$ was added and after standing for 30 seconds, the viscosity increased in the order of Thickeners D, G, and A. When $2\mathrm{g}$ was added and after standing for 30 seconds, the density increased in the order of Thickeners G, A, and H. Thickeners E, H, and G had high density when $3\mathrm{g}$ was added and after standing for 30 seconds.
## III. RESULTS
Table 3-1 shows the LST value results of the commercially available UDF (tongue crushable) shrimp Table 3 Viscosity measurement results of eight types of thickeners for Shrimp gratin
<table><tr><td colspan="2"></td><td colspan="3">After 30 seconds</td><td colspan="3">After 5 minutes</td><td colspan="3">After 30 seconds</td><td colspan="3">After 5 minutes</td><td colspan="3">After 30 seconds</td><td colspan="3">After 5 minutes</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Non mizer processing (NMP)</td><td>19.6</td><td>±</td><td>1.4</td><td>21.8</td><td>±</td><td>2.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Mixer processin (MP)</td><td>39.8</td><td>±</td><td>2.1</td><td>43.6</td><td>±</td><td>2.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">MP with Thickener A</td><td>24.6</td><td>±</td><td>1.8</td><td>26.6</td><td>±</td><td>1.8</td><td>21.7</td><td>±</td><td>5.7</td><td>22.4</td><td>±</td><td>6</td><td>21.6</td><td>±</td><td>4.5</td><td>21.8</td><td>±</td><td>4.7</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">MP with Thickener B</td><td>26.9</td><td>±</td><td>5.3</td><td>28.5</td><td>±</td><td>5.2</td><td>23.8</td><td>±</td><td>3.8</td><td>24.7</td><td>±</td><td>3.8</td><td>22</td><td>±</td><td>4.8</td><td>22.3</td><td>±</td><td>5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">MP with Thickener C</td><td>30.5</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>32.3</td><td>±</td><td>2</td><td>25.1</td><td>±</td><td>3.8</td><td>26</td><td>±</td><td>3.9</td><td>21.7</td><td>±</td><td>4</td><td>22.1</td><td>±</td><td>4.3</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>MP with Thickener D</td><td>Add</td><td>24.3</td><td>±</td><td>4.2</td><td>25.8</td><td>±</td><td>4.5</td><td>23.6</td><td>±</td><td>2.6</td><td>24.3</td><td>±</td><td>2.8</td><td>Add</td><td>21.7</td><td>±</td><td>4.9</td><td>22.3</td><td>±</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>MP with Thickener E</td><td>1g</td><td>25.6</td><td>±</td><td>3</td><td>27.3</td><td>±</td><td>3</td><td>23.4</td><td>±</td><td>1.9</td><td>24.1</td><td>±</td><td>2.2</td><td>3g</td><td>19.9</td><td>±</td><td>2.2</td><td>20.5</td><td>±</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">MP with Thickener F</td><td>30.3</td><td>±</td><td>1.7</td><td>31.9</td><td>±</td><td>1.6</td><td>26.4</td><td>±</td><td>2.4</td><td>28.2</td><td>±</td><td>3.4</td><td>21.7</td><td>±</td><td>1.2</td><td>22.2</td><td>±</td><td>1.5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">MP with Thickener G</td><td>24.5</td><td>±</td><td>3</td><td>25.8</td><td>±</td><td>3.4</td><td>21.4</td><td>±</td><td>3.3</td><td>22.1</td><td>±</td><td>3.8</td><td>21.5</td><td>±</td><td>2.1</td><td>21.3</td><td>±</td><td>2.2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">MP with Thickener H</td><td>25.6</td><td>±</td><td>1.9</td><td>27.3</td><td>±</td><td>1.8</td><td>22.5</td><td>±</td><td>6.7</td><td>23.3</td><td>±</td><td>7.2</td><td>20.6</td><td>±</td><td>3.3</td><td>21.6</td><td>±</td><td>4.3</td><td></td></tr></table>
Table 3-2 shows the results of multiple comparisons of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $1\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners and after 30 seconds of LST standing according to the Scheffé method. Thickener A and Thickeners C and F, Thickener
C and Thickeners D, E, G and H, Thickener D and Thickener F, Thickener E and Thickener F, thickener A statistically significant difference was shown between agent F and Thickeners G and H.
Table 3-3 Multiple comparison (upper probability) of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding 2g of 8 types of thickeners by Scheffe's method (after standing still for 30 seconds)
<table><tr><td></td><td>Thickener A</td><td>Thickener B</td><td>Thickener C</td><td>Thickener D</td><td>Thickener E</td><td>Thickener F</td><td>Thickener G</td><td>Thickener H</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener A</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9679</td><td>0.6211</td><td>0.9880</td><td>0.9940</td><td>0.1198</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener B</td><td>0.9679</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9995</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.8813</td><td>0.9294</td><td>0.9990</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener C</td><td>0.6211</td><td>0.9995</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9973</td><td>0.9940</td><td>0.9986</td><td>0.4977</td><td>0.8949</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener D</td><td>0.9880</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9973</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.7980</td><td>0.9679</td><td>0.9998</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener E</td><td>0.9940</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9940</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.7368</td><td>0.9817</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener F</td><td>0.1198</td><td>0.8813</td><td>0.9986</td><td>0.7980</td><td>0.7368</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0734</td><td>0.3556</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener G</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9294</td><td>0.4977</td><td>0.9679</td><td>0.9817</td><td>0.0734</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9998</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener H</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9990</td><td>0.8949</td><td>0.9998</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.3556</td><td>0.9998</td><td>-----</td></tr></table>
Table 3-2 Multiple comparison (upper probability) of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding
$1\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners by Scheffe's method (after standing still for 30 seconds)
<table><tr><td></td><td>Thickener A</td><td>Thickener B</td><td>Thickener C</td><td>Thickener D</td><td>Thickener E</td><td>Thickener F</td><td>Thickener G</td><td>Thickener H</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener A</td><td>-----</td><td>0.7789</td><td>0.0001</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9992</td><td>0.0002</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9992</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener B</td><td>0.7789</td><td>-----</td><td>0.1315</td><td>0.6064</td><td>0.9945</td><td>0.2040</td><td>0.7101</td><td>0.9945</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener C</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.1315</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0000</td><td>0.0037</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0000</td><td>0.0037</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener D</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.6064</td><td>0.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9926</td><td>0.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9926</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener E</td><td>0.9992</td><td>0.9945</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.9926</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0077</td><td>0.9977</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener F</td><td>0.0002</td><td>0.2040</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0000</td><td>0.0077</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.0077</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener G</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.7101</td><td>0.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9977</td><td>0.0001</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9977</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener H</td><td>0.9992</td><td>0.9945</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.9926</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0077</td><td>0.9977</td><td>-----</td></tr></table>
Table 3-3 shows the results of multiple comparisons of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring, after $2\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners were added, and after 30 seconds of LST standing according to the Scheffé method. There was no significant difference between all groups.
Table 3-4 shows the results of multiple comparisons of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $3\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners according to the Scheffe method and after 30 seconds of LST standing. There was no significant difference between all groups.
Table 3-4 Multiple comparison (upper probability) of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $3\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners by Scheffe's method (after atanding still for 30 seconds)
<table><tr><td></td><td>Thickener A</td><td>Thickener B</td><td>Thickener C</td><td>Thickener D</td><td>Thickener E</td><td>Thickener F</td><td>Thickener G</td><td>Thickener H</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener A</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9864</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9998</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener B</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9341</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9953</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener C</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9736</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9991</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener D</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9736</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9991</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener E</td><td>0.9864</td><td>0.9341</td><td>0.9736</td><td>0.9736</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9786</td><td>0.9894</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener F</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9786</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9994</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener G</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9894</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9998</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener H</td><td>0.9998</td><td>0.9953</td><td>0.9991</td><td>0.9991</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9994</td><td>0.9998</td><td>-----</td></tr></table>
Table 3-5 shows the results of multiple comparisons of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $1\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners and after 5 minutes of LST standing according to the Scheffé method. Thickener A and Thickeners C and F, Thickener
C and Thickeners D, E, G, H, Thickener D and Thickener F, Thickener E and Thickener F, thickener A statistically significant difference was shown between agent F and Thickeners G and H and Thickener G.
Table 3-5 Multiple comparison (upper probability) of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $1\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners by Scheffe's method (after atanding still for 5 minutes)
<table><tr><td></td><td>Thickener A</td><td>Thickener B</td><td>Thickener C</td><td>Thickener D</td><td>Thickener E</td><td>Thickener F</td><td>Thickener G</td><td>Thickener H</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener A</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9246</td><td>0.0004</td><td>0.9999</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0013</td><td>0.9999</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener B</td><td>0.9246</td><td>-----</td><td>0.1260</td><td>0.6002</td><td>0.9971</td><td>0.2350</td><td>0.6002</td><td>0.9971</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener C</td><td>0.0004</td><td>0.1260</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0000</td><td>0.0049</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0000</td><td>0.0049</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener D</td><td>0.9999</td><td>0.6002</td><td>0.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9865</td><td>0.0001</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9865</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener E</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9971</td><td>0.0049</td><td>0.9865</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0137</td><td>0.9865</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener F</td><td>0.0013</td><td>0.2350</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.0137</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0001</td><td>0.0137</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener G</td><td>0.9999</td><td>0.6002</td><td>0.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9865</td><td>0.0001</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9865</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener H</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9971</td><td>0.0049</td><td>0.9865</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.0137</td><td>0.9865</td><td>-----</td></tr></table>
Table 3-6 shows the results of multiple comparisons of LST after 5 minutes of stirring after adding 2 g of 8 types of thickeners according to the Scheffe method and after 5 minutes of LST standing. A statistically significant difference was shown between Thickener A and Thickener F and between Thickener F and G.
Table 3-6 Multiple comparison (upper probability) of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $2\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners by Scheffe's method (after standing still for 5 minutes)
<table><tr><td></td><td>Thickener A</td><td>Thickener B</td><td>Thickener C</td><td>Thickener D</td><td>Thickener E</td><td>Thickener F</td><td>Thickener G</td><td>Thickener H</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener A</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9698</td><td>0.6283</td><td>0.9901</td><td>0.9960</td><td>0.0362</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener B</td><td>0.9698</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9995</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.6504</td><td>0.9366</td><td>0.9995</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener C</td><td>0.6283</td><td>0.9995</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9969</td><td>0.9920</td><td>0.9745</td><td>0.5151</td><td>0.9179</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener D</td><td>0.9901</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9969</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.5151</td><td>0.9745</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener E</td><td>0.9960</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9920</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.4256</td><td>0.9878</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener F</td><td>0.0362</td><td>0.6504</td><td>0.9745</td><td>0.5151</td><td>0.4256</td><td>-----</td><td>0.0208</td><td>0.1732</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener G</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9366</td><td>0.5151</td><td>0.9745</td><td>0.9878</td><td>0.0208</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9997</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener H</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9995</td><td>0.9179</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.1732</td><td>0.9997</td><td>-----</td></tr></table>
Table 3-7 shows the results of multiple comparisons of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $3\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners and after 5 minutes of LST standing according to the Scheffé method. There was no significant difference between all groups.
## IV. DISCUSSION
Among the universal design food (UDF) tongue, crushable foods used this time, shrimp gratin had a nutritional value of 76 kcal of energy, 6 g of protein, 5 g of fat, and 8 g of sugar. The results of the line spread test (LST) performed on this food homogenized with a mixer were $39.3 \pm 2.1$ mm after standing for 30 seconds, and a thin thickness of $43.6 \pm 2.2$ after standing for 5 minutes. It was shown that adding a thickening agent was necessary for safe swallowing. As a result of adding eight types of thickeners to this food, 1g of any thickener per 100g of food resulted in a viscosity of 30mm-33mm, which was determined as an appropriate value. Thickener G had the highest thickening effect, reaching $25.6 \pm 3.4$ mm after standing for 5 minutes. The main component of this thickener G was xanthan gum, and it also contained polysaccharide thickener and sodium chloride. Thickener G had the highest thickening effect, riaching $25.6 \pm 3.4$ mm after standing for 5 minutes. The main component of this Thickener G was xanthan gum, and it also contained polysaccharide thickener and sodium chloride.
Table 3-7 Multiple comparison (upper probability) of LST values after 5 minutes of stirring after adding $3\mathrm{g}$ of 8 types of thickeners by Scheffe's method (after standing still for 5 minutes)
<table><tr><td></td><td>Thickener A</td><td>Thickener B</td><td>Thickener C</td><td>Thickener D</td><td>Thickener E</td><td>Thickener F</td><td>Thickener G</td><td>Thickener H</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener A</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9991</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener B</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9859</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener C</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9946</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener D</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9887</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener E</td><td>0.9991</td><td>0.9859</td><td>0.9946</td><td>0.9887</td><td>-----</td><td>0.9911</td><td>0.9993</td><td>0.9997</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener F</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9911</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener G</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9993</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td><td>1.0000</td></tr><tr><td>Thickener H</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>0.9997</td><td>1.0000</td><td>1.0000</td><td>-----</td></tr></table>
In the case of UDF shrimp gratin, only when Thickener C was added, the LST value after standing for 5 minutes became moderately thick. This result is considered to be influenced by xanthan gum, calcium lactate, and trisodium citrate contained in the Thickener C.
2007, Shiozawa et al. reported that thickeners made food easier to swallow<sup>9)</sup>. In 2005, Kanaoka et al. also reported the effectiveness of thickening agents in preventing gastroesophageal reflux in enteral feeding<sup>10)</sup>.
Studies on the palatability of thickeners have reported that the production of food pastes does not look good and gives poor taste and texture.
Studies on the palatability of thickeners have reported that the production of food pastes not only adversely affects their appearance, but also their palatability and texture $^{11}$.
However, in this study, it was shown that adding a small amount of thickening agent can achieve the desired thickness in the case of foods containing a large amount of carbohydrates. The result is beneficial in terms of taste and cost.
Since around 2010, many research reports on adding thickeners to food have been published. The content was helpful in unifying food properties in various facilities $^{12,13,14}$.
Many studies have also been reported on differences in viscosity due to differences in the main components of thickeners (xanthan gum, guar gum, starch, etc.) $^{12,15}$.
In addition, calcium, phosphoric acid, whey protein, etc., have a synergistic effect and help increase viscosity $^{16}$.
However, it has been reported that the use of thickeners in water may have a negative effect on the efficacy of drugs when administered to patients with swallowing dysfunction, so that caution may be necessary $^{17,18}$. Using a large amount of thickener, the viscosity will increase and it can expect a good effect on swallowing. But it cannot be said that it is very food for palatability and digestion and absorption. Therefore, in the future, we believe that further research on safety, palatability, cost, etc., in swallowing is necessary.
Using too much thickener can affect digestion and palatability. Regarding the prevention of aspiration pneumonia due to gastroesophageal reflux disease and the prevention of digestive absorption inhibition, it is necessary to continue research, including the type and amount of thickener used, compatibility with food, etc.
In the future, we believe it will be possible to provide safer nursing care food by investigating the combination and additional amount of multiple target foods and thickeners. In a super-aging society, it is essential to quickly to cook safe and stable viscosity-adjusted foods at home easily. I would like to continue research and report the results so that ordinary households can eat a safer and more stable meal.
## V. CONCLUSIONS
As the population ages, the number of older people with impaired eating and swallowing functions is increasing. Around the world, the number of patients who develop pneumonia due to aspiration and decreased immunity due to weakened swallowing reflexes due to aging and brain disease is increasing.
Thickeners are being used increasingly to make food safer for people with dysphagia. This Thickener must have low viscosity, no syneresis, no change over time, no loss of palatability, and low reactivity with saliva. Shrimp gratin, a universal design food (UDF) on the market that can be crushed with the tongue, has a nutritional value of 76 kcal of energy, 6 g of protein, 5 g of fat, and 8 g of sugar. This food had a stable viscosity with 1 g thickening agent containing various xanthan gums as the main component. In addition, xanthan gum as the main component and thickeners containing thickening polysaccharides and sodium chloride showed the most stable viscosity.
Using a large amount of thickener, the viscosity will increase and it can expect a good effect on swallowing. But it cannot be said that it is very food for palatability and digestion and absorption. Therefore, in the future, we believe that further research on safety, palatability, cost, etc., in swallowing is necessary.
## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by research aid of the Japanese Society of Taste Technology, 2023
Generating HTML Viewer...
References
5 Cites in Article
Y Iwasaki,T Takahashi,K Nishinari,H Ogoshi (2011). Studya of Incex (Model food) for Thickener Solutions when Users Prepare Them -Evaluation fo Physical Measurements and Non-Oral Sensory Properties-The Japanese.
Sung-Gun Kim,Whachun Yoo,Byoungseung Yoo (2014). Relationship between Apparent Viscosity and Line-Spread Test Measurement of Thickened Fruit Juices Prepared with a Xanthan Gum-based Thickener.
N Yoshinaga,S Baba,T Koga (2017). Evaluation of the Texture of Food for the Dysphagia Diet Served in Hospitals.
Takashi Tomita,Hidekazu Goto,Yuya Yoshimura,Yoshiko Tsubouchi,Rie Nakanishi,Chikako Kojima,Mihoko Yoneshima,Tadashi Yoshida,Katsuya Tanaka,Kenji Sumiya,Yukinao Kohda (2015). Effect of Food Thickener on Disintegration and Dissolution of Magnesium Oxide Tablets.
Y Hashimoto,M Takai,E Nakamura,T Matuura (2016). Adsorption of drugs to soluble dietary fiber used as thickeners.
No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.
Data Availability
Not applicable for this article.
How to Cite This Article
Shoko Kondo. 2026. \u201cViscosity Measurement Results of a Commercially Available Universal Design Food (UDF: can be crushed with the Longue) using the line Spread Test (LST) – Comparison after adding Eight different Types of Thickeners to Shrimp Gratin\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 23 (GJMR Volume 23 Issue K4).
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
Thank you for connecting with us. We will respond to you shortly.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
Viscosity Measurement Results of a Commercially Available Universal Design Food (UDF: can be crushed with the Longue) using the line Spread Test (LST) – Comparison after adding Eight different Types of Thickeners to Shrimp Gratin
