The Private or Public Hospital: Where one should Present with Appendicitis. A Systematic Review

The Private or Public Hospital: Where one should Present with Appendicitis. A Systematic Review

Dr. Matthew Binks

Contact

Dr. Thomas Lyford

Contact

Dr Jessica Henegan

Contact

Dr. Alice Grant Dr. Leigh White

Contact

α University of Newcastle Australia

The Private or Public Hospital: Where one should Present with Appendicitis. A Systematic Review

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

E1YWK

The Private or Public Hospital: Where one should Present with Appendicitis. A Systematic Review Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

20 Cites in Article

Reference Format

H Masoomi (2011). Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.
Lindsay Bliss,Catherine Yang,Tara Kent,Sing Ng,Jonathan Critchlow,Jennifer Tseng (2015). Appendicitis in the modern era: universal problem and variable treatment.
V Kong,B Sartorius,D Clarke (2015). Acute appendicitis in the developing world is a morbid disease.
S Krajewski (2009). Access to emergency operative care: a comparative study between the Canadian and American health care systems.
A Lienhart (2003). Simulation et anesthesie reanimation.
T Ponsky (2004). Hospital-and patient-level characteristics and the risk of appendiceal rupture and negative appendectomy in children.
Yao Tian,John Sweeney,Mark Wulkan,Kurt Heiss,Mehul Raval (2016). The necessity of sociodemographic status adjustment in hospital value rankings for perforated appendicitis in children.
D Kearney,R Cahill,E O'brien,W Kirwan,H Redmond (2008). Influence of Delays on Perforation Risk in Adults with Acute Appendicitis.
B Papaziogas,P Tsiaousis,I Koutelidakis,A Giakoustidis,S Atmatzidis,K Atmatzidis (2009). Effect of Time on Risk of Perforation in Acute Appendicitis.
Nathan Hoot,Dominik Aronsky (2008). Systematic Review of Emergency Department Crowding: Causes, Effects, and Solutions.
Júlio Coelho,Fabiana Fernandes,Luís Cortiano,Gustavo Leme,José Sadowski,Christian Artner (2010). Appendectomy: comparative study between a public and a private hospital.
D Mackrill,S Allison (2015). Laparoscopic appendicectomy: an operation for all trainees but does the learning curves continue into consultanthood?.
Milton Steinman,Patrícia Rogeri,Lia Lenci,Clara Kirschner,José Teixeira,Paulo Gonçalves,Nelson Akamine,Silvio Possa (2013). Appendicitis: What does really make the difference between private and public hospitals?.
Estin Yang,Colin Cook,Delawir Kahn (2015). Acute Appendicitis in the Public and Private Sectors in Cape Town, South Africa.
Nathan Zilbert,Emily Stamell,Isaac Ezon,Avi Schlager,Howard Ginsburg,Evan Nadler (2009). Management and Outcomes for Children with Acute Appendicitis Differ by Hospital Type: Areas for Improvement at Public Hospitals.
Gerry Fitzgerald,Ghasem Toloo,Jun He,Gavin Doig,David Rosengren,Sean Rothwell,Ron Sultana,Steve Costello,Xiang‐yu Hou (2013). Private hospital emergency departments in <scp>A</scp>ustralia: Challenges and opportunities.
N Bickell (2006). How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis.
J Bennett,A Boddy,M Rhodes (2007). Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Xiaohang Li,Jialin Zhang,Lixuan Sang,Wenliang Zhang,Zhiqiang Chu,Xin Li,Yongfeng Liu (2010). Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Daniel Shabanzadeh,Lars Sørensen (2012). Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Open Surgery Decreases Surgical Site Infection in Obese Patients.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Matthew Binks. 2018. \u201cThe Private or Public Hospital: Where one should Present with Appendicitis. A Systematic Review\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 18 (GJMR Volume 18 Issue K1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMR Volume 18 Issue K1
Pg. 23- 27

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-K Classification: NLMC Code: WI 535

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 20, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 149

Country: Australia

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - K: Interdisciplinary

Authors: Dr. Matthew Binks, Dr. Thomas Lyford, Dr Jessica Henegan, Dr. Alice Grant Dr. Leigh White (PhD/Dr. count: 3)

View Count (all-time): 142

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3233

Total Downloads (simulated): 1509

Publish Date: 2018 03, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 48 views
Month 2: 45 views
Month 3: 52 views
Month 4: 56 views
Month 5: 47 views
Month 6: 51 views
Month 7: 31 views
Month 8: 46 views
Month 9: 29 views
Month 10: 30 views
Month 11: 31 views
Month 12: 30 views
Month 13: 21 views
Month 14: 24 views
Month 15: 29 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 28 views
Month 18: 23 views
Month 19: 36 views
Month 20: 37 views
Month 21: 17 views
Month 22: 48 views
Month 23: 13 views
Month 24: 25 views
Month 25: 19 views
Month 26: 40 views
Month 27: 46 views
Month 28: 40 views
Month 29: 24 views
Month 30: 44 views
Month 31: 16 views
Month 32: 23 views
Month 33: 25 views
Month 34: 39 views
Month 35: 26 views
Month 36: 50 views
Month 37: 30 views
Month 38: 14 views
Month 39: 32 views
Month 40: 43 views
Month 41: 39 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 39 views
Month 44: 28 views
Month 45: 20 views
Month 46: 34 views
Month 47: 39 views
Month 48: 21 views
Month 49: 24 views
Month 50: 33 views
Month 51: 31 views
Month 52: 31 views
Month 53: 22 views
Month 54: 44 views
Month 55: 36 views
Month 56: 49 views
Month 57: 34 views
Month 58: 25 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 31 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 35 views
Month 64: 26 views
Month 65: 22 views
Month 66: 19 views
Month 67: 37 views
Month 68: 21 views
Month 69: 21 views
Month 70: 33 views
Month 71: 45 views
Month 72: 48 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 25 views
Month 76: 26 views
Month 77: 20 views
Month 78: 34 views
Month 79: 23 views
Month 80: 28 views
Month 81: 32 views
Month 82: 35 views
Month 83: 35 views
Month 84: 35 views
Month 85: 22 views
Month 86: 38 views
Month 87: 42 views
Month 88: 38 views
Month 89: 34 views
Month 90: 55 views
Month 91: 43 views
Month 92: 26 views
Month 93: 23 views
Month 94: 11 views
Month 95: 37 views
Month 96: 24 views
Month 97: 52 views

Total Views: 3233

Total Downloads: 1509

2026 Trends

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]