Quality Evaluation and Preparation of Apple and Olive Fruit Blended Jam

Quality Evaluation and Preparation of Apple and Olive Fruit Blended Jam

Article ID

99Y6X

, , , , , , , , ,

Quality Evaluation and Preparation of Apple and Olive Fruit Blended Jam

Wasif Shah

Arsalan Khan Agriculture Research Institute ARI Tarnab Peshawar Pakistan

Alam Zeb

Muhammad Ali Khan

Falak Naz Shah

Noor UL Amin

Muhammad Ayub

Said Wahab

Ali Muhammad

Sher Hassan Khan

DOI

Access OJS

Abstract

The present research work was carried out to investigate the effect of storage and treatment on overall quality of the apple olive blended jam, and to develop a suitable combination of olive and apple fruits pulps for jam preparation. Jam prepared from various blends of apple and olive were studied for physico chemical properties such as,% acidity, pH, (TSS), % non-reducing and % reducing sugar and for sensory attributes namely, taste, texture, color and overall acceptability during three months of storage with an interval of fifteen days. Results indicated that titratable acidity was increased from 0.64 to 0.77%, with reduction in pH from 3.57 to 3.40. Non reducing sugar was decreased from 44.57 to 27.52%. On the other hand reducing sugar of all jam samples increased from 16.62 to 30.52%. TSS of jam samples was increased during storage from 69.37 to 70.43 0Brix.

Quality Evaluation and Preparation of Apple and Olive Fruit Blended Jam

Authors

Wasif Shah

Arsalan Khan Agriculture Research Institute ARI Tarnab Peshawar Pakistan

Alam Zeb

Muhammad Ali Khan

Falak Naz Shah

Noor UL Amin

Muhammad Ayub

Said Wahab

Ali Muhammad

Sher Hassan Khan

Figure

No Figures found in article.

References

How to Cite

Arsalan Khan. 2015. “. Global Journal of Medical Research – L: Nutrition GJMR-L Volume 15 (GJMR Volume 15 Issue L1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

GJMR Volume 15 Issue L1
Pg. 15- 21

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Classification

GJMR-L Classification: NLMC Code: QU 145.5

Submission Received December 9, 2014
Accepted January 1, 2015
Published January 15, 2015

Keywords

Not Found

Article Matrices

Total Score: 110

Country: Pakistan

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - L: Nutrition

Authors: Wasif Shah, Arsalan Khan, Alam Zeb, Muhammad Ali Khan, Falak Naz Shah, Noor UL Amin, Muhammad Ayub, Said Wahab, Ali Muhammad, Sher Hassan Khan (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 146

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3987

Total Downloads (simulated): 2068

Publish Date: 2015 08, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 26 views
Month 2: 26 views
Month 3: 63 views
Month 4: 25 views
Month 5: 39 views
Month 6: 39 views
Month 7: 51 views
Month 8: 48 views
Month 9: 39 views
Month 10: 26 views
Month 11: 56 views
Month 12: 22 views
Month 13: 36 views
Month 14: 39 views
Month 15: 38 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 25 views
Month 18: 33 views
Month 19: 39 views
Month 20: 47 views
Month 21: 37 views
Month 22: 35 views
Month 23: 24 views
Month 24: 20 views
Month 25: 18 views
Month 26: 30 views
Month 27: 48 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 28 views
Month 30: 26 views
Month 31: 31 views
Month 32: 22 views
Month 33: 32 views
Month 34: 43 views
Month 35: 31 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 35 views
Month 38: 33 views
Month 39: 31 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 41 views
Month 42: 36 views
Month 43: 42 views
Month 44: 32 views
Month 45: 37 views
Month 46: 19 views
Month 47: 22 views
Month 48: 17 views
Month 49: 27 views
Month 50: 15 views
Month 51: 44 views
Month 52: 23 views
Month 53: 29 views
Month 54: 42 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 41 views
Month 57: 15 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 23 views
Month 60: 17 views
Month 61: 21 views
Month 62: 30 views
Month 63: 36 views
Month 64: 36 views
Month 65: 16 views
Month 66: 32 views
Month 67: 26 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 21 views
Month 70: 35 views
Month 71: 33 views
Month 72: 32 views
Month 73: 33 views
Month 74: 34 views
Month 75: 35 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 22 views
Month 78: 26 views
Month 79: 23 views
Month 80: 20 views
Month 81: 24 views
Month 82: 19 views
Month 83: 21 views
Month 84: 36 views
Month 85: 15 views
Month 86: 27 views
Month 87: 32 views
Month 88: 29 views
Month 89: 20 views
Month 90: 37 views
Month 91: 28 views
Month 92: 38 views
Month 93: 13 views
Month 94: 22 views
Month 95: 27 views
Month 96: 34 views
Month 97: 28 views
Month 98: 19 views
Month 99: 26 views
Month 100: 33 views
Month 101: 35 views
Month 102: 16 views
Month 103: 26 views
Month 104: 28 views
Month 105: 14 views
Month 106: 34 views
Month 107: 19 views
Month 108: 38 views
Month 109: 31 views
Month 110: 36 views
Month 111: 41 views
Month 112: 26 views
Month 113: 26 views
Month 114: 27 views
Month 115: 42 views
Month 116: 18 views
Month 117: 40 views
Month 118: 40 views
Month 119: 36 views
Month 120: 29 views
Month 121: 36 views
Month 122: 28 views
Month 123: 19 views
Month 124: 23 views
Month 125: 20 views
Month 126: 26 views
Month 127: 36 views
Month 128: 31 views

Total Views: 3987

Total Downloads: 2068

2026 Trends

Research Identity (RIN)

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]