Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
O3Y03
This study aimed to was evaluating the performance of 30 methods to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ET0) to the city of Paranaíba, Brazil. The meteorological data was removed from National Institute of Meteorology, on the period of six year (March 2008 to February 2014). The method taken as standard was Penman-Monteith-FAO56 and the comparison of results was by the coefficients of determination (r²), coefficients “a” and “b” of the linear regressions, estimate of standard-error, Willmott’s index of agreement (d), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and reliable coefficient (c). The better methods to ET0 estimate was: Penman-Original, Stephens-Stewart, Priestley-Taylor, Hicks-Hess, Turc, Liquid-Radiation, Thornthwaite-Modified, Temperature-Radiation, Penman-FAO24, Abtew and Camargo. The Camargo method should be preferred when only air temperatures data have. The methods Blaney-Criddle-FAO24 and Hamon should receive calibration for be utilized on the estimate of ET0 in Paranaíba city.
Fernando Franca Da Cunha. 2015. \u201cComparative Study of Methods for Estimating Evapotranspiration Reference in ParanaAba City, Brazil\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management GJHSS-B Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue B1).
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS
Print ISSN 0975-587X
e-ISSN 2249-460X
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
Total Score: 104
Country: Brazil
Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management
Authors: Fernando Franca Da Cunha, Thiago Ramos Da Silva, Arthur Ribeiro Ximenes, Rafael Oliveira Batista (PhD/Dr. count: 0)
View Count (all-time): 195
Total Views (Real + Logic): 4644
Total Downloads (simulated): 2326
Publish Date: 2015 03, Tue
Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.