Emerging Trends in Employment Relations: The Case of Essential Service Employees in the Botswana Public Sector

Article ID

74M2S

Emerging Trends in Employment Relations: The Case of Essential Service Employees in the Botswana Public Sector

Emmanuel Kodzo
Emmanuel Kodzo
Bediaku Ntumy
Bediaku Ntumy
DOI

Abstract

This paper is intended as an advocacy for a more pragmatic approach to employment relations particularly within the public sector. To do this, the paper uses the recent problems surrounding the issue of essential services in Botswana as a context. The paper acknowledges that such an exercise calls for an objective appreciation of the state as an employer, a prime mover in employment relations and the institution in control of both legislative authority and political power. The paper also recognises the apparently unfettered discretionary authority reposed in the upper echelons of the public bureaucracy not only to implement policies and laws but also to make rules and purport to apply such rules in a quasi-judicial manner. Furthermore, the paper also asserts that the impact of the actions of all these adjuncts of the state machinery on worker formations and their members including those employed in ”essential services” has not been mutually beneficial. The paper notes that, where the state appears to be weakening, the agencies created, including the coercive institutionalised structures, take over the functions of both the Executive and the Legislature.1 An undesirable consequence of the state being held captive by these agencies in the field would be the deleterious impact on several spheres of social interaction. These issues are discussed within the framework of labour law. To do this, the paper attempts to define the relationship between public service workers and the state as the employer. These issues are tested within the context of how “essential services” are determined. The paper concludes that the modalities by which workplace phenomena, such as “essential services” are prescribed will determine the sustainability of deliberative social partnering. In default, legislation and coercive authority will both be inefficient and ineffective simply because the legitimizing constituency will always be the final arbiter.

Emerging Trends in Employment Relations: The Case of Essential Service Employees in the Botswana Public Sector

This paper is intended as an advocacy for a more pragmatic approach to employment relations particularly within the public sector. To do this, the paper uses the recent problems surrounding the issue of essential services in Botswana as a context. The paper acknowledges that such an exercise calls for an objective appreciation of the state as an employer, a prime mover in employment relations and the institution in control of both legislative authority and political power. The paper also recognises the apparently unfettered discretionary authority reposed in the upper echelons of the public bureaucracy not only to implement policies and laws but also to make rules and purport to apply such rules in a quasi-judicial manner. Furthermore, the paper also asserts that the impact of the actions of all these adjuncts of the state machinery on worker formations and their members including those employed in ”essential services” has not been mutually beneficial. The paper notes that, where the state appears to be weakening, the agencies created, including the coercive institutionalised structures, take over the functions of both the Executive and the Legislature.1 An undesirable consequence of the state being held captive by these agencies in the field would be the deleterious impact on several spheres of social interaction. These issues are discussed within the framework of labour law. To do this, the paper attempts to define the relationship between public service workers and the state as the employer. These issues are tested within the context of how “essential services” are determined. The paper concludes that the modalities by which workplace phenomena, such as “essential services” are prescribed will determine the sustainability of deliberative social partnering. In default, legislation and coercive authority will both be inefficient and ineffective simply because the legitimizing constituency will always be the final arbiter.

Emmanuel Kodzo
Emmanuel Kodzo
Bediaku Ntumy
Bediaku Ntumy

No Figures found in article.

Emmanuel Kodzo-Bediaku Ntumy. 2015. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – F: Political Science GJHSS-F Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue F7): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Classification
GJHSS-F Classification: FOR Code: 940501p
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 3853
Total Downloads: 2036
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Emerging Trends in Employment Relations: The Case of Essential Service Employees in the Botswana Public Sector

Emmanuel Kodzo
Emmanuel Kodzo
Bediaku Ntumy
Bediaku Ntumy

Research Journals