Reconceptualizing Development: A Linkages-of-Capital Approach

Article ID

CJJ41

Reconceptualizing Development: A Linkages-of-Capital Approach

Russell John Foote
Russell John Foote School of Higher Education
DOI

Abstract

Current theorizing and measurement do not really capture the multidimensional nature of development. The received wisdom fuelling development efforts has highlighted the importance of technological accumulation (Bell and Pavitt 1997), economic modeling (Zafirovski 1999), people’s participation (Redclift 1992), bilateralism and multilateralism via trading blocs (Riley 1998), structural adjustment and the importance of contemporary knowledge management. (Jayarajah and Branson 1995). The major deficiency of these approaches is that they have largely focused on one aspect of development and the resultant practices have spawned a variety of destabilizing and decivilizing processes which continue to escalate: rich-poor gaps, gender, social class, religious geographic inequalities and social problems. These have been further aggravated by materialist values which usually accompany capitalist-driven development. Collectively, over time, the aforementioned impacts and approaches have sometimes increased or decreased the strengths and vulnerabilities of economies globally to varying degrees. One international response to shortcomings in measurement was to strengthen the (GNP) or Gross National Product with the HDI or Human Development Index. The former was a purely economic measure while the latter, (HDI), took into consideration other factors such as literacy levels, life expectancy and educational attainment. (Beneria 2003). After decades of development theorizing, research, policy formulation and program implementation, the ‘balance sheet’ still shows little progress in some areas and increasing inequalities and deprivations in others. This obviously requires that we revisit current notions of development particularly now when many development perspectives are only addressing parts of the issue. (Kothari and Minogue 2002). Moreover, we need a philosophy for development, one that prioritizes the need for people and nature to be harmonized, theory development be interdis

Reconceptualizing Development: A Linkages-of-Capital Approach

Current theorizing and measurement do not really capture the multidimensional nature of development. The received wisdom fuelling development efforts has highlighted the importance of technological accumulation (Bell and Pavitt 1997), economic modeling (Zafirovski 1999), people’s participation (Redclift 1992), bilateralism and multilateralism via trading blocs (Riley 1998), structural adjustment and the importance of contemporary knowledge management. (Jayarajah and Branson 1995). The major deficiency of these approaches is that they have largely focused on one aspect of development and the resultant practices have spawned a variety of destabilizing and decivilizing processes which continue to escalate: rich-poor gaps, gender, social class, religious geographic inequalities and social problems. These have been further aggravated by materialist values which usually accompany capitalist-driven development. Collectively, over time, the aforementioned impacts and approaches have sometimes increased or decreased the strengths and vulnerabilities of economies globally to varying degrees. One international response to shortcomings in measurement was to strengthen the (GNP) or Gross National Product with the HDI or Human Development Index. The former was a purely economic measure while the latter, (HDI), took into consideration other factors such as literacy levels, life expectancy and educational attainment. (Beneria 2003). After decades of development theorizing, research, policy formulation and program implementation, the ‘balance sheet’ still shows little progress in some areas and increasing inequalities and deprivations in others. This obviously requires that we revisit current notions of development particularly now when many development perspectives are only addressing parts of the issue. (Kothari and Minogue 2002). Moreover, we need a philosophy for development, one that prioritizes the need for people and nature to be harmonized, theory development be interdis

Russell John Foote
Russell John Foote School of Higher Education

No Figures found in article.

Russell John Foote. 2016. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – E: Economics GJHSS-E Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue E9): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 15 Issue E9
Pg. 21- 34
Classification
GJHSS-E Classification: FOR Code: 340299p
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 3979
Total Downloads: 2103
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Reconceptualizing Development: A Linkages-of-Capital Approach

Russell John Foote
Russell John Foote School of Higher Education

Research Journals